JUDr. Bc. Viktor Marko, PhD.

  1. Active judge at the court Krajský súd Banská Bystrica, we register 391 hearings and 41 judgements.
  2. Inactive judge at the court Okresný súd Zvolen, we register 2,162 hearings and 1,884 judgements.

Close persons acknowledged in property declarations in years 2014.

Close persons acknowledged in property declaration in a year 2014:

Indicators for 2021

We do not register any indicators for the judge yet.

Indicators for 2017

We do not register any indicators for the judge yet.

Indicators for 2015

Number of Constitutional Court decisions against the judge:

  • Issued – 0
  • Delays prior to case assignment – 0

The judge was mostly assigned to Criminal agenda. The judge mostly issued judgements in Criminal agenda.

The judge worked 399 days in the period and was assigned on average 32 cases per 100 days in main agendas.

Evaluation

In 2015, the judge received in total 19.5 from 40 possible points and ranked on 467 – 491. place of 738 evaluated judges.

  • Quality – 4.5 out of 15 points
  • Effectivity – 15 out of 25 points

Chart Comparison

Legend
Advanced Comparison
The chart is most useful for comparisons of judges at the same or similar courts, and those who decide cases in the same or similar agenda. Specific courts and agendas have an impact on the overall performance of judges. Simply put, commercial judge from Bratislava and criminal judge from Rožňava decide uncomparable cases.

Quality Indicators

The judge's judgements were on appeal affirmed in 55.6% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 63.8%.

  • Number of Appellate Decisions – 45
  • Number of Affirmed Decisions – 25

An appeal against the judge's judgements is filed in 6.8% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 8.1%.

Of the total number of the judge's judgements 3% is changed or reversed. The average in the same agenda is 3%.

Effectivity Indicators

Estimated average length of proceedings is 147 days. The average at the end of 2015 was 339 days.

The judge had 139 unresolved cases at the end of 2015. The average was 377 cases.

The judge had 71 restant cases at the end of 2015. The average was 150. This represents 51.1% of the judge's unresolved cases. Average was 42.6%.

In 2015, the judge was able to resolve 98% of assigned cases. Average was 97.1%.

Indicators for 2013

We do not register any indicators for the judge yet.

Published judgements

  1. Uznesenie – Poriadok vo verejných veciach
    Zrušené
    Judgement was issued on

  2. Uznesenie – Majetok
    Potvrdené
    Judgement was issued on

  3. Uznesenie – Poriadok vo verejných veciach
    Potvrdené
    Judgement was issued on

  4. Uznesenie – Rodina a mládež
    Potvrdené
    Judgement was issued on

  5. Rozsudok – Poriadok vo verejných veciach
    Zmenené
    Judgement was issued on

  6. Uznesenie – Iné práva a slobody
    Potvrdené
    Judgement was issued on

  7. Uznesenie – Majetok
    Potvrdené
    Judgement was issued on

  8. Rozsudok – Život a zdravie
    Zmenené
    Judgement was issued on

  9. Uznesenie – Ostatné
    Potvrdené
    Judgement was issued on

  10. Uznesenie – Život a zdravie
    Potvrdené
    Judgement was issued on

More judgements

Upcoming hearings

We do not register any upcoming hearings for the judge yet.

Past hearings

  1. Verejné zasadnutie bez rozhodnutia, Obžaloba Hearing was held on

  2. Verejné zasadnutie s rozhodnutím, uloženie ochranného… Hearing was held on

  3. Verejné zasadnutie s rozhodnutím, p207/1,3 Hearing was held on

  4. Verejné zasadnutie s rozhodnutím, p194/1,2 Hearing was held on

  5. Verejné zasadnutie s rozhodnutím, Z208/1,3 a iné Hearing was held on

  6. Verejné zasadnutie s rozhodnutím, Z20, 189/1,2 Hearing was held on

  7. Verejné zasadnutie s rozhodnutím, P375/1,2, P374/1 a iné Hearing was held on

  8. Verejné zasadnutie s rozhodnutím, Z201/1 Hearing was held on

  9. Verejné zasadnutie s rozhodnutím, Z212/1,3 a iné Hearing was held on

  10. Verejné zasadnutie s rozhodnutím, Z20, 276/1,4 Hearing was held on

More hearings

Information regarding the court were obtained from the judge list, which was most recently updated on . The information may have been additionally supplemented by the data retrieved from property declarations and statistical reports.