Overall evaluation of the judge is excellent.
Incoming cases for the judge in 2021 were mostly from criminal agenda. Judge's decrees in 2021 were mostly from criminal agenda.
We register 76.77% decrees for the judge, which are confirmed by the higher court in case of an appeal. The median amongst judges is 68,9%.
We register 310 decrees concerning appeals.
In this dimension the judge belongs to the group that is better than average.
The judge had overal appointment of cases of 117.62% in 2021. The median amongst judges is 107,9%.
Anticipated time of the judge was based on data from 2021 88 days. Median amongst judges was 224,3 days.
In 2021 the judge decided 227 cases in the observed agendas.
In this dimension the judge belongs to the group that is better than average.
Weighted product of the judge in 2021 was 228.333. Median amongst judges was 248,1.
For the judge we register 51 unresolved cases at the end of 2021. From those 66.67% are restant cases. Median amongst judges was 39,34% of restant cases from the total number of unresolved cases.
In this dimension the judge belongs to the group that is average.
Number of Constitutional Court decisions against the judge:
The judge was mostly assigned to Criminal agenda. The judge mostly issued judgements in translation missing: en.judges.indicators_2015.basic.decided_agenda.trestná.
The judge worked 931 days in the period and was assigned on average 76 cases per 100 days in main agendas.
In 2017, the judge received in total 29 from 40 possible points and ranked on 41 – 48. place of 651 evaluated judges.
The judge's judgements were on appeal affirmed in 84.6% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 66%.
An appeal against the judge's judgements is filed in 8.9% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 8.7%.
Of the total number of the judge's judgements 1.4% is changed or reversed. The average in the same agenda is 2.9%.
Estimated average length of proceedings is 97.9 days. The average at the end of 2017 was 340.8 days.
The judge had 99 unresolved cases at the end of 2017. The average was 192.7 cases.
The judge had 38 restant cases at the end of 2017. The average was 111.7. This represents 38.4% of the judge's unresolved cases. Average was 54.1%.
In 2017, the judge was able to resolve 106% of assigned cases. Average was 141.8%.
Number of Constitutional Court decisions against the judge:
The judge was mostly assigned to Criminal agenda. The judge mostly issued judgements in Criminal agenda.
The judge worked 496 days in the period and was assigned on average 44 cases per 100 days in main agendas.
In 2015, the judge received in total 31.5 from 40 possible points and ranked on 31 – 40. place of 738 evaluated judges.
The judge's judgements were on appeal affirmed in 82.7% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 63.8%.
An appeal against the judge's judgements is filed in 7.1% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 8.1%.
Of the total number of the judge's judgements 1.2% is changed or reversed. The average in the same agenda is 3%.
Estimated average length of proceedings is 76 days. The average at the end of 2015 was 339 days.
The judge had 71 unresolved cases at the end of 2015. The average was 377 cases.
The judge had 21 restant cases at the end of 2015. The average was 150. This represents 29.6% of the judge's unresolved cases. Average was 42.6%.
In 2015, the judge was able to resolve 106.2% of assigned cases. Average was 97.1%.
The number of Constitutional court judgements against the judges – issued 0 and delays prior to case assignment 0.
For the judge we register performance data for years 2013:
Sudcovi bola prideľovaná najmä Trestná agenda. Sudca rozhodoval najmä v Trestnej agende.
The judge in this period worked 39 days and on average was assigned 179 cases in 10 days in main agendas.
Evidujeme menej ako 10 odvolaní o rozhodnutiach sudcu, preto dáta považujeme za nereprezentatívne.
Odhadovaná priemerná dĺžka konania sporu je 327 dní. Priemer bol na konci roka 346 dní.
Informácie o nevybavených prípadoch považujeme za málo reprezentatívne a preto ich neprezentujeme.
Dáta o reštančných prípadoch považujeme za málo reprezentatívne a preto ich neprezentujeme.
Dáta o výkonnosti sudcu považujeme za málo reprezentatívne a preto ich neprezentujeme.
Dáta o kvalite a efektivite sudcu nepovažujeme za dostatočné, preto sudcu bodovo nehodnotíme.
We do not register any upcoming hearings for the judge yet.
Information regarding the court were obtained from the judge list, which was most recently updated on . The information may have been additionally supplemented by the data retrieved from property declarations and statistical reports.