JUDr. Marián Tengely

  1. Active chairman at the court Okresný súd Rožňava, we register 1,512 hearings and 1,683 judgements.
    Note: .

obtained from annual statistical reports of judges.

Indicators for 2017

Number of Constitutional Court decisions against the judge:

  • Issued – 0
  • Delays prior to case assignment – 0

The judge was mostly assigned to Civil agenda. The judge mostly issued judgements in Civil agenda.

The judge worked 194 days in the period and was assigned on average 3 cases per 100 days in main agendas.

Evaluation

In 2017, the judge received in total 34 from 40 possible points and ranked on 6. place of 651 evaluated judges.

  • Quality – 15 out of 15 points
  • Effectivity – 19 out of 25 points

Chart Comparison

Legend
Advanced Comparison
The chart is most useful for comparisons of judges at the same or similar courts, and those who decide cases in the same or similar agenda. Specific courts and agendas have an impact on the overall performance of judges. Simply put, commercial judge from Bratislava and criminal judge from Rožňava decide uncomparable cases.

Quality Indicators

The judge's judgements were on appeal affirmed in 89.1% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 68.7%.

  • Number of Appellate Decisions – 119
  • Number of Affirmed Decisions – 106

An appeal against the judge's judgements is filed in 73.5% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 10.1%.

Of the total number of the judge's judgements 8% is changed or reversed. The average in the same agenda is 3.1%.

Effectivity Indicators

Estimated average length of proceedings is 198.3 days. The average at the end of 2017 was 340.8 days.

The judge had 88 unresolved cases at the end of 2017. The average was 192.7 cases.

The judge had 71 restant cases at the end of 2017. The average was 111.7. This represents 80.7% of the judge's unresolved cases. Average was 54.1%.

In 2017, the judge was able to resolve 241.8% of assigned cases. Average was 141.8%.

Indicators for 2015

Number of Constitutional Court decisions against the judge:

  • Issued – 0
  • Delays prior to case assignment – 0

The judge was mostly assigned to Civil agenda. The judge mostly issued judgements in Civil agenda.

The judge worked 1077 days in the period and was assigned on average 27 cases per 100 days in main agendas.

Evaluation

In 2015, the judge received in total 24 from 40 possible points and ranked on 262 – 285. place of 738 evaluated judges.

  • Quality – 10.5 out of 15 points
  • Effectivity – 13.5 out of 25 points

Quality Indicators

The judge's judgements were on appeal affirmed in 76% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 67.1%.

  • Number of Appellate Decisions – 501
  • Number of Affirmed Decisions – 381

An appeal against the judge's judgements is filed in 23.4% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 9.3%.

Of the total number of the judge's judgements 5.6% is changed or reversed. The average in the same agenda is 3%.

Effectivity Indicators

Estimated average length of proceedings is 434 days. The average at the end of 2015 was 339 days.

The judge had 722 unresolved cases at the end of 2015. The average was 377 cases.

The judge had 505 restant cases at the end of 2015. The average was 150. This represents 69.9% of the judge's unresolved cases. Average was 42.6%.

In 2015, the judge was able to resolve 128.9% of assigned cases. Average was 97.1%.

Indicators for 2013

The number of Constitutional court judgements against the judges – issued 0 and delays prior to case assignment 0.

For the judge we register performance data for years 2011 – 2013:

Sudcovi bola prideľovaná najmä Občiansko–právna agenda. Sudca rozhodoval najmä v Občiansko–právnej agende.

The judge in this period worked 654 days and on average was assigned 221 cases in 10 days in main agendas.

Quality indicators

Rozhodnutie sudcu bolo v prípade odvolania potvrdené v 75% prípadoch, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 62,9%.

  • Number of appellate judgements – 80
  • Number of confirmed judgements – 60

Odvolanie proti rozhodnutiam sudcu je podávané v približne 9% prípadoch, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 8,9%.

Z celkového počtu rozhodnutí sudcu je zmenených alebo zrušených 2,3%, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 3,3%.

Efficiency indicators

Odhadovaná priemerná dĺžka konania sporu je 561 dní. Priemer bol na konci roka 346 dní.

Sudca mal na konci roka 2013 nevybavených 683 prípadov. Priemer bol 238.

Sudca mal na konci roka 462 reštančných vecí, pričom priemer je 126. To u sudcu tvorí 64,4% z nevybavených vecí. Priemer je 43,4.

Sudca dokázal v roku 2013 vybaviť, k počtu pridelených vecí, 79,1% prípadov. Priemer bol 99,6%.

Sudca získal podľa našej metodológie celkovo 13,75 bodov. Spomedzi 739 hodnotených sudcov sa umiestnil na 654 – 658. mieste. Za kvalitu získal 9,75 z 15 možných bodov, za efektivitu 4 z 25.

Notes

obtained from annual statistical reports of judges pertaining to indicators.

  • 2013 – Účasť na seminári 2 pracovné dni
  • 2012 – Účasť na seminári 1 pracovný deň.; 2013 – Účasť na seminári 2 pracovné dni
  • 2012 – Účasť na seminári 1 pracovný deň.

Published judgements

  1. Platobný rozkaz – Spotrebiteľské zmluvy
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  2. Platobný rozkaz – Ostatné
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  3. Platobný rozkaz – Ostatné
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  4. Platobný rozkaz – Ostatné
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  5. Opravné uznesenie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  6. Platobný rozkaz – Ostatné
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  7. Platobný rozkaz – Ostatné
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  8. Platobný rozkaz – Ostatné
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  9. Platobný rozkaz – Ostatné
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  10. Platobný rozkaz – Ostatné
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

More judgements

Upcoming hearings

We do not register any upcoming hearings for the judge yet.

Past hearings

  1. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, Obnovu konania 5C 32/07 Hearing was held on

  2. Verejné vyhlásenie rozsudku, Uplatnenie pohľadávky 36,- € s… Hearing was held on

  3. Verejné vyhlásenie rozsudku, zaplatenie 3.440,- € s prísl. Hearing was held on

  4. Verejné vyhlásenie rozsudku, zaplatenie 3.059,23 € s prísl. Hearing was held on

  5. Verejné vyhlásenie rozsudku, Uplatnenie pohľadávky 0,- € s… Hearing was held on

  6. Verejné vyhlásenie rozsudku, Uplatnenie pohľadávky 429,- €… Hearing was held on

  7. Verejné vyhlásenie rozsudku, Uplatnenie pohľadávky 746,04 €… Hearing was held on

  8. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, zaplatenie 2.540,92 € s prísl. Hearing was held on

  9. Verejné vyhlásenie rozsudku, Uplatnenie pohľadávky 0,- € s… Hearing was held on

  10. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, zaplatenie 1 769,73 € s prísl. Hearing was held on

More hearings

Information regarding the court were obtained from the judge list, which was most recently updated on . The information may have been additionally supplemented by the data retrieved from property declarations and statistical reports.