JUDr. Darina Puklušová

  1. Active judge at the court Okresný súd Spišská Nová Ves, we register 2,665 hearings and 7,528 judgements.
  1. The judge has been nominated to function for almost 25 years, bez časového obmedzenia funkcie.

obtained from annual statistical reports of judges.

Indicators for 2017

Number of Constitutional Court decisions against the judge:

  • Issued – 0
  • Delays prior to case assignment – 0

The judge was mostly assigned to Civil agenda. The judge mostly issued judgements in Civil agenda.

The judge worked 1486 days in the period and was assigned on average 24 cases per 100 days in main agendas.

Evaluation

In 2017, the judge received in total 14.5 from 40 possible points and ranked on 575 – 580. place of 651 evaluated judges.

  • Quality – 4.5 out of 15 points
  • Effectivity – 10 out of 25 points

Chart Comparison

Legend
Advanced Comparison
The chart is most useful for comparisons of judges at the same or similar courts, and those who decide cases in the same or similar agenda. Specific courts and agendas have an impact on the overall performance of judges. Simply put, commercial judge from Bratislava and criminal judge from Rožňava decide uncomparable cases.

Quality Indicators

The judge's judgements were on appeal affirmed in 59.7% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 68.7%.

  • Number of Appellate Decisions – 248
  • Number of Affirmed Decisions – 148

An appeal against the judge's judgements is filed in 10% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 10.1%.

Of the total number of the judge's judgements 4% is changed or reversed. The average in the same agenda is 3.1%.

Effectivity Indicators

Estimated average length of proceedings is 353.8 days. The average at the end of 2017 was 340.8 days.

The judge had 126 unresolved cases at the end of 2017. The average was 192.7 cases.

The judge had 76 restant cases at the end of 2017. The average was 111.7. This represents 60.3% of the judge's unresolved cases. Average was 54.1%.

In 2017, the judge was able to resolve 109.2% of assigned cases. Average was 141.8%.

Indicators for 2015

Number of Constitutional Court decisions against the judge:

  • Issued – 0
  • Delays prior to case assignment – 0

The judge was mostly assigned to Civil agenda. The judge mostly issued judgements in Civil agenda.

The judge worked 1078 days in the period and was assigned on average 26 cases per 100 days in main agendas.

Evaluation

In 2015, the judge received in total 13 from 40 possible points and ranked on 668 – 676. place of 738 evaluated judges.

  • Quality – 0 out of 15 points
  • Effectivity – 13 out of 25 points

Quality Indicators

The judge's judgements were on appeal affirmed in 42.4% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 67.1%.

  • Number of Appellate Decisions – 139
  • Number of Affirmed Decisions – 59

An appeal against the judge's judgements is filed in 6.9% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 9.3%.

Of the total number of the judge's judgements 4% is changed or reversed. The average in the same agenda is 3%.

Effectivity Indicators

Estimated average length of proceedings is 279 days. The average at the end of 2015 was 339 days.

The judge had 429 unresolved cases at the end of 2015. The average was 377 cases.

The judge had 210 restant cases at the end of 2015. The average was 150. This represents 49% of the judge's unresolved cases. Average was 42.6%.

In 2015, the judge was able to resolve 96.4% of assigned cases. Average was 97.1%.

Indicators for 2013

The number of Constitutional court judgements against the judges – issued 0 and delays prior to case assignment 0.

For the judge we register performance data for years 2011 – 2013:

Sudcovi bola prideľovaná najmä Občiansko–právna agenda. Sudca rozhodoval najmä v Občiansko–právnej agende.

The judge in this period worked 662 days and on average was assigned 171 cases in 10 days in main agendas.

Quality indicators

Rozhodnutie sudcu bolo v prípade odvolania potvrdené v 68,1% prípadoch, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 62,9%.

  • Number of appellate judgements – 47
  • Number of confirmed judgements – 32

Odvolanie proti rozhodnutiam sudcu je podávané v približne 5,1% prípadoch, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 8,9%.

Z celkového počtu rozhodnutí sudcu je zmenených alebo zrušených 1,6%, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 3,3%.

Efficiency indicators

Odhadovaná priemerná dĺžka konania sporu je 325 dní. Priemer bol na konci roka 346 dní.

Sudca mal na konci roka 2013 nevybavených 369 prípadov. Priemer bol 238.

Sudca mal na konci roka 251 reštančných vecí, pričom priemer je 126. To u sudcu tvorí 63,4% z nevybavených vecí. Priemer je 43,4.

Sudca dokázal v roku 2013 vybaviť, k počtu pridelených vecí, 111,3% prípadov. Priemer bol 99,6%.

Sudca získal podľa našej metodológie celkovo 18 bodov. Spomedzi 739 hodnotených sudcov sa umiestnil na 519 – 534. mieste. Za kvalitu získal 9,75 z 15 možných bodov, za efektivitu 8,25 z 25.

Notes

obtained from annual statistical reports of judges pertaining to indicators.

  • 2013 – Sudkyňa sa zúčastňovala na všetkých vzdelávacích aktivitách
  • 2012 – Sudca sa zúčastňoval na všetkých vzdelávacích aktivitách; 2013 – Sudkyňa sa zúčastňovala na všetkých vzdelávacích aktivitách
  • 2012 – Sudca sa zúčastňoval na všetkých vzdelávacích aktivitách
  • 2012 – Nápad za rok 2012 bol zvýšený
  • 2012 – Nápad za rok 2012 bol zvýšený

Published judgements

  1. Platobný rozkaz – Ostatné
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  2. Platobný rozkaz – Poistenie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  3. Rozsudok bez odôvodnenia – Vlastnícke právo…
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  4. Rozsudok bez odôvodnenia – Vyživovacie povinnosti
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  5. Platobný rozkaz – Spotrebiteľské zmluvy
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  6. Platobný rozkaz – Spotrebiteľské zmluvy
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  7. Platobný rozkaz – Spotrebiteľské zmluvy
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  8. Platobný rozkaz – Nájomná zmluva
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  9. Platobný rozkaz – Spotrebiteľské zmluvy
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  10. Platobný rozkaz – Spotrebiteľské zmluvy
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

More judgements

Upcoming hearings

  1. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, vypratanie nehnuteľností s… Hearing will be held on

  2. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, 520,68 € s prísl. Hearing will be held on

  3. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, vysporiadanie BSM Hearing will be held on

  4. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, určenie neplatnosti… Hearing will be held on

  5. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, nariadnie NO a určenie… Hearing will be held on

  6. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, vyporiadanie BSM s prísl. Hearing will be held on

  7. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, Zvýšenie výživného Hearing will be held on

  8. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, zapretie otcovstva Hearing will be held on

  9. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, zvýšenie výživného Hearing will be held on

  10. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, určenie vlastníckeho práva s… Hearing will be held on

More hearings

Past hearings

  1. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, 223,01 € s príslušenstvom Hearing was held on

  2. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, nariadenie NO, neplatnosť… Hearing was held on

  3. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, určenie výživného Hearing was held on

  4. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, zaplatenie 1.060,- Eur s… Hearing was held on

  5. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, žaloba o zdržanie sa zásahov do… Hearing was held on

  6. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, o zaplatenie 107,78 EUR s… Hearing was held on

  7. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, o zaplatenie 582,06 Eur s… Hearing was held on

  8. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, o zaplatenie 81,43 Eur s… Hearing was held on

  9. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, žaloba o určenie vlastníckeho… Hearing was held on

  10. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, zaplatenie 1.060,- Eur s… Hearing was held on

More hearings

Information regarding the court were obtained from the judge list, which was most recently updated on . The information may have been additionally supplemented by the data retrieved from property declarations and statistical reports.