JUDr. Miroslav Studenčan

  1. Active judge at the court Okresný súd Galanta, we register 3,821 hearings and 2,533 judgements.

obtained from annual statistical reports of judges.

Indicators for 2017

Number of Constitutional Court decisions against the judge:

  • Issued – 0
  • Delays prior to case assignment – 0

The judge was mostly assigned to Criminal agenda. The judge mostly issued judgements in translation missing: en.judges.indicators_2015.basic.decided_agenda.trestná.

The judge worked 1475 days in the period and was assigned on average 156 cases per 100 days in main agendas.

Evaluation

In 2017, the judge received in total 24 from 40 possible points and ranked on 201 – 223. place of 651 evaluated judges.

  • Quality – 9 out of 15 points
  • Effectivity – 15 out of 25 points

Chart Comparison

Legend
Advanced Comparison
The chart is most useful for comparisons of judges at the same or similar courts, and those who decide cases in the same or similar agenda. Specific courts and agendas have an impact on the overall performance of judges. Simply put, commercial judge from Bratislava and criminal judge from Rožňava decide uncomparable cases.

Quality Indicators

The judge's judgements were on appeal affirmed in 71.9% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 66%.

  • Number of Appellate Decisions – 185
  • Number of Affirmed Decisions – 133

An appeal against the judge's judgements is filed in 5.3% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 8.7%.

Of the total number of the judge's judgements 1.5% is changed or reversed. The average in the same agenda is 2.9%.

Effectivity Indicators

Estimated average length of proceedings is 130.1 days. The average at the end of 2017 was 340.8 days.

The judge had 174 unresolved cases at the end of 2017. The average was 192.7 cases.

The judge had 79 restant cases at the end of 2017. The average was 111.7. This represents 45.4% of the judge's unresolved cases. Average was 54.1%.

In 2017, the judge was able to resolve 110.2% of assigned cases. Average was 141.8%.

Indicators for 2015

Number of Constitutional Court decisions against the judge:

  • Issued – 0
  • Delays prior to case assignment – 0

The judge was mostly assigned to Criminal agenda. The judge mostly issued judgements in Criminal agenda.

The judge worked 1051 days in the period and was assigned on average 110 cases per 100 days in main agendas.

Evaluation

In 2015, the judge received in total 27 from 40 possible points and ranked on 134 – 152. place of 738 evaluated judges.

  • Quality – 9 out of 15 points
  • Effectivity – 18 out of 25 points

Quality Indicators

The judge's judgements were on appeal affirmed in 69.4% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 63.8%.

  • Number of Appellate Decisions – 121
  • Number of Affirmed Decisions – 84

An appeal against the judge's judgements is filed in 4.9% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 8.1%.

Of the total number of the judge's judgements 1.5% is changed or reversed. The average in the same agenda is 3%.

Effectivity Indicators

Estimated average length of proceedings is 105 days. The average at the end of 2015 was 339 days.

The judge had 145 unresolved cases at the end of 2015. The average was 377 cases.

The judge had 56 restant cases at the end of 2015. The average was 150. This represents 38.6% of the judge's unresolved cases. Average was 42.6%.

In 2015, the judge was able to resolve 103.7% of assigned cases. Average was 97.1%.

Indicators for 2013

The number of Constitutional court judgements against the judges – issued 0 and delays prior to case assignment 0.

For the judge we register performance data for years 2011 – 2013:

Sudcovi bola prideľovaná najmä Trestná agenda. Sudca rozhodoval najmä v Trestnej agende.

The judge in this period worked 632 days and on average was assigned 155 cases in 10 days in main agendas.

Quality indicators

Rozhodnutie sudcu bolo v prípade odvolania potvrdené v 53,4% prípadoch, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 52,3%.

  • Number of appellate judgements – 58
  • Number of confirmed judgements – 31

Odvolanie proti rozhodnutiam sudcu je podávané v približne 5,2% prípadoch, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 8,4%.

Z celkového počtu rozhodnutí sudcu je zmenených alebo zrušených 2,4%, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 4%.

Efficiency indicators

Odhadovaná priemerná dĺžka konania sporu je 97 dní. Priemer bol na konci roka 346 dní.

Sudca mal na konci roka 2013 nevybavených 85 prípadov. Priemer bol 238.

Sudca mal na konci roka 46 reštančných vecí, pričom priemer je 126. To u sudcu tvorí 46,5% z nevybavených vecí. Priemer je 43,4.

Sudca dokázal v roku 2013 vybaviť, k počtu pridelených vecí, 120,4% prípadov. Priemer bol 99,6%.

Sudca získal podľa našej metodológie celkovo 26,5 bodov. Spomedzi 739 hodnotených sudcov sa umiestnil na 110 – 118. mieste. Za kvalitu získal 8,5 z 15 možných bodov, za efektivitu 18 z 25.

Notes

obtained from annual statistical reports of judges pertaining to indicators.

  • 2013 – 05.06.2013 – 06.06.2013 – celokrajské stretnutie sudcov
  • 2013 – 05.06.2013 – 06.06.2013 – celokrajské stretnutie sudcov

Published judgements

  1. Trestný rozkaz – Majetok
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  2. Trestný rozkaz – Majetok
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  3. Uznesenie Judgement was issued on

  4. Trestný rozkaz – Život a zdravie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  5. Trestný rozkaz – Život a zdravie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  6. Trestný rozkaz – Všeobecne nebezpečné a proti…
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  7. Trestný rozkaz – Všeobecne nebezpečné a proti…
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  8. Trestný rozkaz – Všeobecne nebezpečné a proti…
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  9. Trestný rozkaz – Majetok
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  10. Trestný rozkaz – Všeobecne nebezpečné a proti…
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

More judgements

Upcoming hearings

  1. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, prečin usmrtenia § 149/1, 2… Hearing will be held on

    Court – Okresný súd Galanta
    Judge – JUDr. Miroslav Studenčan
    Defendant – R. F.
  2. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, zločin nedovoleného… Hearing will be held on

    Court – Okresný súd Galanta
    Judge – JUDr. Miroslav Studenčan
    Defendant – K. R.
  3. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, obzvlášť závažný zločin… Hearing will be held on

    Court – Okresný súd Galanta
    Judge – JUDr. Miroslav Studenčan
    Defendant – P. J.
  4. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, pokračovací prečin krádeže… Hearing will be held on

    Court – Okresný súd Galanta
    Judge – JUDr. Miroslav Studenčan
    Defendant – E. P.
  5. Hlavné pojednávanie s rozhodnutím, prečin marenia výkonu… Hearing will be held on

    Court – Okresný súd Galanta
    Judge – JUDr. Miroslav Studenčan
    Defendant – N. I.
  6. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, prečin… Hearing will be held on

    Court – Okresný súd Galanta
    Judge – JUDr. Miroslav Studenčan
    Defendant – H. P.
  7. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, prečin nezaplatenia dane a… Hearing will be held on

    Court – Okresný súd Galanta
    Judge – JUDr. Miroslav Studenčan
    Defendant – E. M.
  8. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, prečin usmrtenia… Hearing will be held on

    Court – Okresný súd Galanta
    Judge – JUDr. Miroslav Studenčan
    Defendant – I. J.
  9. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, zločin vydierania § 189/1, §… Hearing will be held on

    Court – Okresný súd Galanta
    Judge – JUDr. Miroslav Studenčan
    Defendant – F. I.
  10. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, prečin neopráv.nakladania s… Hearing will be held on

More hearings

Past hearings

  1. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, zločin neodvedenia dane §… Hearing was held on

    Court – Okresný súd Galanta
    Judge – JUDr. Miroslav Studenčan
    Defendant – R. A.
  2. Hlavné pojednávanie s rozhodnutím, Prečin krádeže §212/1… Hearing was held on

    Court – Okresný súd Galanta
    Judge – JUDr. Miroslav Studenčan
    Defendant – Q. W.
  3. Verejné zasadnutie s rozhodnutím, Obžaloba Hearing was held on

    Court – Okresný súd Galanta
    Judge – JUDr. Miroslav Studenčan
    Defendant – O. N.
  4. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, Obnova konania Hearing was held on

  5. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, zločin podvodu §221/1… Hearing was held on

    Court – Okresný súd Galanta
    Judge – JUDr. Miroslav Studenčan
    Defendant – M. Q.
  6. Hlavné pojednávanie s rozhodnutím, prečin marenia výkonu… Hearing was held on

  7. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, prečin podvodu §221/1,§221/2… Hearing was held on

    Court – Okresný súd Galanta
    Judge – JUDr. Miroslav Studenčan
    Defendant – H. M.
  8. Verejné zasadnutie s rozhodnutím, prečin zanedbania… Hearing was held on

    Court – Okresný súd Galanta
    Judge – JUDr. Miroslav Studenčan
    Defendant – G. M.
  9. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, prečin podvod §221/1 TZ Hearing was held on

  10. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, zločin týrania blízkej a… Hearing was held on

    Court – Okresný súd Galanta
    Judge – JUDr. Miroslav Studenčan
    Defendant – Q. Z.
More hearings

Information regarding the court were obtained from the judge list, which was most recently updated on . The information may have been additionally supplemented by the data retrieved from property declarations and statistical reports.