Mgr. Eva Jombíková

  1. Active judge at the court Okresný súd Zvolen, we register 2,697 hearings and 3,358 judgements.
    Note: .

Indicators for 2021

We do not register any indicators for the judge yet.

Indicators for 2017

Number of Constitutional Court decisions against the judge:

  • Issued – 0
  • Delays prior to case assignment – 0

The judge was mostly assigned to Family Agenda. The judge mostly issued judgements in Family Agenda.

The judge worked 1481 days in the period and was assigned on average 153 cases per 100 days in main agendas.

Evaluation

In 2017, the judge received in total 24.5 from 40 possible points and ranked on 179 – 200. place of 651 evaluated judges.

  • Quality – 9 out of 15 points
  • Effectivity – 15.5 out of 25 points

Chart Comparison

Legend
Advanced Comparison
The chart is most useful for comparisons of judges at the same or similar courts, and those who decide cases in the same or similar agenda. Specific courts and agendas have an impact on the overall performance of judges. Simply put, commercial judge from Bratislava and criminal judge from Rožňava decide uncomparable cases.

Quality Indicators

The judge's judgements were on appeal affirmed in 70.8% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 67.8%.

  • Number of Appellate Decisions – 185
  • Number of Affirmed Decisions – 131

An appeal against the judge's judgements is filed in 5.6% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 7.9%.

Of the total number of the judge's judgements 1.6% is changed or reversed. The average in the same agenda is 2.5%.

Effectivity Indicators

Estimated average length of proceedings is 189.9 days. The average at the end of 2017 was 340.8 days.

The judge had 244 unresolved cases at the end of 2017. The average was 192.7 cases.

The judge had 82 restant cases at the end of 2017. The average was 111.7. This represents 33.6% of the judge's unresolved cases. Average was 54.1%.

In 2017, the judge was able to resolve 113% of assigned cases. Average was 141.8%.

Indicators for 2015

Number of Constitutional Court decisions against the judge:

  • Issued – 0
  • Delays prior to case assignment – 0

The judge was mostly assigned to Family Agenda. The judge mostly issued judgements in Family Agenda.

The judge worked 1050 days in the period and was assigned on average 113 cases per 100 days in main agendas.

Evaluation

In 2015, the judge received in total 26 from 40 possible points and ranked on 168 – 193. place of 738 evaluated judges.

  • Quality – 10.5 out of 15 points
  • Effectivity – 15.5 out of 25 points

Chart Comparison

Legend
Advanced Comparison
The chart is most useful for comparisons of judges at the same or similar courts, and those who decide cases in the same or similar agenda. Specific courts and agendas have an impact on the overall performance of judges. Simply put, commercial judge from Bratislava and criminal judge from Rožňava decide uncomparable cases.

Quality Indicators

The judge's judgements were on appeal affirmed in 74.5% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 67.3%.

  • Number of Appellate Decisions – 137
  • Number of Affirmed Decisions – 102

An appeal against the judge's judgements is filed in 5.8% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 7.6%.

Of the total number of the judge's judgements 1.5% is changed or reversed. The average in the same agenda is 2.5%.

Effectivity Indicators

Estimated average length of proceedings is 233 days. The average at the end of 2015 was 339 days.

The judge had 270 unresolved cases at the end of 2015. The average was 377 cases.

The judge had 76 restant cases at the end of 2015. The average was 150. This represents 28.1% of the judge's unresolved cases. Average was 42.6%.

In 2015, the judge was able to resolve 94.8% of assigned cases. Average was 97.1%.

Indicators for 2013

The number of Constitutional court judgements against the judges – issued 0 and delays prior to case assignment 0.

For the judge we register performance data for years 2011 – 2013:

Sudcovi bola prideľovaná najmä agenda Starostlivosti o maloletých. Sudca rozhodoval najmä v agende Starostlivosti o maloletých.

The judge in this period worked 643 days and on average was assigned 238 cases in 10 days in main agendas.

Chart Comparison

Legend
Advanced Comparison
The chart is most useful for comparisons of judges at the same or similar courts, and those who decide cases in the same or similar agenda. Specific courts and agendas have an impact on the overall performance of judges. Simply put, commercial judge from Bratislava and criminal judge from Rožňava decide uncomparable cases.

Quality indicators

Rozhodnutie sudcu bolo v prípade odvolania potvrdené v 77% prípadoch, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 65,5%.

  • Number of appellate judgements – 74
  • Number of confirmed judgements – 57

Odvolanie proti rozhodnutiam sudcu je podávané v približne 4,8% prípadoch, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 7,2%.

Z celkového počtu rozhodnutí sudcu je zmenených alebo zrušených 1,1%, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 2,5%.

Efficiency indicators

Odhadovaná priemerná dĺžka konania sporu je 146 dní. Priemer bol na konci roka 346 dní.

Sudca mal na konci roka 2013 nevybavených 207 prípadov. Priemer bol 238.

Sudca mal na konci roka 44 reštančných vecí, pričom priemer je 126. To u sudcu tvorí 18,9% z nevybavených vecí. Priemer je 43,4.

Sudca dokázal v roku 2013 vybaviť, k počtu pridelených vecí, 92,7% prípadov. Priemer bol 99,6%.

Sudca získal podľa našej metodológie celkovo 29 bodov. Spomedzi 739 hodnotených sudcov sa umiestnil na 46 – 51. mieste. Za kvalitu získal 11 z 15 možných bodov, za efektivitu 18 z 25.

Notes

obtained from annual statistical reports of judges pertaining to indicators.

  • 2013 – 24. 10. 2013 Pracovné stretnutie sudcov vybavujúcich agendu P, Omšenie;
  • 2012 – 16. – 17. 02. 2012 – 5. pracovné stretnutie sudcov vybavujúcich agendu P–výkon rozhodnutia, novela OSP, 26. 04. 2012 – pracovné stretnutie sudcov obvodu Krajského súdu v Banskej Bystrici, 21. 05. 2012 – pracovné stretnutie sudcov OS Zvolen, 25. 10. 2012 – 6. pracovné stretnutie sudcov vybavujúcich agendu P
  • 2011 – Aktuálne otázky rodinného práva – Justičná akadémia – 1 deň; 2012 – 16. – 17. 02. 2012 – 5. pracovné stretnutie sudcov vybavujúcich agendu P–výkon rozhodnutia, novela OSP, 26. 04. 2012 – pracovné stretnutie sudcov obvodu Krajského súdu v Banskej Bystrici, 21. 05. 2012 – pracovné stretnutie sudcov OS Zvolen, 25. 10. 2012 – 6. pracovné stretnutie sudcov vybavujúcich agendu P; 2013 – 24. 10. 2013 Pracovné stretnutie sudcov vybavujúcich agendu P, Omšenie;
  • 2011 – Aktuálne otázky rodinného práva – Justičná akadémia – 1 deň

Published judgements

  1. Rozsudok – Ostatné
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  2. Uznesenie – Spätvzatie
    Pripúštajúce spätvzatie návrhu, zrušujúce rozsudok a…
    Judgement was issued on

  3. Uznesenie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  4. Rozsudok – Vyživovacie povinnosti
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  5. Uznesenie – Osvojenie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  6. Uznesenie – Starostlivosť o maloletých
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  7. Rozsudok – Rozvod
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  8. Uznesenie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  9. Rozsudok – Rozvod
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  10. Rozsudok – Vyživovacie povinnosti
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

More judgements

Upcoming hearings

We do not register any upcoming hearings for the judge yet.

Past hearings

  1. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, zvýšenie výživného na… Hearing was held on

  2. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, zmena úpravy styku Hearing was held on

  3. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, rozvod manželstva a úprava… Hearing was held on

  4. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, návrh na zmenu úpravy styku s… Hearing was held on

  5. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, rozvod manželstva Hearing was held on

  6. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, rozvod manželstva Hearing was held on

  7. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, náhradná osobná starostlivosť Hearing was held on

  8. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, návrh na úpravu výkonu… Hearing was held on

  9. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, návrh na úpravu výkonu… Hearing was held on

  10. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, rozvod manželstva Hearing was held on

More hearings

Information regarding the court were obtained from the judge list, which was most recently updated on . The information may have been additionally supplemented by the data retrieved from property declarations and statistical reports.