JUDr. Zdenko Čaniga

  1. Active judge at the court Okresný súd Pezinok, we register 955 hearings and 44 judgements.
  2. Inactive judge at the court Okresný súd Bratislava III, we register 552 hearings and 518 judgements.

obtained from annual statistical reports of judges.

Indicators for 2017

Number of Constitutional Court decisions against the judge:

  • Issued – 1
  • Delays prior to case assignment – 0

The judge was mostly assigned to Criminal agenda. The judge mostly issued judgements in translation missing: en.judges.indicators_2015.basic.decided_agenda.trestná.

The judge worked 1530 days in the period and was assigned on average 130 cases per 100 days in main agendas.

Evaluation

In 2017, the judge received in total 15 from 40 possible points and ranked on 566 – 574. place of 651 evaluated judges.

  • Quality – 0 out of 15 points
  • Effectivity – 15 out of 25 points

Chart Comparison

Legend
Advanced Comparison
The chart is most useful for comparisons of judges at the same or similar courts, and those who decide cases in the same or similar agenda. Specific courts and agendas have an impact on the overall performance of judges. Simply put, commercial judge from Bratislava and criminal judge from Rožňava decide uncomparable cases.

Quality Indicators

The judge's judgements were on appeal affirmed in 46.8% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 66%.

  • Number of Appellate Decisions – 203
  • Number of Affirmed Decisions – 95

An appeal against the judge's judgements is filed in 8.7% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 8.7%.

Of the total number of the judge's judgements 4.6% is changed or reversed. The average in the same agenda is 2.9%.

Effectivity Indicators

Estimated average length of proceedings is 127.2 days. The average at the end of 2017 was 340.8 days.

The judge had 85 unresolved cases at the end of 2017. The average was 192.7 cases.

The judge had 22 restant cases at the end of 2017. The average was 111.7. This represents 25.9% of the judge's unresolved cases. Average was 54.1%.

In 2017, the judge was able to resolve 91% of assigned cases. Average was 141.8%.

Indicators for 2015

Number of Constitutional Court decisions against the judge:

  • Issued – 1
  • Delays prior to case assignment – 0

The judge was mostly assigned to Criminal agenda. The judge mostly issued judgements in Criminal agenda.

The judge worked 1087 days in the period and was assigned on average 110 cases per 100 days in main agendas.

Evaluation

In 2015, the judge received in total 22 from 40 possible points and ranked on 345 – 366. place of 738 evaluated judges.

  • Quality – 1.5 out of 15 points
  • Effectivity – 20.5 out of 25 points

Quality Indicators

The judge's judgements were on appeal affirmed in 48% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 63.8%.

  • Number of Appellate Decisions – 173
  • Number of Affirmed Decisions – 83

An appeal against the judge's judgements is filed in 9.3% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 8.1%.

Of the total number of the judge's judgements 4.8% is changed or reversed. The average in the same agenda is 3%.

Effectivity Indicators

Estimated average length of proceedings is 146 days. The average at the end of 2015 was 339 days.

The judge had 103 unresolved cases at the end of 2015. The average was 377 cases.

The judge had 34 restant cases at the end of 2015. The average was 150. This represents 33% of the judge's unresolved cases. Average was 42.6%.

In 2015, the judge was able to resolve 124.8% of assigned cases. Average was 97.1%.

Indicators for 2013

The number of Constitutional court judgements against the judges – issued 0 and delays prior to case assignment 0.

For the judge we register performance data for years 2011 – 2013:

Sudcovi bola prideľovaná najmä Trestná agenda. Sudca rozhodoval najmä v Trestnej agende.

The judge in this period worked 643 days and on average was assigned 91 cases in 10 days in main agendas.

Quality indicators

Rozhodnutie sudcu bolo v prípade odvolania potvrdené v 40,6% prípadoch, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 52,3%.

  • Number of appellate judgements – 96
  • Number of confirmed judgements – 39

Odvolanie proti rozhodnutiam sudcu je podávané v približne 12,7% prípadoch, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 8,4%.

Z celkového počtu rozhodnutí sudcu je zmenených alebo zrušených 7,6%, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 4%.

Efficiency indicators

Odhadovaná priemerná dĺžka konania sporu je 144 dní. Priemer bol na konci roka 346 dní.

Sudca mal na konci roka 2013 nevybavených 119 prípadov. Priemer bol 238.

Sudca mal na konci roka 46 reštančných vecí, pričom priemer je 126. To u sudcu tvorí 36,5% z nevybavených vecí. Priemer je 43,4.

Sudca dokázal v roku 2013 vybaviť, k počtu pridelených vecí, 115,3% prípadov. Priemer bol 99,6%.

Sudca získal podľa našej metodológie celkovo 21,75 bodov. Spomedzi 739 hodnotených sudcov sa umiestnil na 331 – 345. mieste. Za kvalitu získal 3,5 z 15 možných bodov, za efektivitu 18,25 z 25.

Published judgements

  1. Rozsudok – Majetok
    Zmenené
    Judgement was issued on

  2. Trestný rozkaz – Všeobecne nebezpečné a proti…
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  3. Trestný rozkaz – Všeobecne nebezpečné a proti…
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  4. Trestný rozkaz – Sloboda a ľudská dôstojnosť
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  5. Trestný rozkaz – Ostatné
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  6. Trestný rozkaz – Všeobecne nebezpečné a proti…
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  7. Trestný rozkaz – Rodina a mládež
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  8. Trestný rozkaz – Život a zdravie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  9. Trestný rozkaz – Ostatné
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  10. Rozsudok – Sloboda a ľudská dôstojnosť
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

More judgements

Upcoming hearings

We do not register any upcoming hearings for the judge yet.

Past hearings

  1. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, prečin: zanedbanie povinnej… Hearing was held on

    Court – Okresný súd Pezinok
    Judge – JUDr. Zdenko Čaniga
    Defendant – W. T.
  2. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, prečin zanedbania povinnej… Hearing was held on

    Court – Okresný súd Pezinok
    Judge – JUDr. Zdenko Čaniga
    Defendant – P. D.
  3. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, obžaloba Hearing was held on

    Court – Okresný súd Pezinok
    Judge – JUDr. Zdenko Čaniga
    Defendant – X. O.
  4. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, obžaloba Hearing was held on

    Court – Okresný súd Pezinok
    Judge – JUDr. Zdenko Čaniga
    Defendant – B. U.
  5. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, žiadosť o podmienečné upustenie… Hearing was held on

  6. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, pokračujúci prečin krádeže… Hearing was held on

    Court – Okresný súd Pezinok
    Judge – JUDr. Zdenko Čaniga
    Defendant – X. Y.
  7. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, návrh na schálenie dohody o… Hearing was held on

    Court – Okresný súd Pezinok
    Judge – JUDr. Zdenko Čaniga
    Defendant – Z. S.
  8. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, prečin: zanedbanie povinnej… Hearing was held on

    Court – Okresný súd Pezinok
    Judge – JUDr. Zdenko Čaniga
    Defendant – O. U.
  9. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, Rozhodovanie o obžalobách Hearing was held on

  10. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, zmena ochrannej liečby Hearing was held on

More hearings

Information regarding the court were obtained from the judge list, which was most recently updated on . The information may have been additionally supplemented by the data retrieved from property declarations and statistical reports.