JUDr. Marcela Dolníková Žabková

  1. Active judge at the court Okresný súd Žilina, we register 1,615 hearings and 733 judgements.
    Note: - vykonáva stáž sudcu na Európskom súde pre ľudské práva v Štrasburgu.
  1. The judge has been nominated to function for almost 17 years.

obtained from annual statistical reports of judges.

Indicators for 2021

Overall evaluation of the judge is below average.
Incoming cases for the judge in 2021 were mostly from civil agenda. Judge's decrees in 2021 were mostly from civil agenda.

Component – Quality

We register 58.18% decrees for the judge, which are confirmed by the higher court in case of an appeal. The median amongst judges is 68,9%. We register 110 decrees concerning appeals.
In this dimension the judge belongs to the group that is worse than average.

Component – Effectivity

The judge had overal appointment of cases of 121.21% in 2021. The median amongst judges is 107,9%.
Anticipated time of the judge was based on data from 2021 562 days. Median amongst judges was 224,3 days.
In 2021 the judge decided 240 cases in the observed agendas.
In this dimension the judge belongs to the group that is average.

Component – Productivity

Weighted product of the judge in 2021 was 236.544. Median amongst judges was 248,1.
For the judge we register 294 unresolved cases at the end of 2021. From those 49.66% are restant cases. Median amongst judges was 39,34% of restant cases from the total number of unresolved cases.
In this dimension the judge belongs to the group that is average.

Overall Evaluation
Evaluation on a scale from 0 to 10.

Indicators for 2017

We do not register any indicators for the judge yet.

Indicators for 2015

We do not register any indicators for the judge yet.

Indicators for 2013

The number of Constitutional court judgements against the judges – issued 0 and delays prior to case assignment 0.

For the judge we register performance data for years 2011 – 2013:

Sudcovi bola prideľovaná najmä Obchodná agenda. Sudca rozhodoval najmä v Obchodnej agende.

The judge in this period worked 245 days and on average was assigned 309 cases in 10 days in main agendas.

Chart Comparison

Legend
Additional Judges
Select other judges for comparison:
No judges found.
Advanced Comparison

Judgement agenda
No agendas available.

Similar court
No courts found.
The chart is most useful for comparisons of judges at the same or similar courts, and those who decide cases in the same or similar agenda. Specific courts and agendas have an impact on the overall performance of judges. Simply put, commercial judge from Bratislava and criminal judge from Rožňava decide uncomparable cases.

Quality indicators

Rozhodnutie sudcu bolo v prípade odvolania potvrdené v 60,9% prípadoch, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 63,7%.

  • Number of appellate judgements – 46
  • Number of confirmed judgements – 28

Odvolanie proti rozhodnutiam sudcu je podávané v približne 20,4% prípadoch, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 9,7%.

Z celkového počtu rozhodnutí sudcu je zmenených alebo zrušených 8%, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 3,4%.

Efficiency indicators

Odhadovaná priemerná dĺžka konania sporu je 2019 dní. Priemer bol na konci roka 346 dní.

Sudca mal na konci roka 2013 nevybavených 354 prípadov. Priemer bol 238.

Sudca mal na konci roka 202 reštančných vecí, pričom priemer je 126. To u sudcu tvorí 49,4% z nevybavených vecí. Priemer je 43,4.

Sudca dokázal v roku 2013 vybaviť, k počtu pridelených vecí, 64% prípadov. Priemer bol 99,6%.

Sudca získal podľa našej metodológie celkovo 8,25 bodov. Spomedzi 739 hodnotených sudcov sa umiestnil na 725. mieste. Za kvalitu získal 4 z 15 možných bodov, za efektivitu 4,25 z 25.

Notes

obtained from annual statistical reports of judges pertaining to indicators.

  • 2013 – žiadne
  • 2013 – sudkyňa pracovala do 29.04.2013, potom PN a následne odo dňa 14.05.2013 MD
  • 2012 – nemá znížený nápad ; 2013 – sudkyňa pracovala do 29.04.2013, potom PN a následne odo dňa 14.05.2013 MD
  • 2012 – nemá znížený nápad
  • 2012 – 2 dni školenie 23.–24.04.2012 "Konkurzné právo, cezhraničný konkurz, reštrukturalizácia" ; 2013 – žiadne
  • 2012 – 2 dni školenie 23.–24.04.2012 "Konkurzné právo, cezhraničný konkurz, reštrukturalizácia"

Published judgements

  1. Rozhodnutie – Zmluvy
    Zmeňujúce
    Judgement was issued on

  2. Dopĺňací rozsudok – Poistenie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  3. Uznesenie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  4. Uznesenie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  5. Rozsudok – Ostatné
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  6. Opravné uznesenie Judgement was issued on

  7. Opravné uznesenie – Ostatné
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  8. Rozsudok – Spotrebiteľské zmluvy
    Potvrdené
    Judgement was issued on

  9. Uznesenie – Ostatné
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  10. Rozsudok Judgement was issued on

More judgements

Upcoming hearings

We do not register any upcoming hearings for the judge yet.

Past hearings

  1. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, zrušenie vyživovacej… Hearing was held on

  2. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, Źaloba o určenie, že… Hearing was held on

  3. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, Určenie vyživovacej povinnosti Hearing was held on

  4. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, rozvod manželstva Hearing was held on

  5. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, náhradu škody Hearing was held on

  6. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, o zaplatenie 1595,94 EUR s… Hearing was held on

  7. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, určenie vlastníctva, že… Hearing was held on

  8. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, Určenie vyživovacej… Hearing was held on

  9. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, Źaloba o určenie, že… Hearing was held on

  10. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, o zaplatenie 9.621,08 eur s… Hearing was held on

More hearings

Information regarding the court were obtained from the judge list, which was most recently updated on . The information may have been additionally supplemented by the data retrieved from property declarations and statistical reports.