JUDr. Peter Šuťak

  1. Active judge at the court Okresný súd Prešov, we register 1,087 hearings and 105 judgements.
  1. The judge has been nominated to function for almost 16 years.

Close persons acknowledged in property declarations in years 2014, 2013, 2012, and 2011.

Close persons acknowledged in property declaration in a year 2014:

Close persons acknowledged in property declaration in a year 2013:

Close persons acknowledged in property declaration in a year 2012:

Close persons acknowledged in property declaration in a year 2011:

Indicators for 2017

Number of Constitutional Court decisions against the judge:

  • Issued – 1
  • Delays prior to case assignment – 0

The judge was mostly assigned to Criminal agenda. The judge mostly issued judgements in translation missing: en.judges.indicators_2015.basic.decided_agenda.trestná.

The judge worked 1500 days in the period and was assigned on average 116 cases per 100 days in main agendas.

Evaluation

In 2017, the judge received in total 19.5 from 40 possible points and ranked on 411 – 435. place of 651 evaluated judges.

  • Quality – 6 out of 15 points
  • Effectivity – 13.5 out of 25 points

Chart Comparison

Legend
Advanced Comparison
The chart is most useful for comparisons of judges at the same or similar courts, and those who decide cases in the same or similar agenda. Specific courts and agendas have an impact on the overall performance of judges. Simply put, commercial judge from Bratislava and criminal judge from Rožňava decide uncomparable cases.

Quality Indicators

The judge's judgements were on appeal affirmed in 62.8% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 66%.

  • Number of Appellate Decisions – 250
  • Number of Affirmed Decisions – 157

An appeal against the judge's judgements is filed in 10.1% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 8.7%.

Of the total number of the judge's judgements 3.8% is changed or reversed. The average in the same agenda is 2.9%.

Effectivity Indicators

Estimated average length of proceedings is 167.3 days. The average at the end of 2017 was 340.8 days.

The judge had 165 unresolved cases at the end of 2017. The average was 192.7 cases.

The judge had 91 restant cases at the end of 2017. The average was 111.7. This represents 55.2% of the judge's unresolved cases. Average was 54.1%.

In 2017, the judge was able to resolve 101.7% of assigned cases. Average was 141.8%.

Indicators for 2015

Number of Constitutional Court decisions against the judge:

  • Issued – 1
  • Delays prior to case assignment – 0

The judge was mostly assigned to Criminal agenda. The judge mostly issued judgements in Criminal agenda.

The judge worked 1075 days in the period and was assigned on average 82 cases per 100 days in main agendas.

Evaluation

In 2015, the judge received in total 22 from 40 possible points and ranked on 345 – 366. place of 738 evaluated judges.

  • Quality – 6 out of 15 points
  • Effectivity – 16 out of 25 points

Quality Indicators

The judge's judgements were on appeal affirmed in 62% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 63.8%.

  • Number of Appellate Decisions – 171
  • Number of Affirmed Decisions – 106

An appeal against the judge's judgements is filed in 9.7% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 8.1%.

Of the total number of the judge's judgements 3.7% is changed or reversed. The average in the same agenda is 3%.

Effectivity Indicators

Estimated average length of proceedings is 137 days. The average at the end of 2015 was 339 days.

The judge had 133 unresolved cases at the end of 2015. The average was 377 cases.

The judge had 68 restant cases at the end of 2015. The average was 150. This represents 51.1% of the judge's unresolved cases. Average was 42.6%.

In 2015, the judge was able to resolve 99.7% of assigned cases. Average was 97.1%.

Indicators for 2013

The number of Constitutional court judgements against the judges – issued 1 and delays prior to case assignment 0.

For the judge we register performance data for years 2011 – 2013:

Sudcovi bola prideľovaná najmä Trestná agenda. Sudca rozhodoval najmä v Trestnej agende.

The judge in this period worked 660 days and on average was assigned 70 cases in 10 days in main agendas.

Quality indicators

Rozhodnutie sudcu bolo v prípade odvolania potvrdené v 35,6% prípadoch, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 52,3%.

  • Number of appellate judgements – 59
  • Number of confirmed judgements – 21

Odvolanie proti rozhodnutiam sudcu je podávané v približne 11,9% prípadoch, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 8,4%.

Z celkového počtu rozhodnutí sudcu je zmenených alebo zrušených 7,6%, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 4%.

Efficiency indicators

Odhadovaná priemerná dĺžka konania sporu je 117 dní. Priemer bol na konci roka 346 dní.

Sudca mal na konci roka 2013 nevybavených 54 prípadov. Priemer bol 238.

Sudca mal na konci roka 48 reštančných vecí, pričom priemer je 126. To u sudcu tvorí 63,2% z nevybavených vecí. Priemer je 43,4.

Sudca dokázal v roku 2013 vybaviť, k počtu pridelených vecí, 98,8% prípadov. Priemer bol 99,6%.

Sudca získal podľa našej metodológie celkovo 18,25 bodov. Spomedzi 739 hodnotených sudcov sa umiestnil na 509 – 518. mieste. Za kvalitu získal 2,5 z 15 možných bodov, za efektivitu 15,75 z 25.

Notes

obtained from annual statistical reports of judges pertaining to indicators.

  • 2013 – 3
  • 2012 – 2
  • 2011 – 0; 2012 – 2; 2013 – 3
  • 2011 – 0

Published judgements

  1. Trestný rozkaz – Všeobecne nebezpečné a proti…
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  2. Trestný rozkaz – Všeobecne nebezpečné a proti…
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  3. Trestný rozkaz – Všeobecne nebezpečné a proti…
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  4. Trestný rozkaz – Všeobecne nebezpečné a proti…
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  5. Trestný rozkaz – Majetok
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  6. Trestný rozkaz – Majetok
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  7. Trestný rozkaz – Iné práva a slobody
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  8. Uznesenie – Všeobecne nebezpečné a proti životnému…
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  9. Uznesenie – Život a zdravie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  10. Uznesenie – Život a zdravie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

More judgements

Upcoming hearings

  1. Hlavné pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, § 199 ods.1 Tr.zák. Hearing will be held on

    Court – Okresný súd Prešov
    Judge – JUDr. Peter Šuťak
    Defendant – L. W.
  2. Hlavné pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, § 277 ods.1 Tr.zák. a… Hearing will be held on

    Court – Okresný súd Prešov
    Judge – JUDr. Peter Šuťak
    Defendant – E. A.
  3. Hlavné pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, § 149 ods. 1 Tr. zák. Hearing will be held on

    Court – Okresný súd Prešov
    Judge – JUDr. Peter Šuťak
    Defendant – W. M.
  4. Hlavné pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, § 213 ods. 1 Tr. zák.… Hearing will be held on

    Court – Okresný súd Prešov
    Judge – JUDr. Peter Šuťak
    Defendant – O. Z.
  5. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, obnovu konania Hearing will be held on

  6. Hlavné pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, § 364 ods. 1 Tr. zák.… Hearing will be held on

    Court – Okresný súd Prešov
    Judge – JUDr. Peter Šuťak
    Defendant – Q. H.
  7. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, § 221 ods.1 Tr.zák. a iné Hearing will be held on

    Court – Okresný súd Prešov
    Judge – JUDr. Peter Šuťak
    Defendant – X. S.
  8. Hlavné pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, § 158 Tr. zák. Hearing will be held on

    Court – Okresný súd Prešov
    Judge – JUDr. Peter Šuťak
    Defendant – C. G.
  9. Hlavné pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, § 212 ods. 1 Tr.zák. a… Hearing will be held on

    Court – Okresný súd Prešov
    Judge – JUDr. Peter Šuťak
    Defendant – N. C.
  10. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, § 225 ods.2 Tr.zák. a iné Hearing will be held on

    Court – Okresný súd Prešov
    Judge – JUDr. Peter Šuťak
    Defendant – U. Z.
More hearings

Past hearings

  1. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, § 277 ods.1 Tr.zák. a iné Hearing was held on

    Court – Okresný súd Prešov
    Judge – JUDr. Peter Šuťak
    Defendant – X. G.
  2. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, § 211 ods. 1 Tr. zák. a iné Hearing was held on

    Court – Okresný súd Prešov
    Judge – JUDr. Peter Šuťak
    Defendant – R. G.
  3. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, § 199 ods. 1 Tr. zák. a iné Hearing was held on

    Court – Okresný súd Prešov
    Judge – JUDr. Peter Šuťak
    Defendant – O. S.
  4. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, § 155 ods. 1 Tr. zák. Hearing was held on

    Court – Okresný súd Prešov
    Judge – JUDr. Peter Šuťak
    Defendant – V. X.
  5. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, podmienečné prepustenie Hearing was held on

    Court – Okresný súd Prešov
    Judge – JUDr. Peter Šuťak
    Defendant – Z. I.
  6. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, podmienečné prepustenie Hearing was held on

    Court – Okresný súd Prešov
    Judge – JUDr. Peter Šuťak
    Defendant – R. P.
  7. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, § 149 ods. 1 Tr. zák. Hearing was held on

    Court – Okresný súd Prešov
    Judge – JUDr. Peter Šuťak
    Defendant – L. J.
  8. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, § 213 ods. 1 Tr. zák. a iné Hearing was held on

    Court – Okresný súd Prešov
    Judge – JUDr. Peter Šuťak
    Defendant – X. J.
  9. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, § 212 ods.1 Tr.zák. Hearing was held on

    Court – Okresný súd Prešov
    Judge – JUDr. Peter Šuťak
    Defendant – V. Y.
  10. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, obnovu konania Hearing was held on

More hearings

Information regarding the court were obtained from the judge list, which was most recently updated on . The information may have been additionally supplemented by the data retrieved from property declarations and statistical reports.