JUDr. Hana Posluchová

  1. Active judge at the court Mestský súd Bratislava II, we register 2,270 hearings and 1,680 judgements.

Close persons acknowledged in property declarations in years 2014, 2013, 2012, and 2011.

Close persons acknowledged in property declaration in a year 2014:

Close persons acknowledged in property declaration in a year 2013:

Close persons acknowledged in property declaration in a year 2012:

Close persons acknowledged in property declaration in a year 2011:

obtained from annual statistical reports of judges.

Indicators for 2021

Overall evaluation of the judge is above average.
Incoming cases for the judge in 2021 were mostly from family agenda. Judge's decrees in 2021 were mostly from family agenda.

Component – Quality

We register 78.95% decrees for the judge, which are confirmed by the higher court in case of an appeal. The median amongst judges is 68,9%. We register 95 decrees concerning appeals.
In this dimension the judge belongs to the group that is better than average.

Component – Effectivity

The judge had overal appointment of cases of 98.16% in 2021. The median amongst judges is 107,9%.
Anticipated time of the judge was based on data from 2021 276 days. Median amongst judges was 224,3 days.
In 2021 the judge decided 267 cases in the observed agendas.
In this dimension the judge belongs to the group that is average.

Component – Productivity

Weighted product of the judge in 2021 was 238.596. Median amongst judges was 248,1.
For the judge we register 198 unresolved cases at the end of 2021. From those 37.88% are restant cases. Median amongst judges was 39,34% of restant cases from the total number of unresolved cases.
In this dimension the judge belongs to the group that is average.

Overall Evaluation
Evaluation on a scale from 0 to 10.

Indicators for 2017

Number of Constitutional Court decisions against the judge:

  • Issued – 0
  • Delays prior to case assignment – 0

The judge was mostly assigned to Civil agenda. The judge mostly issued judgements in Civil agenda.

The judge worked 673 days in the period and was assigned on average 15 cases per 100 days in main agendas.

Evaluation

In 2017, the judge received in total 24 from 40 possible points and ranked on 201 – 223. place of 651 evaluated judges.

  • Quality – 9 out of 15 points
  • Effectivity – 15 out of 25 points

Chart Comparison

Legend
Advanced Comparison
The chart is most useful for comparisons of judges at the same or similar courts, and those who decide cases in the same or similar agenda. Specific courts and agendas have an impact on the overall performance of judges. Simply put, commercial judge from Bratislava and criminal judge from Rožňava decide uncomparable cases.

Quality Indicators

The judge's judgements were on appeal affirmed in 73.5% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 68.7%.

  • Number of Appellate Decisions – 34
  • Number of Affirmed Decisions – 25

An appeal against the judge's judgements is filed in 4.1% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 10.1%.

Of the total number of the judge's judgements 1.1% is changed or reversed. The average in the same agenda is 3.1%.

Effectivity Indicators

Estimated average length of proceedings is 306.1 days. The average at the end of 2017 was 340.8 days.

The judge had 130 unresolved cases at the end of 2017. The average was 192.7 cases.

The judge had 83 restant cases at the end of 2017. The average was 111.7. This represents 63.8% of the judge's unresolved cases. Average was 54.1%.

In 2017, the judge was able to resolve 176.1% of assigned cases. Average was 141.8%.

Indicators for 2015

We do not register any indicators for the judge yet.

Indicators for 2013

The number of Constitutional court judgements against the judges – issued 0 and delays prior to case assignment 0.

For the judge we register performance data for years 2011 – 2012:

Sudcovi bola prideľovaná najmä Občiansko–právna agenda. Sudca rozhodoval najmä v Občiansko–právnej agende.

The judge in this period worked 175 days and on average was assigned 206 cases in 10 days in main agendas.

Chart Comparison

Legend
Advanced Comparison
The chart is most useful for comparisons of judges at the same or similar courts, and those who decide cases in the same or similar agenda. Specific courts and agendas have an impact on the overall performance of judges. Simply put, commercial judge from Bratislava and criminal judge from Rožňava decide uncomparable cases.

Quality indicators

Rozhodnutie sudcu bolo v prípade odvolania potvrdené v 69,2% prípadoch, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 62,9%.

  • Number of appellate judgements – 13
  • Number of confirmed judgements – 9

Odvolanie proti rozhodnutiam sudcu je podávané v približne 6,6% prípadoch, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 8,9%.

Z celkového počtu rozhodnutí sudcu je zmenených alebo zrušených 2%, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 3,3%.

Efficiency indicators

Pre sudcu evidujeme menej ako 20 rozhodnutí, preto jeho efektivitu nehodnotíme.

Notes

obtained from annual statistical reports of judges pertaining to indicators.

  • 2012 – Sudca sa nezúčastnil na žiadnej vzdelávacej aktivite.
  • 2012 – Sudca nemal znížený nápad.
  • 2011 – sudca sa zúčastnil 1x vzdelávacej aktivity, ktorú organizovalo MS SR; 2012 – Sudca sa nezúčastnil na žiadnej vzdelávacej aktivite.
  • 2011 – sudca sa zúčastnil 1x vzdelávacej aktivity, ktorú organizovalo MS SR
  • 2011 – sudca dňom 12.09.2011 nastúpil na výkon funkcie po ukončení rodičovskej dovolenky a odo dňa nástupu má v oddelení zvýšený nápad vecí; 2012 – Sudca nemal znížený nápad.
  • 2011 – sudca dňom 12.09.2011 nastúpil na výkon funkcie po ukončení rodičovskej dovolenky a odo dňa nástupu má v oddelení zvýšený nápad vecí

Published judgements

  1. Rozsudok – Rozvod
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  2. Rozsudok – Vyživovacie povinnosti
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  3. Uznesenie – Vyživovacie povinnosti
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  4. Rozsudok – Rozvod
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  5. Rozsudok – Starostlivosť o maloletých
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  6. Rozsudok – Rozvod
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  7. Rozsudok – Starostlivosť o maloletých
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  8. Rozsudok – Výchovné opatrenia
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  9. Rozsudok – Starostlivosť o maloletých
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  10. Uznesenie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

More judgements

Upcoming hearings

We do not register any upcoming hearings for the judge yet.

Past hearings

  1. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, zverenie do pestúnskej… Hearing was held on

  2. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, rozvod Hearing was held on

  3. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, Rozvod manželstva + ÚPP Hearing was held on

  4. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, rozhodnutie pri nezhode… Hearing was held on

  5. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, rozvod Hearing was held on

  6. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, prinavrátenie… Hearing was held on

  7. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, úpp na čas do rozvodu Hearing was held on

  8. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, rozvod + ÚPP Hearing was held on

  9. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, schválenie právného úkonu Hearing was held on

  10. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, zvýšenie výživného na… Hearing was held on

More hearings

Information regarding the court were obtained from the judge list, which was most recently updated on . The information may have been additionally supplemented by the data retrieved from property declarations and statistical reports.