JUDr. Eva Uličná

  1. Active judge at the court Okresný súd Liptovský Mikuláš, we register 2,830 hearings and 2,673 judgements.
  1. The judge has been nominated to function for about 16 years.

Indicators for 2021

Overall evaluation of the judge is above average.
Incoming cases for the judge in 2021 were mostly from civil agenda. Judge's decrees in 2021 were mostly from civil agenda.

Component – Quality

We register 80.90% decrees for the judge, which are confirmed by the higher court in case of an appeal. The median amongst judges is 68,9%. We register 513 decrees concerning appeals.
In this dimension the judge belongs to the group that is better than average.

Component – Effectivity

The judge had overal appointment of cases of 111.59% in 2021. The median amongst judges is 107,9%.
Anticipated time of the judge was based on data from 2021 238 days. Median amongst judges was 224,3 days.
In 2021 the judge decided 183 cases in the observed agendas.
In this dimension the judge belongs to the group that is average.

Component – Productivity

Weighted product of the judge in 2021 was 178.162. Median amongst judges was 248,1.
For the judge we register 123 unresolved cases at the end of 2021. From those 42.28% are restant cases. Median amongst judges was 39,34% of restant cases from the total number of unresolved cases.
In this dimension the judge belongs to the group that is average.

Overall Evaluation
Evaluation on a scale from 0 to 10.

Indicators for 2017

We do not register any indicators for the judge yet.

Indicators for 2015

Number of Constitutional Court decisions against the judge:

  • Issued – 0
  • Delays prior to case assignment – 0

The judge was mostly assigned to Civil agenda. The judge mostly issued judgements in Civil agenda.

The judge worked 1081 days in the period and was assigned on average 36 cases per 100 days in main agendas.

Evaluation

In 2015, the judge received in total 27 from 40 possible points and ranked on 134 – 152. place of 738 evaluated judges.

  • Quality – 12 out of 15 points
  • Effectivity – 15 out of 25 points

Chart Comparison

Legend
Advanced Comparison
The chart is most useful for comparisons of judges at the same or similar courts, and those who decide cases in the same or similar agenda. Specific courts and agendas have an impact on the overall performance of judges. Simply put, commercial judge from Bratislava and criminal judge from Rožňava decide uncomparable cases.

Quality Indicators

The judge's judgements were on appeal affirmed in 82.3% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 67.1%.

  • Number of Appellate Decisions – 299
  • Number of Affirmed Decisions – 246

An appeal against the judge's judgements is filed in 15.5% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 9.3%.

Of the total number of the judge's judgements 2.8% is changed or reversed. The average in the same agenda is 3%.

Effectivity Indicators

Estimated average length of proceedings is 288 days. The average at the end of 2015 was 339 days.

The judge had 401 unresolved cases at the end of 2015. The average was 377 cases.

The judge had 192 restant cases at the end of 2015. The average was 150. This represents 47.9% of the judge's unresolved cases. Average was 42.6%.

In 2015, the judge was able to resolve 110.4% of assigned cases. Average was 97.1%.

Indicators for 2013

The number of Constitutional court judgements against the judges – issued 0 and delays prior to case assignment 0.

For the judge we register performance data for years 2011 – 2013:

Sudcovi bola prideľovaná najmä Občiansko–právna agenda. Sudca rozhodoval najmä v Občiansko–právnej agende.

The judge in this period worked 654 days and on average was assigned 200 cases in 10 days in main agendas.

Chart Comparison

Legend
Advanced Comparison
The chart is most useful for comparisons of judges at the same or similar courts, and those who decide cases in the same or similar agenda. Specific courts and agendas have an impact on the overall performance of judges. Simply put, commercial judge from Bratislava and criminal judge from Rožňava decide uncomparable cases.

Quality indicators

Rozhodnutie sudcu bolo v prípade odvolania potvrdené v 64,4% prípadoch, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 62,9%.

  • Number of appellate judgements – 90
  • Number of confirmed judgements – 58

Odvolanie proti rozhodnutiam sudcu je podávané v približne 8,7% prípadoch, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 8,9%.

Z celkového počtu rozhodnutí sudcu je zmenených alebo zrušených 3,1%, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 3,3%.

Efficiency indicators

Odhadovaná priemerná dĺžka konania sporu je 446 dní. Priemer bol na konci roka 346 dní.

Sudca mal na konci roka 2013 nevybavených 457 prípadov. Priemer bol 238.

Sudca mal na konci roka 197 reštančných vecí, pričom priemer je 126. To u sudcu tvorí 41,6% z nevybavených vecí. Priemer je 43,4.

Sudca dokázal v roku 2013 vybaviť, k počtu pridelených vecí, 91,2% prípadov. Priemer bol 99,6%.

Sudca získal podľa našej metodológie celkovo 16,25 bodov. Spomedzi 739 hodnotených sudcov sa umiestnil na 595 – 599. mieste. Za kvalitu získal 7,5 z 15 možných bodov, za efektivitu 8,75 z 25.

Published judgements

  1. Rozsudok – Rozvod
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  2. Rozsudok – Bezpodielové spoluvlastníctvo manželov
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  3. Uznesenie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  4. Uznesenie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  5. Uznesenie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  6. Uznesenie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  7. Rozsudok – Ostatné
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  8. Uznesenie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  9. Uznesenie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  10. Rozsudok – Spoluvlastníctvo
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

More judgements

Upcoming hearings

We do not register any upcoming hearings for the judge yet.

Past hearings

  1. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, o určenie vlastníckeho práva… Hearing was held on

  2. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, o zaplatenie 3555 Eur s… Hearing was held on

  3. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, zaplatenie 338,48 eur s… Hearing was held on

  4. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, o zaplatenie 3.064,74 eur s… Hearing was held on

  5. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, na zrušenie a vyporiadanie… Hearing was held on

  6. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, o určenie vlastníckeho práva… Hearing was held on

  7. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, o určenie vlastníckeho práva… Hearing was held on

  8. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, Návrh na rozvod manželstva Hearing was held on

  9. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, na zrušenie a vyporiadanie… Hearing was held on

  10. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, Žaloba o určenie neplatnosti… Hearing was held on

More hearings

Information regarding the court were obtained from the judge list, which was most recently updated on . The information may have been additionally supplemented by the data retrieved from property declarations and statistical reports.