Close persons acknowledged in property declarations in years 2014, 2013, 2012, and 2011.
Close persons acknowledged in property declaration in a year 2014:
Close persons acknowledged in property declaration in a year 2013:
Close persons acknowledged in property declaration in a year 2012:
Close persons acknowledged in property declaration in a year 2011:
Notes about the data obtained from annual statistical reports of judges.
Overall evaluation of the judge is below average.
Incoming cases for the judge in 2021 were mostly from criminal agenda. Judge's decrees in 2021 were mostly from criminal agenda.
We register 69.50% decrees for the judge, which are confirmed by the higher court in case of an appeal. The median amongst judges is 68,9%.
We register 200 decrees concerning appeals.
In this dimension the judge belongs to the group that is average.
The judge had overal appointment of cases of 110.22% in 2021. The median amongst judges is 107,9%.
Anticipated time of the judge was based on data from 2021 127 days. Median amongst judges was 224,3 days.
In 2021 the judge decided 205 cases in the observed agendas.
In this dimension the judge belongs to the group that is average.
Weighted product of the judge in 2021 was 209.259. Median amongst judges was 248,1.
For the judge we register 74 unresolved cases at the end of 2021. From those 66.22% are restant cases. Median amongst judges was 39,34% of restant cases from the total number of unresolved cases.
In this dimension the judge belongs to the group that is worse than average.
Number of Constitutional Court decisions against the judge:
The judge was mostly assigned to Criminal agenda. The judge mostly issued judgements in translation missing: en.judges.indicators_2015.basic.decided_agenda.trestná.
The judge worked 1117 days in the period and was assigned on average 62 cases per 100 days in main agendas.
In 2017, the judge received in total 5.5 from 40 possible points and ranked on 646 – 647. place of 651 evaluated judges.
The judge's judgements were on appeal affirmed in 59.4% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 66%.
An appeal against the judge's judgements is filed in 2.9% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 8.7%.
Of the total number of the judge's judgements 1.2% is changed or reversed. The average in the same agenda is 2.9%.
Estimated average length of proceedings is 737.6 days. The average at the end of 2017 was 340.8 days.
The judge had 194 unresolved cases at the end of 2017. The average was 192.7 cases.
The judge had 143 restant cases at the end of 2017. The average was 111.7. This represents 73.7% of the judge's unresolved cases. Average was 54.1%.
In 2017, the judge was able to resolve 38.2% of assigned cases. Average was 141.8%.
Number of Constitutional Court decisions against the judge:
The judge was mostly assigned to Criminal agenda. The judge mostly issued judgements in Criminal agenda.
The judge worked 688 days in the period and was assigned on average 51 cases per 100 days in main agendas.
In 2015, the judge received in total 9 from 40 possible points and ranked on 716 – 721. place of 738 evaluated judges.
The judge's judgements were on appeal affirmed in 47.6% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 63.8%.
An appeal against the judge's judgements is filed in 2.6% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 8.1%.
Of the total number of the judge's judgements 1.4% is changed or reversed. The average in the same agenda is 3%.
Estimated average length of proceedings is 271 days. The average at the end of 2015 was 339 days.
The judge had 81 unresolved cases at the end of 2015. The average was 377 cases.
The judge had 45 restant cases at the end of 2015. The average was 150. This represents 55.6% of the judge's unresolved cases. Average was 42.6%.
In 2015, the judge was able to resolve 59.2% of assigned cases. Average was 97.1%.
The number of Constitutional court judgements against the judges – issued 0 and delays prior to case assignment 0.
For the judge we register performance data for years 2011 – 2013:
Sudcovi bola prideľovaná najmä Trestná agenda. Sudca rozhodoval najmä v Trestnej agende.
The judge in this period worked 470 days and on average was assigned 88 cases in 10 days in main agendas.
Rozhodnutie sudcu bolo v prípade odvolania potvrdené v 47,4% prípadoch, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 52,3%.
Odvolanie proti rozhodnutiam sudcu je podávané v približne 3,6% prípadoch, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 8,4%.
Z celkového počtu rozhodnutí sudcu je zmenených alebo zrušených 1,9%, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 4%.
Odhadovaná priemerná dĺžka konania sporu je 0 dní. Priemer bol na konci roka 346 dní.
Sudca mal na konci roka 2013 nevybavených 0 prípadov. Priemer bol 238.
Dáta o reštančných prípadoch považujeme za málo reprezentatívne a preto ich neprezentujeme.
Dáta o výkonnosti sudcu považujeme za málo reprezentatívne a preto ich neprezentujeme.
Dáta o kvalite a efektivite sudcu nepovažujeme za dostatočné, preto sudcu bodovo nehodnotíme.
Notes about the data obtained from annual statistical reports of judges pertaining to indicators.
We do not register any upcoming hearings for the judge yet.
Information regarding the court were obtained from the judge list, which was most recently updated on . The information may have been additionally supplemented by the data retrieved from property declarations and statistical reports.