JUDr. Agáta Štefaničová

  1. Active vice chairman at the court Okresný súd Michalovce, we register 2,643 hearings and 1,892 judgements.

Indicators for 2021

We do not register any indicators for the judge yet.

Indicators for 2017

Number of Constitutional Court decisions against the judge:

  • Issued – 0
  • Delays prior to case assignment – 0

The judge was mostly assigned to Civil agenda. The judge mostly issued judgements in Civil agenda.

The judge worked 1518 days in the period and was assigned on average 13 cases per 100 days in main agendas.

Evaluation

In 2017, the judge received in total 24 from 40 possible points and ranked on 201 – 223. place of 651 evaluated judges.

  • Quality – 9 out of 15 points
  • Effectivity – 15 out of 25 points

Chart Comparison

Legend
Advanced Comparison

Judge position

Judgement agenda

Similar court
The chart is most useful for comparisons of judges at the same or similar courts, and those who decide cases in the same or similar agenda. Specific courts and agendas have an impact on the overall performance of judges. Simply put, commercial judge from Bratislava and criminal judge from Rožňava decide uncomparable cases.

Quality Indicators

The judge's judgements were on appeal affirmed in 73% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 68.7%.

  • Number of Appellate Decisions – 274
  • Number of Affirmed Decisions – 200

An appeal against the judge's judgements is filed in 12.1% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 10.1%.

Of the total number of the judge's judgements 3.3% is changed or reversed. The average in the same agenda is 3.1%.

Effectivity Indicators

Estimated average length of proceedings is 286.3 days. The average at the end of 2017 was 340.8 days.

The judge had 160 unresolved cases at the end of 2017. The average was 192.7 cases.

The judge had 94 restant cases at the end of 2017. The average was 111.7. This represents 58.8% of the judge's unresolved cases. Average was 54.1%.

In 2017, the judge was able to resolve 174.4% of assigned cases. Average was 141.8%.

Indicators for 2015

Number of Constitutional Court decisions against the judge:

  • Issued – 0
  • Delays prior to case assignment – 0

The judge was mostly assigned to Civil agenda. The judge mostly issued judgements in Civil agenda.

The judge worked 1089 days in the period and was assigned on average 15 cases per 100 days in main agendas.

Evaluation

In 2015, the judge received in total 27 from 40 possible points and ranked on 134 – 152. place of 738 evaluated judges.

  • Quality – 12 out of 15 points
  • Effectivity – 15 out of 25 points

Chart Comparison

Legend
Advanced Comparison

Judge position

Judgement agenda

Similar court
The chart is most useful for comparisons of judges at the same or similar courts, and those who decide cases in the same or similar agenda. Specific courts and agendas have an impact on the overall performance of judges. Simply put, commercial judge from Bratislava and criminal judge from Rožňava decide uncomparable cases.

Quality Indicators

The judge's judgements were on appeal affirmed in 81.1% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 67.1%.

  • Number of Appellate Decisions – 148
  • Number of Affirmed Decisions – 120

An appeal against the judge's judgements is filed in 9.6% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 9.3%.

Of the total number of the judge's judgements 1.8% is changed or reversed. The average in the same agenda is 3%.

Effectivity Indicators

Estimated average length of proceedings is 287 days. The average at the end of 2015 was 339 days.

The judge had 465 unresolved cases at the end of 2015. The average was 377 cases.

The judge had 171 restant cases at the end of 2015. The average was 150. This represents 36.8% of the judge's unresolved cases. Average was 42.6%.

In 2015, the judge was able to resolve 100.3% of assigned cases. Average was 97.1%.

Indicators for 2013

We do not register any indicators for the judge yet.

Published judgements

  1. Rozsudok – Spotrebiteľské zmluvy
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  2. Rozsudok – Spotrebiteľské zmluvy
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  3. Rozsudok – Spotrebiteľské zmluvy
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  4. Rozhodnutie – Spotrebiteľské zmluvy
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  5. Uznesenie – Exekúcia a výkon rozhodnutí
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  6. Rozsudok – Ostatné
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  7. Rozsudok – Spotrebiteľské zmluvy
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  8. Rozhodnutie – Spotrebiteľské zmluvy
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  9. Rozsudok – Spotrebiteľské zmluvy
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  10. Uznesenie – Exekúcia a výkon rozhodnutí
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

More judgements

Upcoming hearings

We do not register any upcoming hearings for the judge yet.

Past hearings

  1. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, zaplatenie splatných splátok… Hearing was held on

  2. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, o zaplatenie 4651,13 Eur s… Hearing was held on

  3. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, o zaplatenie 1530,82 Eur s… Hearing was held on

  4. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, 863,66 Eur s príslušenstvom Hearing was held on

  5. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, zaplatenie splatných splátok… Hearing was held on

  6. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, o zaplatenie 123,64 EUR s… Hearing was held on

  7. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, 173,31 Eur s príslušenstvom Hearing was held on

  8. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, 99.000,- € s prísl. Hearing was held on

  9. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, 1.976,27 € s prísl. Hearing was held on

  10. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, Žaloba o zaplatenie 261,42… Hearing was held on

More hearings

Information regarding the court were obtained from the judge list, which was most recently updated on . The information may have been additionally supplemented by the data retrieved from property declarations and statistical reports.