Mgr. Dalibor Miľan

  1. Active judge at the court Okresný súd Zvolen, we register 2,309 hearings and 3,135 judgements.

Indicators for 2021

We do not register any indicators for the judge yet.

Indicators for 2017

Number of Constitutional Court decisions against the judge:

  • Issued – 1
  • Delays prior to case assignment – 1

The judge was mostly assigned to Civil agenda. The judge mostly issued judgements in Civil agenda.

The judge worked 1481 days in the period and was assigned on average 36 cases per 100 days in main agendas.

Evaluation

In 2017, the judge received in total 16 from 40 possible points and ranked on 549 – 560. place of 651 evaluated judges.

  • Quality – 3 out of 15 points
  • Effectivity – 13 out of 25 points

Chart Comparison

Legend
Advanced Comparison
The chart is most useful for comparisons of judges at the same or similar courts, and those who decide cases in the same or similar agenda. Specific courts and agendas have an impact on the overall performance of judges. Simply put, commercial judge from Bratislava and criminal judge from Rožňava decide uncomparable cases.

Quality Indicators

The judge's judgements were on appeal affirmed in 53% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 68.7%.

  • Number of Appellate Decisions – 347
  • Number of Affirmed Decisions – 184

An appeal against the judge's judgements is filed in 13.4% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 10.1%.

Of the total number of the judge's judgements 6.3% is changed or reversed. The average in the same agenda is 3.1%.

Effectivity Indicators

Estimated average length of proceedings is 300.6 days. The average at the end of 2017 was 340.8 days.

The judge had 168 unresolved cases at the end of 2017. The average was 192.7 cases.

The judge had 96 restant cases at the end of 2017. The average was 111.7. This represents 57.1% of the judge's unresolved cases. Average was 54.1%.

In 2017, the judge was able to resolve 142.7% of assigned cases. Average was 141.8%.

Indicators for 2015

Number of Constitutional Court decisions against the judge:

  • Issued – 1
  • Delays prior to case assignment – 1

The judge was mostly assigned to Civil agenda. The judge mostly issued judgements in Civil agenda.

The judge worked 1053 days in the period and was assigned on average 32 cases per 100 days in main agendas.

Evaluation

In 2015, the judge received in total 14.5 from 40 possible points and ranked on 639 – 649. place of 738 evaluated judges.

  • Quality – 3 out of 15 points
  • Effectivity – 11.5 out of 25 points

Chart Comparison

Legend
Advanced Comparison
The chart is most useful for comparisons of judges at the same or similar courts, and those who decide cases in the same or similar agenda. Specific courts and agendas have an impact on the overall performance of judges. Simply put, commercial judge from Bratislava and criminal judge from Rožňava decide uncomparable cases.

Quality Indicators

The judge's judgements were on appeal affirmed in 49.6% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 67.1%.

  • Number of Appellate Decisions – 236
  • Number of Affirmed Decisions – 117

An appeal against the judge's judgements is filed in 12.4% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 9.3%.

Of the total number of the judge's judgements 6.2% is changed or reversed. The average in the same agenda is 3%.

Effectivity Indicators

Estimated average length of proceedings is 376 days. The average at the end of 2015 was 339 days.

The judge had 591 unresolved cases at the end of 2015. The average was 377 cases.

The judge had 259 restant cases at the end of 2015. The average was 150. This represents 43.8% of the judge's unresolved cases. Average was 42.6%.

In 2015, the judge was able to resolve 99.7% of assigned cases. Average was 97.1%.

Indicators for 2013

The number of Constitutional court judgements against the judges – issued 0 and delays prior to case assignment 0.

For the judge we register performance data for years 2011 – 2013:

Sudcovi bola prideľovaná najmä Občiansko–právna agenda. Sudca rozhodoval najmä v Občiansko–právnej agende.

The judge in this period worked 619 days and on average was assigned 168 cases in 10 days in main agendas.

Chart Comparison

Legend
Advanced Comparison
The chart is most useful for comparisons of judges at the same or similar courts, and those who decide cases in the same or similar agenda. Specific courts and agendas have an impact on the overall performance of judges. Simply put, commercial judge from Bratislava and criminal judge from Rožňava decide uncomparable cases.

Quality indicators

Rozhodnutie sudcu bolo v prípade odvolania potvrdené v 57,3% prípadoch, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 62,9%.

  • Number of appellate judgements – 131
  • Number of confirmed judgements – 75

Odvolanie proti rozhodnutiam sudcu je podávané v približne 13% prípadoch, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 8,9%.

Z celkového počtu rozhodnutí sudcu je zmenených alebo zrušených 5,6%, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 3,3%.

Efficiency indicators

Odhadovaná priemerná dĺžka konania sporu je 266 dní. Priemer bol na konci roka 346 dní.

Sudca mal na konci roka 2013 nevybavených 346 prípadov. Priemer bol 238.

Sudca mal na konci roka 240 reštančných vecí, pričom priemer je 126. To u sudcu tvorí 59,3% z nevybavených vecí. Priemer je 43,4.

Sudca dokázal v roku 2013 vybaviť, k počtu pridelených vecí, 150,8% prípadov. Priemer bol 99,6%.

Sudca získal podľa našej metodológie celkovo 16,75 bodov. Spomedzi 739 hodnotených sudcov sa umiestnil na 578 – 584. mieste. Za kvalitu získal 4,5 z 15 možných bodov, za efektivitu 12,25 z 25.

Notes

obtained from annual statistical reports of judges pertaining to indicators.

  • 2012 – 26. – 27. 04. 2012 – pracovné stretnutie sudcov obvodu Krajského súdu v Banskej Bystrici, 21. – 22. 05. 2012 – pracovné stretnutie sudcov Okresného súdu Zvolen, 18. – 19. 06. 2012 – spory o vlastnícke právo k nehnuteľnostiam a kataster nehnuteľností
  • 2011 – žiadna; 2012 – 26. – 27. 04. 2012 – pracovné stretnutie sudcov obvodu Krajského súdu v Banskej Bystrici, 21. – 22. 05. 2012 – pracovné stretnutie sudcov Okresného súdu Zvolen, 18. – 19. 06. 2012 – spory o vlastnícke právo k nehnuteľnostiam a kataster nehnuteľností
  • 2011 – žiadna
  • 2011 – od 1. 1. 2011 do 31. 3. 2011 z dôvodu výkonu funkcie podpredsedu súdu (v období od 1. 2. 2011 do 31. 3. 2011 aj zastupovanie predsedu súdu)
  • 2011 – od 1. 1. 2011 do 31. 3. 2011 z dôvodu výkonu funkcie podpredsedu súdu (v období od 1. 2. 2011 do 31. 3. 2011 aj zastupovanie predsedu súdu)

Published judgements

  1. Rozsudok pre uznanie – Spotrebiteľské zmluvy
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  2. Uznesenie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  3. Rozsudok bez odôvodnenia – Starostlivosť o maloletých
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  4. Rozsudok pre uznanie – Spotrebiteľské zmluvy
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  5. Rozsudok bez odôvodnenia – Ostatné
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  6. Rozsudok pre uznanie – Zmluvy
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  7. Rozsudok bez odôvodnenia – Rozvod
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  8. Rozsudok bez odôvodnenia – Rozvod
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  9. Rozsudok pre uznanie – Zmluvy
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  10. Rozsudok – Spotrebiteľské zmluvy
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

More judgements

Upcoming hearings

We do not register any upcoming hearings for the judge yet.

Past hearings

  1. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, o určenie že výpoveď je… Hearing was held on

  2. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, Žaloba o zaplatenie istiny vo… Hearing was held on

  3. Verejné vyhlásenie rozsudku, vydanie bezdôvodného… Hearing was held on

  4. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, návrh na úpravu výkonu… Hearing was held on

  5. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, o zaplatenie 1366,92 Eur s… Hearing was held on

  6. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, zaplatenie 3 000,- Eur s prísl. Hearing was held on

  7. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, o zaplatenie 1679,92 EUR s… Hearing was held on

  8. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, Žaloba o zaplatenie sumy… Hearing was held on

  9. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, o zaplatenie 15 235 Eur s… Hearing was held on

  10. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, zaplatenie 3 000,- Eur s prísl. Hearing was held on

More hearings

Information regarding the court were obtained from the judge list, which was most recently updated on . The information may have been additionally supplemented by the data retrieved from property declarations and statistical reports.