Mgr. Zuzana Dojčánová

  1. Active judge at the court Okresný súd Galanta, we register 3,757 hearings and 3,891 judgements.
  1. The judge has been nominated to function for more than 9 years.

Indicators for 2021

Overall evaluation of the judge is excellent.
Incoming cases for the judge in 2021 were mostly from civil agenda. Judge's decrees in 2021 were mostly from civil agenda.

Component – Quality

We register 78.85% decrees for the judge, which are confirmed by the higher court in case of an appeal. The median amongst judges is 68,9%. We register 331 decrees concerning appeals.
In this dimension the judge belongs to the group that is better than average.

Component – Effectivity

The judge had overal appointment of cases of 95.29% in 2021. The median amongst judges is 107,9%.
Anticipated time of the judge was based on data from 2021 280 days. Median amongst judges was 224,3 days.
In 2021 the judge decided 567 cases in the observed agendas.
In this dimension the judge belongs to the group that is average.

Component – Productivity

Weighted product of the judge in 2021 was 403.224. Median amongst judges was 248,1.
For the judge we register 435 unresolved cases at the end of 2021. From those 28.97% are restant cases. Median amongst judges was 39,34% of restant cases from the total number of unresolved cases.
In this dimension the judge belongs to the group that is better than average.

Overall Evaluation
Evaluation on a scale from 0 to 10.

Indicators for 2017

Number of Constitutional Court decisions against the judge:

  • Issued – 0
  • Delays prior to case assignment – 0

The judge was mostly assigned to Civil agenda. The judge mostly issued judgements in Civil agenda.

The judge worked 725 days in the period and was assigned on average 41 cases per 100 days in main agendas.

Evaluation

In 2017, the judge received in total 35 from 40 possible points and ranked on 3 – 4. place of 651 evaluated judges.

  • Quality – 13.5 out of 15 points
  • Effectivity – 21.5 out of 25 points

Chart Comparison

Legend
Advanced Comparison

Judge position

Judgement agenda
The chart is most useful for comparisons of judges at the same or similar courts, and those who decide cases in the same or similar agenda. Specific courts and agendas have an impact on the overall performance of judges. Simply put, commercial judge from Bratislava and criminal judge from Rožňava decide uncomparable cases.

Quality Indicators

The judge's judgements were on appeal affirmed in 84.2% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 68.7%.

  • Number of Appellate Decisions – 183
  • Number of Affirmed Decisions – 154

An appeal against the judge's judgements is filed in 8.1% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 10.1%.

Of the total number of the judge's judgements 1.3% is changed or reversed. The average in the same agenda is 3.1%.

Effectivity Indicators

Estimated average length of proceedings is 173 days. The average at the end of 2017 was 340.8 days.

The judge had 137 unresolved cases at the end of 2017. The average was 192.7 cases.

The judge had 51 restant cases at the end of 2017. The average was 111.7. This represents 37.2% of the judge's unresolved cases. Average was 54.1%.

In 2017, the judge was able to resolve 238.8% of assigned cases. Average was 141.8%.

Indicators for 2015

Number of Constitutional Court decisions against the judge:

  • Issued – 0
  • Delays prior to case assignment – 0

The judge was mostly assigned to Civil agenda. The judge mostly issued judgements in Civil agenda.

The judge worked 294 days in the period and was assigned on average 49 cases per 100 days in main agendas.

Evaluation

In 2015, the judge received in total 26.5 from 40 possible points and ranked on 153 – 167. place of 738 evaluated judges.

  • Quality – 10.5 out of 15 points
  • Effectivity – 16 out of 25 points

Chart Comparison

Legend
Advanced Comparison

Judge position

Judgement agenda
The chart is most useful for comparisons of judges at the same or similar courts, and those who decide cases in the same or similar agenda. Specific courts and agendas have an impact on the overall performance of judges. Simply put, commercial judge from Bratislava and criminal judge from Rožňava decide uncomparable cases.

Quality Indicators

The judge's judgements were on appeal affirmed in 76% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 67.1%.

  • Number of Appellate Decisions – 25
  • Number of Affirmed Decisions – 19

An appeal against the judge's judgements is filed in 2.3% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 9.3%.

Of the total number of the judge's judgements 0.6% is changed or reversed. The average in the same agenda is 3%.

Effectivity Indicators

Estimated average length of proceedings is 226 days. The average at the end of 2015 was 339 days.

The judge had 563 unresolved cases at the end of 2015. The average was 377 cases.

The judge had 135 restant cases at the end of 2015. The average was 150. This represents 24% of the judge's unresolved cases. Average was 42.6%.

In 2015, the judge was able to resolve 99.7% of assigned cases. Average was 97.1%.

Indicators for 2013

We do not register any indicators for the judge yet.

Published judgements

  1. Opravné uznesenie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  2. Uznesenie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  3. Uznesenie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  4. Uznesenie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  5. Uznesenie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  6. Rozsudok – Spotrebiteľské zmluvy
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  7. Rozsudok – Spotrebiteľské zmluvy
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  8. Rozsudok – Spotrebiteľské zmluvy
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  9. Rozsudok pre zmeškanie – Zmluvy
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  10. Rozsudok – Spotrebiteľské zmluvy
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

More judgements

Upcoming hearings

We do not register any upcoming hearings for the judge yet.

Past hearings

  1. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, vrátenie daru Hearing was held on

  2. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, Žaloba o nahradenie prejavu… Hearing was held on

  3. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, žaloba o zrušenie a… Hearing was held on

  4. Verejné vyhlásenie rozsudku, o zaplatenie 565,76 Eur s… Hearing was held on

  5. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, o zaplatenie 28.643,60 Eur s… Hearing was held on

  6. Verejné vyhlásenie rozsudku, o zaplatenie 932,04 Eur s… Hearing was held on

  7. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, o zaplatenie 2.979,18 EUR s… Hearing was held on

  8. Verejné vyhlásenie rozsudku, o zaplatenie 285,79 Eur s… Hearing was held on

  9. Verejné vyhlásenie rozsudku, o zaplatenie 284,7 Eur s… Hearing was held on

  10. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, Žaloba o zaplatenie 12.048,69… Hearing was held on

More hearings

Information regarding the court were obtained from the judge list, which was most recently updated on . The information may have been additionally supplemented by the data retrieved from property declarations and statistical reports.