JUDr. Judita Dubjelová

  1. Inactive judge at the court Okresný súd Stará Ľubovňa, we register 1,009 hearings and 1,174 judgements.

Close persons acknowledged in property declarations in years 2014, 2013, 2012, and 2011.

Close persons acknowledged in property declaration in a year 2014:

Close persons acknowledged in property declaration in a year 2013:

Close persons acknowledged in property declaration in a year 2012:

Close persons acknowledged in property declaration in a year 2011:

obtained from annual statistical reports of judges.

Indicators for 2021

We do not register any indicators for the judge yet.

Indicators for 2017

We do not register any indicators for the judge yet.

Indicators for 2015

Number of Constitutional Court decisions against the judge:

  • Issued – 0
  • Delays prior to case assignment – 0

The judge was mostly assigned to Civil agenda. The judge mostly issued judgements in Civil agenda.

The judge worked 468 days in the period and was assigned on average 26 cases per 100 days in main agendas.

Evaluation

In 2015, the judge received in total 17.5 from 40 possible points and ranked on 542 – 556. place of 738 evaluated judges.

  • Quality – 7.5 out of 15 points
  • Effectivity – 10 out of 25 points

Chart Comparison

Legend
Advanced Comparison

Judge position

Judgement agenda

Similar court
The chart is most useful for comparisons of judges at the same or similar courts, and those who decide cases in the same or similar agenda. Specific courts and agendas have an impact on the overall performance of judges. Simply put, commercial judge from Bratislava and criminal judge from Rožňava decide uncomparable cases.

Quality Indicators

The judge's judgements were on appeal affirmed in 65.5% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 67.1%.

  • Number of Appellate Decisions – 84
  • Number of Affirmed Decisions – 55

An appeal against the judge's judgements is filed in 10.1% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 9.3%.

Of the total number of the judge's judgements 3.5% is changed or reversed. The average in the same agenda is 3%.

Effectivity Indicators

Estimated average length of proceedings is 723 days. The average at the end of 2015 was 339 days.

The judge had 422 unresolved cases at the end of 2015. The average was 377 cases.

The judge had 311 restant cases at the end of 2015. The average was 150. This represents 73.7% of the judge's unresolved cases. Average was 42.6%.

In 2015, the judge was able to resolve 127.5% of assigned cases. Average was 97.1%.

Indicators for 2013

The number of Constitutional court judgements against the judges – issued 0 and delays prior to case assignment 0.

For the judge we register performance data for years 2011:

Sudcovi bola prideľovaná najmä Občiansko–právna agenda. Sudca rozhodoval najmä v Občiansko–právnej agende.

The judge in this period worked 191 days and on average was assigned 139 cases in 10 days in main agendas.

Chart Comparison

Legend
Advanced Comparison

Judge position

Judgement agenda

Similar court
The chart is most useful for comparisons of judges at the same or similar courts, and those who decide cases in the same or similar agenda. Specific courts and agendas have an impact on the overall performance of judges. Simply put, commercial judge from Bratislava and criminal judge from Rožňava decide uncomparable cases.

Quality indicators

Rozhodnutie sudcu bolo v prípade odvolania potvrdené v 73,3% prípadoch, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 62,9%.

  • Number of appellate judgements – 15
  • Number of confirmed judgements – 11

Odvolanie proti rozhodnutiam sudcu je podávané v približne 4,5% prípadoch, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 8,9%.

Z celkového počtu rozhodnutí sudcu je zmenených alebo zrušených 1,2%, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 3,3%.

Efficiency indicators

Pre sudcu evidujeme menej ako 20 rozhodnutí, preto jeho efektivitu nehodnotíme.

Notes

obtained from annual statistical reports of judges pertaining to indicators.

  • 2011 – 3
  • 2011 – 3
  • 2011 – 0
  • 2011 – 0

Published judgements

  1. Uznesenie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  2. Uznesenie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  3. Rozsudok pre uznanie – Zmluvy
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  4. Rozsudok – Spotrebiteľské zmluvy
    Potvrdené
    Judgement was issued on

  5. Rozsudok – Ostatné
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  6. Rozsudok – Zmluvy
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  7. Rozsudok – Zmluvy
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  8. Rozsudok – Nájomná zmluva
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  9. Uznesenie – Exekúcia a výkon rozhodnutí
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  10. Uznesenie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

More judgements

Upcoming hearings

We do not register any upcoming hearings for the judge yet.

Past hearings

  1. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, Zaplatenie 2300,00 Eur s prísl. Hearing was held on

  2. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, Určenie práva zodpov. vecnému… Hearing was held on

  3. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, O určenie vlastníckeho práva Hearing was held on

  4. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, Zaplatenie 11008,00 Eur s… Hearing was held on

  5. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, Zaplatenie 1417,67 Eur s prísl. Hearing was held on

  6. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, o určenie vlastníctva (vylúč. z… Hearing was held on

  7. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, spísanie zápisnice o predbežnom… Hearing was held on

  8. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, O vydanie hnuteľných vecí Hearing was held on

  9. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, O vydanie hnuteľných vecí Hearing was held on

  10. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, O vydanie hnuteľných vecí Hearing was held on

More hearings

Information regarding the court were obtained from the judge list, which was most recently updated on . The information may have been additionally supplemented by the data retrieved from property declarations and statistical reports.