Close persons acknowledged in property declarations in years 2012 and 2011.
Close persons acknowledged in property declaration in a year 2012:
Close persons acknowledged in property declaration in a year 2011:
Notes about the data obtained from annual statistical reports of judges.
Overall evaluation of the judge is average.
Incoming cases for the judge in 2021 were mostly from civil agenda. Judge's decrees in 2021 were mostly from civil agenda.
We register 46.44% decrees for the judge, which are confirmed by the higher court in case of an appeal. The median amongst judges is 68,9%.
We register 267 decrees concerning appeals.
In this dimension the judge belongs to the group that is worse than average.
The judge had overal appointment of cases of 118.81% in 2021. The median amongst judges is 107,9%.
Anticipated time of the judge was based on data from 2021 369 days. Median amongst judges was 224,3 days.
In 2021 the judge decided 379 cases in the observed agendas.
In this dimension the judge belongs to the group that is average.
Weighted product of the judge in 2021 was 378.892. Median amongst judges was 248,1.
For the judge we register 424 unresolved cases at the end of 2021. From those 60.38% are restant cases. Median amongst judges was 39,34% of restant cases from the total number of unresolved cases.
In this dimension the judge belongs to the group that is better than average.
Number of Constitutional Court decisions against the judge:
The judge was mostly assigned to Civil agenda. The judge mostly issued judgements in Civil agenda.
The judge worked 1268 days in the period and was assigned on average 17 cases per 100 days in main agendas.
In 2017, the judge received in total 1 from 40 possible points and ranked on 651. place of 651 evaluated judges.
The judge's judgements were on appeal affirmed in 45.8% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 68.7%.
An appeal against the judge's judgements is filed in 8.9% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 10.1%.
Of the total number of the judge's judgements 4.8% is changed or reversed. The average in the same agenda is 3.1%.
Estimated average length of proceedings is 894.8 days. The average at the end of 2017 was 340.8 days.
The judge had 304 unresolved cases at the end of 2017. The average was 192.7 cases.
The judge had 231 restant cases at the end of 2017. The average was 111.7. This represents 76% of the judge's unresolved cases. Average was 54.1%.
In 2017, the judge was able to resolve 30.8% of assigned cases. Average was 141.8%.
Number of Constitutional Court decisions against the judge:
The judge was mostly assigned to Civil agenda. The judge mostly issued judgements in Civil agenda.
The judge worked 1068 days in the period and was assigned on average 16 cases per 100 days in main agendas.
In 2015, the judge received in total 8.5 from 40 possible points and ranked on 722 – 723. place of 738 evaluated judges.
The judge's judgements were on appeal affirmed in 47.7% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 67.1%.
An appeal against the judge's judgements is filed in 8.9% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 9.3%.
Of the total number of the judge's judgements 4.7% is changed or reversed. The average in the same agenda is 3%.
Estimated average length of proceedings is 529 days. The average at the end of 2015 was 339 days.
The judge had 585 unresolved cases at the end of 2015. The average was 377 cases.
The judge had 297 restant cases at the end of 2015. The average was 150. This represents 50.8% of the judge's unresolved cases. Average was 42.6%.
In 2015, the judge was able to resolve 86.1% of assigned cases. Average was 97.1%.
The number of Constitutional court judgements against the judges – issued 3 and delays prior to case assignment 1.
For the judge we register performance data for years 2011 – 2013:
Sudcovi bola prideľovaná najmä Občiansko–právna agenda. Sudca rozhodoval najmä v Občiansko–právnej agende.
The judge in this period worked 641 days and on average was assigned 133 cases in 10 days in main agendas.
Rozhodnutie sudcu bolo v prípade odvolania potvrdené v 50,9% prípadoch, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 62,9%.
Odvolanie proti rozhodnutiam sudcu je podávané v približne 12,7% prípadoch, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 8,9%.
Z celkového počtu rozhodnutí sudcu je zmenených alebo zrušených 6,3%, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 3,3%.
Odhadovaná priemerná dĺžka konania sporu je 466 dní. Priemer bol na konci roka 346 dní.
Sudca mal na konci roka 2013 nevybavených 398 prípadov. Priemer bol 238.
Sudca mal na konci roka 265 reštančných vecí, pričom priemer je 126. To u sudcu tvorí 52,4% z nevybavených vecí. Priemer je 43,4.
Sudca dokázal v roku 2013 vybaviť, k počtu pridelených vecí, 86,7% prípadov. Priemer bol 99,6%.
Sudca získal podľa našej metodológie celkovo 10,5 bodov. Spomedzi 739 hodnotených sudcov sa umiestnil na 706 – 707. mieste. Za kvalitu získal 3,75 z 15 možných bodov, za efektivitu 6,75 z 25.
Notes about the data obtained from annual statistical reports of judges pertaining to indicators.
Information regarding the court were obtained from the judge list, which was most recently updated on . The information may have been additionally supplemented by the data retrieved from property declarations and statistical reports.