JUDr. Eduard Valenčin

  1. Active judge at the court Krajský súd Prešov, we register 148 hearings and 11 judgements.
  2. Inactive judge at the court Okresný súd Prešov, we register 3,117 hearings and 2,866 judgements.

Indicators for 2021

We do not register any indicators for the judge yet.

Indicators for 2017

Number of Constitutional Court decisions against the judge:

  • Issued – 1
  • Delays prior to case assignment – 0

The judge was mostly assigned to Civil agenda. The judge mostly issued judgements in Civil agenda.

The judge worked 1489 days in the period and was assigned on average 16 cases per 100 days in main agendas.

Evaluation

In 2017, the judge received in total 26 from 40 possible points and ranked on 113 – 132. place of 651 evaluated judges.

  • Quality – 12 out of 15 points
  • Effectivity – 14 out of 25 points

Chart Comparison

Legend
Advanced Comparison
The chart is most useful for comparisons of judges at the same or similar courts, and those who decide cases in the same or similar agenda. Specific courts and agendas have an impact on the overall performance of judges. Simply put, commercial judge from Bratislava and criminal judge from Rožňava decide uncomparable cases.

Quality Indicators

The judge's judgements were on appeal affirmed in 80.3% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 68.7%.

  • Number of Appellate Decisions – 295
  • Number of Affirmed Decisions – 237

An appeal against the judge's judgements is filed in 12.2% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 10.1%.

Of the total number of the judge's judgements 2.4% is changed or reversed. The average in the same agenda is 3.1%.

Effectivity Indicators

Estimated average length of proceedings is 444.7 days. The average at the end of 2017 was 340.8 days.

The judge had 173 unresolved cases at the end of 2017. The average was 192.7 cases.

The judge had 129 restant cases at the end of 2017. The average was 111.7. This represents 74.6% of the judge's unresolved cases. Average was 54.1%.

In 2017, the judge was able to resolve 253.6% of assigned cases. Average was 141.8%.

Indicators for 2015

Number of Constitutional Court decisions against the judge:

  • Issued – 1
  • Delays prior to case assignment – 0

The judge was mostly assigned to Civil agenda. The judge mostly issued judgements in Civil agenda.

The judge worked 1066 days in the period and was assigned on average 20 cases per 100 days in main agendas.

Evaluation

In 2015, the judge received in total 24 from 40 possible points and ranked on 262 – 285. place of 738 evaluated judges.

  • Quality – 12 out of 15 points
  • Effectivity – 12 out of 25 points

Chart Comparison

Legend
Advanced Comparison
The chart is most useful for comparisons of judges at the same or similar courts, and those who decide cases in the same or similar agenda. Specific courts and agendas have an impact on the overall performance of judges. Simply put, commercial judge from Bratislava and criminal judge from Rožňava decide uncomparable cases.

Quality Indicators

The judge's judgements were on appeal affirmed in 79.6% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 67.1%.

  • Number of Appellate Decisions – 211
  • Number of Affirmed Decisions – 168

An appeal against the judge's judgements is filed in 11.4% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 9.3%.

Of the total number of the judge's judgements 2.3% is changed or reversed. The average in the same agenda is 3%.

Effectivity Indicators

Estimated average length of proceedings is 380 days. The average at the end of 2015 was 339 days.

The judge had 568 unresolved cases at the end of 2015. The average was 377 cases.

The judge had 217 restant cases at the end of 2015. The average was 150. This represents 38.2% of the judge's unresolved cases. Average was 42.6%.

In 2015, the judge was able to resolve 95.4% of assigned cases. Average was 97.1%.

Indicators for 2013

The number of Constitutional court judgements against the judges – issued 0 and delays prior to case assignment 0.

For the judge we register performance data for years 2011 – 2013:

Sudcovi bola prideľovaná najmä Občiansko–právna agenda. Sudca rozhodoval najmä v Občiansko–právnej agende.

The judge in this period worked 642 days and on average was assigned 169 cases in 10 days in main agendas.

Chart Comparison

Legend
Advanced Comparison
The chart is most useful for comparisons of judges at the same or similar courts, and those who decide cases in the same or similar agenda. Specific courts and agendas have an impact on the overall performance of judges. Simply put, commercial judge from Bratislava and criminal judge from Rožňava decide uncomparable cases.

Quality indicators

Rozhodnutie sudcu bolo v prípade odvolania potvrdené v 73,6% prípadoch, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 62,9%.

  • Number of appellate judgements – 91
  • Number of confirmed judgements – 67

Odvolanie proti rozhodnutiam sudcu je podávané v približne 9,3% prípadoch, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 8,9%.

Z celkového počtu rozhodnutí sudcu je zmenených alebo zrušených 2,4%, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 3,3%.

Efficiency indicators

Odhadovaná priemerná dĺžka konania sporu je 370 dní. Priemer bol na konci roka 346 dní.

Sudca mal na konci roka 2013 nevybavených 291 prípadov. Priemer bol 238.

Sudca mal na konci roka 105 reštančných vecí, pričom priemer je 126. To u sudcu tvorí 31,3% z nevybavených vecí. Priemer je 43,4.

Sudca dokázal v roku 2013 vybaviť, k počtu pridelených vecí, 87,2% prípadov. Priemer bol 99,6%.

Sudca získal podľa našej metodológie celkovo 23 bodov. Spomedzi 739 hodnotených sudcov sa umiestnil na 253 – 268. mieste. Za kvalitu získal 9,75 z 15 možných bodov, za efektivitu 13,25 z 25.

Notes

obtained from annual statistical reports of judges pertaining to indicators.

  • 2013 – 5
  • 2012 – 4
  • 2011 – 8; 2012 – 4; 2013 – 5
  • 2011 – 8

Published judgements

  1. Uznesenie
    Pripúštajúce spätvzatie návrhu, zrušujúce rozsudok a…
    Judgement was issued on

  2. Uznesenie
    Zastavujúce odvolacie konanie
    Judgement was issued on

  3. Rozsudok – Neplatnosť právnych úkonov
    Potvrdené
    Judgement was issued on

  4. Uznesenie
    Odmietajúce odvolanie
    Judgement was issued on

  5. Uznesenie – Zodpovednosť za škodu
    Potvrdené
    Judgement was issued on

  6. Rozsudok – Vlastnícke právo k nehnuteľnostiam
    Potvrdené
    Judgement was issued on

  7. Uznesenie – Exekúcia a výkon rozhodnutí
    Potvrdené
    Judgement was issued on

  8. Rozsudok – Neplatnosť právnych úkonov
    Potvrdené
    Judgement was issued on

  9. Uznesenie
    Potvrdené
    Judgement was issued on

  10. Rozsudok – Zmluvy
    Potvrdené
    Judgement was issued on

More judgements

Upcoming hearings

We do not register any upcoming hearings for the judge yet.

Past hearings

  1. Verejné vyhlásenie rozsudku, o vyporiadanie BSM po rozvode… Hearing was held on

  2. Verejné vyhlásenie rozsudku, určenie že vec patrí do… Hearing was held on

  3. Verejné vyhlásenie rozsudku, Žaloba na náhradu škody… Hearing was held on

  4. Verejné vyhlásenie rozsudku, zaplatenie 7.000,- € s prísl. Hearing was held on

  5. Verejné vyhlásenie rozsudku, o zaplatenie 312,3 Eur s… Hearing was held on

  6. Verejné vyhlásenie rozsudku, neplatnosť odstúpenia od… Hearing was held on

  7. Verejné vyhlásenie rozsudku, o zaplatenie 4776,74 Eur s… Hearing was held on

  8. Verejné vyhlásenie rozsudku, žaloba o neplatnosti… Hearing was held on

  9. Verejné vyhlásenie rozsudku, určenie vlastníckeho práva k… Hearing was held on

  10. Verejné vyhlásenie rozsudku, o zaplatenie 336,91 EUR s… Hearing was held on

More hearings

Information regarding the court were obtained from the judge list, which was most recently updated on . The information may have been additionally supplemented by the data retrieved from property declarations and statistical reports.