JUDr. Peter Koman

  1. Active judge at the court Okresný súd Poprad, we register 4,392 hearings and 2,432 judgements.
  1. The judge has been nominated to function for almost 13 years.

Close persons acknowledged in property declarations in years 2013, 2012, and 2011.

Close persons acknowledged in property declaration in a year 2013:

Close persons acknowledged in property declaration in a year 2012:

Close persons acknowledged in property declaration in a year 2011:

Indicators for 2017

Number of Constitutional Court decisions against the judge:

  • Issued – 0
  • Delays prior to case assignment – 0

The judge was mostly assigned to Civil agenda. The judge mostly issued judgements in Civil agenda.

The judge worked 1518 days in the period and was assigned on average 29 cases per 100 days in main agendas.

Evaluation

In 2017, the judge received in total 13 from 40 possible points and ranked on 603 – 606. place of 651 evaluated judges.

  • Quality – 0 out of 15 points
  • Effectivity – 13 out of 25 points

Chart Comparison

Legend
Advanced Comparison
The chart is most useful for comparisons of judges at the same or similar courts, and those who decide cases in the same or similar agenda. Specific courts and agendas have an impact on the overall performance of judges. Simply put, commercial judge from Bratislava and criminal judge from Rožňava decide uncomparable cases.

Quality Indicators

The judge's judgements were on appeal affirmed in 40.4% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 68.7%.

  • Number of Appellate Decisions – 460
  • Number of Affirmed Decisions – 186

An appeal against the judge's judgements is filed in 19.5% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 10.1%.

Of the total number of the judge's judgements 11.6% is changed or reversed. The average in the same agenda is 3.1%.

Effectivity Indicators

Estimated average length of proceedings is 522.2 days. The average at the end of 2017 was 340.8 days.

The judge had 186 unresolved cases at the end of 2017. The average was 192.7 cases.

The judge had 88 restant cases at the end of 2017. The average was 111.7. This represents 47.3% of the judge's unresolved cases. Average was 54.1%.

In 2017, the judge was able to resolve 191.2% of assigned cases. Average was 141.8%.

Indicators for 2015

Number of Constitutional Court decisions against the judge:

  • Issued – 0
  • Delays prior to case assignment – 0

The judge was mostly assigned to Civil agenda. The judge mostly issued judgements in Civil agenda.

The judge worked 1089 days in the period and was assigned on average 30 cases per 100 days in main agendas.

Evaluation

In 2015, the judge received in total 11.5 from 40 possible points and ranked on 692 – 698. place of 738 evaluated judges.

  • Quality – 0 out of 15 points
  • Effectivity – 11.5 out of 25 points

Quality Indicators

The judge's judgements were on appeal affirmed in 41.8% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 67.1%.

  • Number of Appellate Decisions – 318
  • Number of Affirmed Decisions – 133

An appeal against the judge's judgements is filed in 17.6% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 9.3%.

Of the total number of the judge's judgements 10.2% is changed or reversed. The average in the same agenda is 3%.

Effectivity Indicators

Estimated average length of proceedings is 352 days. The average at the end of 2015 was 339 days.

The judge had 470 unresolved cases at the end of 2015. The average was 377 cases.

The judge had 197 restant cases at the end of 2015. The average was 150. This represents 41.9% of the judge's unresolved cases. Average was 42.6%.

In 2015, the judge was able to resolve 87.6% of assigned cases. Average was 97.1%.

Indicators for 2013

The number of Constitutional court judgements against the judges – issued 0 and delays prior to case assignment 0.

For the judge we register performance data for years 2011:

Sudcovi bola prideľovaná najmä Občiansko–právna agenda. Sudca rozhodoval najmä v Občiansko–právnej agende.

The judge in this period worked 214 days and on average was assigned 106 cases in 10 days in main agendas.

Quality indicators

Rozhodnutie sudcu bolo v prípade odvolania potvrdené v 45,5% prípadoch, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 62,9%.

  • Number of appellate judgements – 55
  • Number of confirmed judgements – 25

Odvolanie proti rozhodnutiam sudcu je podávané v približne 23,4% prípadoch, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 8,9%.

Z celkového počtu rozhodnutí sudcu je zmenených alebo zrušených 12,8%, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 3,3%.

Efficiency indicators

Pre sudcu evidujeme menej ako 20 rozhodnutí, preto jeho efektivitu nehodnotíme.

Published judgements

  1. Uznesenie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  2. Uznesenie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  3. Uznesenie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  4. Rozsudok – Spotrebiteľské zmluvy
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  5. Uznesenie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  6. Uznesenie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  7. Rozsudok – Bezpodielové spoluvlastníctvo manželov
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  8. Rozsudok pre uznanie – Pracovné právo
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  9. Rozsudok – Spotrebiteľské zmluvy
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  10. Rozsudok – Spotrebiteľské zmluvy
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

More judgements

Upcoming hearings

  1. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, o zaplatenie 5.715,38 € s… Hearing will be held on

  2. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, o vyplatenie cestovných náhrad… Hearing will be held on

  3. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, rozkaz na plnenie o vypratanie… Hearing will be held on

More hearings

Past hearings

  1. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, o náhradu škody 10.873,42 € s… Hearing was held on

  2. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, o vyplatenie cestovných… Hearing was held on

  3. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, o zaplatenie 5.715,38 € s… Hearing was held on

  4. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, o neplatnosť okamžitého… Hearing was held on

  5. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, o vyporiadanie BSM Hearing was held on

  6. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, o určenie neúčinnosti právneho… Hearing was held on

  7. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, o vydanie neodkladného… Hearing was held on

  8. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, vyporiadanie BSM po rozvode… Hearing was held on

  9. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, o zaplatenie 2.000,- € s… Hearing was held on

  10. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, o určenie neplatnosti… Hearing was held on

More hearings

Information regarding the court were obtained from the judge list, which was most recently updated on . The information may have been additionally supplemented by the data retrieved from property declarations and statistical reports.