JUDr. Sylvia Szabadošová

  1. Active judge at the court Okresný súd Prešov, we register 6,136 hearings and 4,631 judgements.

Close persons acknowledged in property declarations in years 2012 and 2011.

Close persons acknowledged in property declaration in a year 2012:

  • Psychológ Mgr. Ivo Szabadoš, ÚVV Prešov.

Close persons acknowledged in property declaration in a year 2011:

  • Psychológ Mgr. Ivo Szabadoš, ÚVV Prešov.

Indicators for 2021

Overall evaluation of the judge is excellent.
Incoming cases for the judge in 2021 were mostly from civil agenda. Judge's decrees in 2021 were mostly from civil agenda.

Component – Quality

We register 71.20% decrees for the judge, which are confirmed by the higher court in case of an appeal. The median amongst judges is 68,9%. We register 375 decrees concerning appeals.
In this dimension the judge belongs to the group that is average.

Component – Effectivity

The judge had overal appointment of cases of 283.73% in 2021. The median amongst judges is 107,9%.
Anticipated time of the judge was based on data from 2021 127 days. Median amongst judges was 224,3 days.
In 2021 the judge decided 1081 cases in the observed agendas.
In this dimension the judge belongs to the group that is better than average.

Component – Productivity

Weighted product of the judge in 2021 was 460.632. Median amongst judges was 248,1.
For the judge we register 380 unresolved cases at the end of 2021. From those 62.11% are restant cases. Median amongst judges was 39,34% of restant cases from the total number of unresolved cases.
In this dimension the judge belongs to the group that is better than average.

Overall Evaluation
Evaluation on a scale from 0 to 10.

Indicators for 2017

Number of Constitutional Court decisions against the judge:

  • Issued – 1
  • Delays prior to case assignment – 0

The judge was mostly assigned to Family Agenda. The judge mostly issued judgements in Family Agenda.

The judge worked 1474 days in the period and was assigned on average 151 cases per 100 days in main agendas.

Evaluation

In 2017, the judge received in total 25 from 40 possible points and ranked on 156 – 178. place of 651 evaluated judges.

  • Quality – 12 out of 15 points
  • Effectivity – 13 out of 25 points

Chart Comparison

Legend
Advanced Comparison
The chart is most useful for comparisons of judges at the same or similar courts, and those who decide cases in the same or similar agenda. Specific courts and agendas have an impact on the overall performance of judges. Simply put, commercial judge from Bratislava and criminal judge from Rožňava decide uncomparable cases.

Quality Indicators

The judge's judgements were on appeal affirmed in 80.7% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 67.8%.

  • Number of Appellate Decisions – 218
  • Number of Affirmed Decisions – 176

An appeal against the judge's judgements is filed in 7% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 7.9%.

Of the total number of the judge's judgements 1.4% is changed or reversed. The average in the same agenda is 2.5%.

Effectivity Indicators

Estimated average length of proceedings is 266.4 days. The average at the end of 2017 was 340.8 days.

The judge had 324 unresolved cases at the end of 2017. The average was 192.7 cases.

The judge had 148 restant cases at the end of 2017. The average was 111.7. This represents 45.7% of the judge's unresolved cases. Average was 54.1%.

In 2017, the judge was able to resolve 123% of assigned cases. Average was 141.8%.

Indicators for 2015

Number of Constitutional Court decisions against the judge:

  • Issued – 0
  • Delays prior to case assignment – 0

The judge was mostly assigned to Family Agenda. The judge mostly issued judgements in Family Agenda.

The judge worked 1050 days in the period and was assigned on average 110 cases per 100 days in main agendas.

Evaluation

In 2015, the judge received in total 23.5 from 40 possible points and ranked on 286 – 303. place of 738 evaluated judges.

  • Quality – 12 out of 15 points
  • Effectivity – 11.5 out of 25 points

Chart Comparison

Legend
Advanced Comparison
The chart is most useful for comparisons of judges at the same or similar courts, and those who decide cases in the same or similar agenda. Specific courts and agendas have an impact on the overall performance of judges. Simply put, commercial judge from Bratislava and criminal judge from Rožňava decide uncomparable cases.

Quality Indicators

The judge's judgements were on appeal affirmed in 82% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 67.3%.

  • Number of Appellate Decisions – 139
  • Number of Affirmed Decisions – 114

An appeal against the judge's judgements is filed in 6.4% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 7.6%.

Of the total number of the judge's judgements 1.2% is changed or reversed. The average in the same agenda is 2.5%.

Effectivity Indicators

Estimated average length of proceedings is 304 days. The average at the end of 2015 was 339 days.

The judge had 347 unresolved cases at the end of 2015. The average was 377 cases.

The judge had 100 restant cases at the end of 2015. The average was 150. This represents 28.8% of the judge's unresolved cases. Average was 42.6%.

In 2015, the judge was able to resolve 76.1% of assigned cases. Average was 97.1%.

Indicators for 2013

The number of Constitutional court judgements against the judges – issued 0 and delays prior to case assignment 0.

For the judge we register performance data for years 2011 – 2013:

Sudcovi bola prideľovaná najmä agenda Starostlivosti o maloletých. Sudca rozhodoval najmä v agende Starostlivosti o maloletých.

The judge in this period worked 619 days and on average was assigned 221 cases in 10 days in main agendas.

Chart Comparison

Legend
Advanced Comparison
The chart is most useful for comparisons of judges at the same or similar courts, and those who decide cases in the same or similar agenda. Specific courts and agendas have an impact on the overall performance of judges. Simply put, commercial judge from Bratislava and criminal judge from Rožňava decide uncomparable cases.

Quality indicators

Rozhodnutie sudcu bolo v prípade odvolania potvrdené v 86,8% prípadoch, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 65,5%.

  • Number of appellate judgements – 76
  • Number of confirmed judgements – 66

Odvolanie proti rozhodnutiam sudcu je podávané v približne 5,5% prípadoch, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 7,2%.

Z celkového počtu rozhodnutí sudcu je zmenených alebo zrušených 0,7%, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 2,5%.

Efficiency indicators

Odhadovaná priemerná dĺžka konania sporu je 150 dní. Priemer bol na konci roka 346 dní.

Sudca mal na konci roka 2013 nevybavených 189 prípadov. Priemer bol 238.

Sudca mal na konci roka 42 reštančných vecí, pričom priemer je 126. To u sudcu tvorí 21,8% z nevybavených vecí. Priemer je 43,4.

Sudca dokázal v roku 2013 vybaviť, k počtu pridelených vecí, 102,9% prípadov. Priemer bol 99,6%.

Sudca získal podľa našej metodológie celkovo 30,5 bodov. Spomedzi 739 hodnotených sudcov sa umiestnil na 30 – 32. mieste. Za kvalitu získal 12,5 z 15 možných bodov, za efektivitu 18 z 25.

Notes

obtained from annual statistical reports of judges pertaining to indicators.

  • 2013 – 7
  • 2012 – 10
  • 2011 – 2; 2012 – 10; 2013 – 7
  • 2011 – 2

Published judgements

  1. Rozsudok – Starostlivosť o maloletých
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  2. Rozsudok – Starostlivosť o maloletých
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  3. Rozsudok – Vyživovacie povinnosti
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  4. Rozsudok – Starostlivosť o maloletých
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  5. Opravné uznesenie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  6. Uznesenie – Starostlivosť o maloletých
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  7. Uznesenie – Ostatné
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  8. Opravné uznesenie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  9. Rozsudok – Osvojenie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  10. Rozsudok – Rozvod
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

More judgements

Upcoming hearings

We do not register any upcoming hearings for the judge yet.

Past hearings

  1. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, o rozvod manželstva a úpravu… Hearing was held on

  2. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, o úpravu práv a povinností +… Hearing was held on

  3. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, o zmenu výchovy Hearing was held on

  4. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, o určenie výživného pre… Hearing was held on

  5. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, o úpravu práv a povinností Hearing was held on

  6. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, o úpravu práv a povinností Hearing was held on

  7. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, o rozvod manželstva a úpravu… Hearing was held on

  8. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, o úpravu práv a povinností +… Hearing was held on

  9. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, o úpravu práv a povinností Hearing was held on

  10. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, o zvýšenie výživného Hearing was held on

More hearings

Information regarding the court were obtained from the judge list, which was most recently updated on . The information may have been additionally supplemented by the data retrieved from property declarations and statistical reports.