JUDr. Gabriela Brišková

  1. Active judge at the court Krajský súd Trnava, we register 325 hearings and 541 judgements.
  2. Inactive judge at the court Okresný súd Liptovský Mikuláš, we register 1,363 hearings and 1,730 judgements.
    Note: od 1. júla 2015 do 31. júna 2016 je dočasne pridelená na KS v Trnave.
  1. The judge has been nominated to function for about 24 years, bez časového obmedzenia funkcie.
  2. The judge has been nominated to function for about 28 years, bez časového obmedzenia funkcie.

Indicators for 2021

We do not register any indicators for the judge yet.

Indicators for 2017

We do not register any indicators for the judge yet.

Indicators for 2015

Number of Constitutional Court decisions against the judge:

  • Issued – 0
  • Delays prior to case assignment – 0

The judge was mostly assigned to Civil agenda. The judge mostly issued judgements in Civil agenda.

The judge worked 923 days in the period and was assigned on average 41 cases per 100 days in main agendas.

Evaluation

In 2015, the judge received in total 28.5 from 40 possible points and ranked on 91 – 106. place of 738 evaluated judges.

  • Quality – 12 out of 15 points
  • Effectivity – 16.5 out of 25 points

Chart Comparison

Legend
Advanced Comparison
The chart is most useful for comparisons of judges at the same or similar courts, and those who decide cases in the same or similar agenda. Specific courts and agendas have an impact on the overall performance of judges. Simply put, commercial judge from Bratislava and criminal judge from Rožňava decide uncomparable cases.

Quality Indicators

The judge's judgements were on appeal affirmed in 80.8% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 67.1%.

  • Number of Appellate Decisions – 292
  • Number of Affirmed Decisions – 236

An appeal against the judge's judgements is filed in 15.6% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 9.3%.

Of the total number of the judge's judgements 3% is changed or reversed. The average in the same agenda is 3%.

Effectivity Indicators

Estimated average length of proceedings is 370 days. The average at the end of 2015 was 339 days.

The judge had 245 unresolved cases at the end of 2015. The average was 377 cases.

The judge had 97 restant cases at the end of 2015. The average was 150. This represents 39.6% of the judge's unresolved cases. Average was 42.6%.

In 2015, the judge was able to resolve 126.7% of assigned cases. Average was 97.1%.

Indicators for 2013

The number of Constitutional court judgements against the judges – issued 0 and delays prior to case assignment 0.

For the judge we register performance data for years 2011 – 2013:

Sudcovi bola prideľovaná najmä Občiansko–právna agenda. Sudca rozhodoval najmä v Občiansko–právnej agende.

The judge in this period worked 621 days and on average was assigned 214 cases in 10 days in main agendas.

Chart Comparison

Legend
Advanced Comparison
The chart is most useful for comparisons of judges at the same or similar courts, and those who decide cases in the same or similar agenda. Specific courts and agendas have an impact on the overall performance of judges. Simply put, commercial judge from Bratislava and criminal judge from Rožňava decide uncomparable cases.

Quality indicators

Rozhodnutie sudcu bolo v prípade odvolania potvrdené v 72,7% prípadoch, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 62,9%.

  • Number of appellate judgements – 150
  • Number of confirmed judgements – 109

Odvolanie proti rozhodnutiam sudcu je podávané v približne 12,5% prípadoch, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 8,9%.

Z celkového počtu rozhodnutí sudcu je zmenených alebo zrušených 3,4%, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 3,3%.

Efficiency indicators

Odhadovaná priemerná dĺžka konania sporu je 360 dní. Priemer bol na konci roka 346 dní.

Sudca mal na konci roka 2013 nevybavených 409 prípadov. Priemer bol 238.

Sudca mal na konci roka 179 reštančných vecí, pričom priemer je 126. To u sudcu tvorí 41,9% z nevybavených vecí. Priemer je 43,4.

Sudca dokázal v roku 2013 vybaviť, k počtu pridelených vecí, 101,2% prípadov. Priemer bol 99,6%.

Sudca získal podľa našej metodológie celkovo 19,5 bodov. Spomedzi 739 hodnotených sudcov sa umiestnil na 458 – 472. mieste. Za kvalitu získal 8,75 z 15 možných bodov, za efektivitu 10,75 z 25.

Notes

obtained from annual statistical reports of judges pertaining to indicators.

  • 2013 – 22.–23.4.2013– JP Omšenie – školenie – sory o vl.právo 22.–23.5.2013– –/– – Seminár 19.–21.11.2013 –/– – Seminár – prísl.súdu – Brusel 1,2
  • 2012 – 19.20.1.2012 – Omšenie – Seminár – Ochrana osobnosti 21.11.2012 – Omšenie – Seminár – Burusel1, Rím I,II 12.12.2012– Omšenie – Seminár – Princípy vnútroštát. aplik.práva EÚ
  • 2011 – 28.2.–1.3.2011 – Seminár – 2011/KEP 15 13.–14.6.2011 – Seminár 5.–61.9.2011 – Seminár; 2012 – 19.20.1.2012 – Omšenie – Seminár – Ochrana osobnosti 21.11.2012 – Omšenie – Seminár – Burusel1, Rím I,II 12.12.2012– Omšenie – Seminár – Princípy vnútroštát. aplik.práva EÚ; 2013 – 22.–23.4.2013– JP Omšenie – školenie – sory o vl.právo 22.–23.5.2013– –/– – Seminár 19.–21.11.2013 –/– – Seminár – prísl.súdu – Brusel 1,2
  • 2011 – 28.2.–1.3.2011 – Seminár – 2011/KEP 15 13.–14.6.2011 – Seminár 5.–61.9.2011 – Seminár

Published judgements

  1. Uznesenie
    Zrušujúce
    Judgement was issued on

  2. Uznesenie – Ostatné
    Potvrdzujúce
    Judgement was issued on

  3. Uznesenie – Ostatné
    Potvrdzujúce
    Judgement was issued on

  4. Uznesenie – Ostatné
    Zrušujúce
    Judgement was issued on

  5. Uznesenie – Ostatné
    Zrušujúce
    Judgement was issued on

  6. Rozsudok – Ostatné
    Potvrdzujúce
    Judgement was issued on

  7. Rozsudok – Ostatné
    Potvrdzujúce
    Judgement was issued on

  8. Uznesenie – Ostatné
    Potvrdzujúce
    Judgement was issued on

  9. Uznesenie – Ostatné
    Potvrdzujúce
    Judgement was issued on

  10. Uznesenie – Ostatné
    Zrušujúce
    Judgement was issued on

More judgements

Upcoming hearings

We do not register any upcoming hearings for the judge yet.

Past hearings

  1. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, dovolaní Hearing was held on

  2. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, určenie vlastníckeho práva k… Hearing was held on

  3. Verejné vyhlásenie rozsudku, zaplatenie 4.405,35 € s prísl. Hearing was held on

  4. Verejné vyhlásenie rozsudku, vydanie bezdôvodného… Hearing was held on

  5. Verejné vyhlásenie rozsudku, vydanie bezdôvodného… Hearing was held on

  6. Verejné vyhlásenie rozsudku, zaplatenie 761,04 € s prísl. Hearing was held on

  7. Verejné vyhlásenie rozsudku, vydanie bezdôvodného… Hearing was held on

  8. Verejné vyhlásenie rozsudku, určenie neplatnosti dohody o… Hearing was held on

  9. Verejné vyhlásenie rozsudku, zaplatenie 1.575,77 € s prísl. Hearing was held on

  10. Verejné vyhlásenie rozsudku, úpravu výkonu rodičovských… Hearing was held on

More hearings

Information regarding the court were obtained from the judge list, which was most recently updated on . The information may have been additionally supplemented by the data retrieved from property declarations and statistical reports.