Close persons acknowledged in property declarations in years 2014 and 2013.
Close persons acknowledged in property declaration in a year 2014:
Close persons acknowledged in property declaration in a year 2013:
Overall evaluation of the judge is above average.
Incoming cases for the judge in 2021 were mostly from criminal agenda. Judge's decrees in 2021 were mostly from criminal agenda.
We register 68.50% decrees for the judge, which are confirmed by the higher court in case of an appeal. The median amongst judges is 68,9%.
We register 127 decrees concerning appeals.
In this dimension the judge belongs to the group that is average.
The judge had overal appointment of cases of 145.91% in 2021. The median amongst judges is 107,9%.
Anticipated time of the judge was based on data from 2021 180 days. Median amongst judges was 224,3 days.
In 2021 the judge decided 232 cases in the observed agendas.
In this dimension the judge belongs to the group that is better than average.
Weighted product of the judge in 2021 was 266.424. Median amongst judges was 248,1.
For the judge we register 104 unresolved cases at the end of 2021. From those 59.62% are restant cases. Median amongst judges was 39,34% of restant cases from the total number of unresolved cases.
In this dimension the judge belongs to the group that is average.
Number of Constitutional Court decisions against the judge:
The judge was not assigned to any agenda dominantly. The judge mostly issued judgements in translation missing: en.judges.indicators_2015.basic.decided_agenda.trestná.
The judge worked 792 days in the period and was assigned on average 79 cases per 100 days in main agendas.
In 2017, the judge received in total 25.5 from 40 possible points and ranked on 133 – 155. place of 651 evaluated judges.
The judge's judgements were on appeal affirmed in 70.4% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 66%.
An appeal against the judge's judgements is filed in 5.3% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 8.7%.
Of the total number of the judge's judgements 1.6% is changed or reversed. The average in the same agenda is 2.9%.
Estimated average length of proceedings is 111.4 days. The average at the end of 2017 was 340.8 days.
The judge had 72 unresolved cases at the end of 2017. The average was 192.7 cases.
The judge had 17 restant cases at the end of 2017. The average was 111.7. This represents 23.6% of the judge's unresolved cases. Average was 54.1%.
In 2017, the judge was able to resolve 99.6% of assigned cases. Average was 141.8%.
Number of Constitutional Court decisions against the judge:
The judge was mostly assigned to Family Agenda. The judge mostly issued judgements in Family Agenda.
The judge worked 354 days in the period and was assigned on average 53 cases per 100 days in main agendas.
In 2015, the judge received in total 28 from 40 possible points and ranked on 107 – 118. place of 738 evaluated judges.
The judge's judgements were on appeal affirmed in 81.8% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 67.3%.
An appeal against the judge's judgements is filed in 4.6% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 7.6%.
Of the total number of the judge's judgements 0.8% is changed or reversed. The average in the same agenda is 2.5%.
Estimated average length of proceedings is 205 days. The average at the end of 2015 was 339 days.
The judge had 237 unresolved cases at the end of 2015. The average was 377 cases.
The judge had 109 restant cases at the end of 2015. The average was 150. This represents 46% of the judge's unresolved cases. Average was 42.6%.
In 2015, the judge was able to resolve 111.3% of assigned cases. Average was 97.1%.
We do not register any indicators for the judge yet.
We do not register any upcoming hearings for the judge yet.
Information regarding the court were obtained from the judge list, which was most recently updated on . The information may have been additionally supplemented by the data retrieved from property declarations and statistical reports.