Mgr. Katarína Škrovanová

  1. Active judge at the court Okresný súd Senica, we register 1,898 hearings and 2,211 judgements.
  1. The judge has been nominated to function for almost 18 years.

Indicators for 2021

Overall evaluation of the judge is average.
Incoming cases for the judge in 2021 were mostly from civil agenda. Judge's decrees in 2021 were mostly from civil agenda.

Component – Quality

We register 67.10% decrees for the judge, which are confirmed by the higher court in case of an appeal. The median amongst judges is 68,9%. We register 155 decrees concerning appeals.
In this dimension the judge belongs to the group that is average.

Component – Effectivity

The judge had overal appointment of cases of 105.51% in 2021. The median amongst judges is 107,9%.
Anticipated time of the judge was based on data from 2021 254 days. Median amongst judges was 224,3 days.
In 2021 the judge decided 268 cases in the observed agendas.
In this dimension the judge belongs to the group that is average.

Component – Productivity

Weighted product of the judge in 2021 was 244.446. Median amongst judges was 248,1.
For the judge we register 173 unresolved cases at the end of 2021. From those 33.53% are restant cases. Median amongst judges was 39,34% of restant cases from the total number of unresolved cases.
In this dimension the judge belongs to the group that is average.

Overall Evaluation
Evaluation on a scale from 0 to 10.

Indicators for 2017

Number of Constitutional Court decisions against the judge:

  • Issued – 0
  • Delays prior to case assignment – 0

The judge was mostly assigned to Civil agenda. The judge mostly issued judgements in Civil agenda.

The judge worked 823 days in the period and was assigned on average 39 cases per 100 days in main agendas.

Evaluation

In 2017, the judge received in total 25.5 from 40 possible points and ranked on 133 – 155. place of 651 evaluated judges.

  • Quality – 10.5 out of 15 points
  • Effectivity – 15 out of 25 points

Chart Comparison

Legend
Additional Judges
Select other judges for comparison:
Advanced Comparison
The chart is most useful for comparisons of judges at the same or similar courts, and those who decide cases in the same or similar agenda. Specific courts and agendas have an impact on the overall performance of judges. Simply put, commercial judge from Bratislava and criminal judge from Rožňava decide uncomparable cases.

Quality Indicators

The judge's judgements were on appeal affirmed in 78.2% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 68.7%.

  • Number of Appellate Decisions – 55
  • Number of Affirmed Decisions – 43

An appeal against the judge's judgements is filed in 4.8% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 10.1%.

Of the total number of the judge's judgements 1% is changed or reversed. The average in the same agenda is 3.1%.

Effectivity Indicators

Estimated average length of proceedings is 146 days. The average at the end of 2017 was 340.8 days.

The judge had 90 unresolved cases at the end of 2017. The average was 192.7 cases.

The judge had 38 restant cases at the end of 2017. The average was 111.7. This represents 42.2% of the judge's unresolved cases. Average was 54.1%.

In 2017, the judge was able to resolve 110.8% of assigned cases. Average was 141.8%.

Indicators for 2015

We do not register any indicators for the judge yet.

Indicators for 2013

The number of Constitutional court judgements against the judges – issued 0 and delays prior to case assignment 0.

For the judge we register performance data for years 2011 – 2013:

Sudcovi bola prideľovaná najmä Občiansko–právna agenda. Sudca rozhodoval najmä v Občiansko–právnej agende.

The judge in this period worked 539 days and on average was assigned 132 cases in 10 days in main agendas.

Chart Comparison

Legend
Additional Judges
Select other judges for comparison:
Advanced Comparison
The chart is most useful for comparisons of judges at the same or similar courts, and those who decide cases in the same or similar agenda. Specific courts and agendas have an impact on the overall performance of judges. Simply put, commercial judge from Bratislava and criminal judge from Rožňava decide uncomparable cases.

Quality indicators

Rozhodnutie sudcu bolo v prípade odvolania potvrdené v 57,1% prípadoch, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 62,9%.

  • Number of appellate judgements – 21
  • Number of confirmed judgements – 12

Odvolanie proti rozhodnutiam sudcu je podávané v približne 2,4% prípadoch, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 8,9%.

Z celkového počtu rozhodnutí sudcu je zmenených alebo zrušených 1%, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 3,3%.

Efficiency indicators

Odhadovaná priemerná dĺžka konania sporu je 0 dní. Priemer bol na konci roka 346 dní.

Sudca mal na konci roka 2013 nevybavených 0 prípadov. Priemer bol 238.

Dáta o reštančných prípadoch považujeme za málo reprezentatívne a preto ich neprezentujeme.

Dáta o výkonnosti sudcu považujeme za málo reprezentatívne a preto ich neprezentujeme.

Dáta o kvalite a efektivite sudcu nepovažujeme za dostatočné, preto sudcu bodovo nehodnotíme.

Notes

obtained from annual statistical reports of judges pertaining to indicators.

  • 2012 – 23.5.–25.5.2013 – 3 dni Omšenie (celokrajská porada sudcov)
  • 2011 – Seminár – vyporiadanie podielového a bezpodielového vlastníctva (1 deň).; 2012 – 23.5.–25.5.2013 – 3 dni Omšenie (celokrajská porada sudcov)
  • 2011 – Seminár – vyporiadanie podielového a bezpodielového vlastníctva (1 deň).

Published judgements

  1. Uznesenie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  2. Uznesenie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  3. Rozsudok – Vyživovacie povinnosti
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  4. Opravné uznesenie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  5. Rozsudok – Ostatné
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  6. Rozsudok bez odôvodnenia – Vyživovacie povinnosti
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  7. Rozsudok bez odôvodnenia Judgement was issued on

  8. Uznesenie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  9. Uznesenie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  10. Rozsudok – Vyživovacie povinnosti
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

More judgements

Upcoming hearings

We do not register any upcoming hearings for the judge yet.

Past hearings

  1. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, návrh na vydanie PR - 4.200,-… Hearing was held on

  2. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, Návrh na vydanie PR - 20… Hearing was held on

  3. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, zvýšenie výživného Hearing was held on

  4. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, zriadenie vecného bremena Hearing was held on

  5. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, návrh na rozvod Hearing was held on

  6. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, určenie vlastníckeho práva -… Hearing was held on

  7. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, Návrh na vydanie PR - o… Hearing was held on

  8. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, Návrh na vydanie PR - žaloba… Hearing was held on

  9. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, uloženie povinnosti prejaviť… Hearing was held on

  10. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, NÁVRH na vydanie platobného… Hearing was held on

More hearings

Information regarding the court were obtained from the judge list, which was most recently updated on . The information may have been additionally supplemented by the data retrieved from property declarations and statistical reports.