Close persons acknowledged in property declarations in years 2014 and 2013.
Close persons acknowledged in property declaration in a year 2014:
Close persons acknowledged in property declaration in a year 2013:
We do not register any indicators for the judge yet.
We do not register any indicators for the judge yet.
Number of Constitutional Court decisions against the judge:
The judge was mostly assigned to Civil agenda. The judge mostly issued judgements in Civil agenda.
The judge worked 449 days in the period and was assigned on average 10 cases per 100 days in main agendas.
In 2015, the judge received in total 21.5 from 40 possible points and ranked on 367 – 389. place of 738 evaluated judges.
The judge's judgements were on appeal affirmed in 81.8% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 67.1%.
An appeal against the judge's judgements is filed in 16.8% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 9.3%.
Of the total number of the judge's judgements 3.1% is changed or reversed. The average in the same agenda is 3%.
Estimated average length of proceedings is 550 days. The average at the end of 2015 was 339 days.
The judge had 425 unresolved cases at the end of 2015. The average was 377 cases.
The judge had 244 restant cases at the end of 2015. The average was 150. This represents 57.4% of the judge's unresolved cases. Average was 42.6%.
In 2015, the judge was able to resolve 107.6% of assigned cases. Average was 97.1%.
The number of Constitutional court judgements against the judges – issued 0 and delays prior to case assignment 0.
For the judge we register performance data for years 2013:
Sudcovi bola prideľovaná najmä Občiansko–právna agenda. Sudca rozhodoval najmä v Občiansko–právnej agende.
The judge in this period worked 42 days and on average was assigned 102 cases in 10 days in main agendas.
Evidujeme menej ako 10 odvolaní o rozhodnutiach sudcu, preto dáta považujeme za nereprezentatívne.
Odhadovaná priemerná dĺžka konania sporu je 5767 dní. Priemer bol na konci roka 346 dní.
Informácie o nevybavených prípadoch považujeme za málo reprezentatívne a preto ich neprezentujeme.
Dáta o reštančných prípadoch považujeme za málo reprezentatívne a preto ich neprezentujeme.
Dáta o výkonnosti sudcu považujeme za málo reprezentatívne a preto ich neprezentujeme.
Dáta o kvalite a efektivite sudcu nepovažujeme za dostatočné, preto sudcu bodovo nehodnotíme.
Notes about the data obtained from annual statistical reports of judges pertaining to indicators.
We do not register any upcoming hearings for the judge yet.
Information regarding the court were obtained from the judge list, which was most recently updated on . The information may have been additionally supplemented by the data retrieved from property declarations and statistical reports.