JUDr. Jozef Engel

  1. Active judge at the court Okresný súd Humenné, we register 4,763 hearings and 3,192 judgements.
  2. Inactive judge at the court Krajský súd Prešov, in the meantime we register no hearings and no judgements.

obtained from annual statistical reports of judges.

Indicators for 2021

Overall evaluation of the judge is average.
Incoming cases for the judge in 2021 were mostly from civil agenda. Judge's decrees in 2021 were mostly from civil agenda.

Component – Quality

We register 62.93% decrees for the judge, which are confirmed by the higher court in case of an appeal. The median amongst judges is 68,9%. We register 607 decrees concerning appeals.
In this dimension the judge belongs to the group that is worse than average.

Component – Effectivity

The judge had overal appointment of cases of 115.71% in 2021. The median amongst judges is 107,9%.
Anticipated time of the judge was based on data from 2021 253 days. Median amongst judges was 224,3 days.
In 2021 the judge decided 302 cases in the observed agendas.
In this dimension the judge belongs to the group that is average.

Component – Productivity

Weighted product of the judge in 2021 was 298.868. Median amongst judges was 248,1.
For the judge we register 209 unresolved cases at the end of 2021. From those 35.41% are restant cases. Median amongst judges was 39,34% of restant cases from the total number of unresolved cases.
In this dimension the judge belongs to the group that is better than average.

Overall Evaluation
Evaluation on a scale from 0 to 10.

Indicators for 2017

Number of Constitutional Court decisions against the judge:

  • Issued – 0
  • Delays prior to case assignment – 0

The judge was mostly assigned to Civil agenda. The judge mostly issued judgements in Civil agenda.

The judge worked 1274 days in the period and was assigned on average 64 cases per 100 days in main agendas.

Evaluation

In 2017, the judge received in total 5 from 40 possible points and ranked on 648. place of 651 evaluated judges.

  • Quality – 3 out of 15 points
  • Effectivity – 2 out of 25 points

Chart Comparison

Legend
Advanced Comparison
The chart is most useful for comparisons of judges at the same or similar courts, and those who decide cases in the same or similar agenda. Specific courts and agendas have an impact on the overall performance of judges. Simply put, commercial judge from Bratislava and criminal judge from Rožňava decide uncomparable cases.

Quality Indicators

The judge's judgements were on appeal affirmed in 54.6% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 68.7%.

  • Number of Appellate Decisions – 390
  • Number of Affirmed Decisions – 213

An appeal against the judge's judgements is filed in 16.4% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 10.1%.

Of the total number of the judge's judgements 7.4% is changed or reversed. The average in the same agenda is 3.1%.

Effectivity Indicators

Estimated average length of proceedings is 593.6 days. The average at the end of 2017 was 340.8 days.

The judge had 161 unresolved cases at the end of 2017. The average was 192.7 cases.

The judge had 101 restant cases at the end of 2017. The average was 111.7. This represents 62.7% of the judge's unresolved cases. Average was 54.1%.

In 2017, the judge was able to resolve 41.9% of assigned cases. Average was 141.8%.

Indicators for 2015

Number of Constitutional Court decisions against the judge:

  • Issued – 0
  • Delays prior to case assignment – 0

The judge was mostly assigned to Civil agenda. The judge mostly issued judgements in Civil agenda.

The judge worked 1038 days in the period and was assigned on average 55 cases per 100 days in main agendas.

Evaluation

In 2015, the judge received in total 15 from 40 possible points and ranked on 623 – 638. place of 738 evaluated judges.

  • Quality – 3 out of 15 points
  • Effectivity – 12 out of 25 points

Chart Comparison

Legend
Advanced Comparison
The chart is most useful for comparisons of judges at the same or similar courts, and those who decide cases in the same or similar agenda. Specific courts and agendas have an impact on the overall performance of judges. Simply put, commercial judge from Bratislava and criminal judge from Rožňava decide uncomparable cases.

Quality Indicators

The judge's judgements were on appeal affirmed in 53.4% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 67.1%.

  • Number of Appellate Decisions – 343
  • Number of Affirmed Decisions – 183

An appeal against the judge's judgements is filed in 15.5% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 9.3%.

Of the total number of the judge's judgements 7.3% is changed or reversed. The average in the same agenda is 3%.

Effectivity Indicators

Estimated average length of proceedings is 306 days. The average at the end of 2015 was 339 days.

The judge had 662 unresolved cases at the end of 2015. The average was 377 cases.

The judge had 247 restant cases at the end of 2015. The average was 150. This represents 37.3% of the judge's unresolved cases. Average was 42.6%.

In 2015, the judge was able to resolve 86.1% of assigned cases. Average was 97.1%.

Indicators for 2013

The number of Constitutional court judgements against the judges – issued 0 and delays prior to case assignment 0.

For the judge we register performance data for years 2011 – 2013:

Sudcovi bola prideľovaná najmä Občiansko–právna agenda. Sudca rozhodoval najmä v Občiansko–právnej agende.

The judge in this period worked 653 days and on average was assigned 178 cases in 10 days in main agendas.

Chart Comparison

Legend
Advanced Comparison
The chart is most useful for comparisons of judges at the same or similar courts, and those who decide cases in the same or similar agenda. Specific courts and agendas have an impact on the overall performance of judges. Simply put, commercial judge from Bratislava and criminal judge from Rožňava decide uncomparable cases.

Quality indicators

Rozhodnutie sudcu bolo v prípade odvolania potvrdené v 43,9% prípadoch, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 62,9%.

  • Number of appellate judgements – 212
  • Number of confirmed judgements – 93

Odvolanie proti rozhodnutiam sudcu je podávané v približne 17,8% prípadoch, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 8,9%.

Z celkového počtu rozhodnutí sudcu je zmenených alebo zrušených 10%, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 3,3%.

Efficiency indicators

Odhadovaná priemerná dĺžka konania sporu je 197 dní. Priemer bol na konci roka 346 dní.

Sudca mal na konci roka 2013 nevybavených 209 prípadov. Priemer bol 238.

Sudca mal na konci roka 84 reštančných vecí, pričom priemer je 126. To u sudcu tvorí 32,9% z nevybavených vecí. Priemer je 43,4.

Sudca dokázal v roku 2013 vybaviť, k počtu pridelených vecí, 101,8% prípadov. Priemer bol 99,6%.

Sudca získal podľa našej metodológie celkovo 17,25 bodov. Spomedzi 739 hodnotených sudcov sa umiestnil na 556 – 573. mieste. Za kvalitu získal 1 z 15 možných bodov, za efektivitu 16,25 z 25.

Notes

obtained from annual statistical reports of judges pertaining to indicators.

  • 2013 – Seminár sudcov Stará Lesná – 2 dni
  • 2012 – odborný seminár 2 dni
  • 2012 – celoročne 1/3 nápadu P od 1.1.2012 do 31.3.2012 nápad v agende C 2/3 od 1.4.2012 znížený na 1/2 od 1.4.2012 nápad v agende Cb 1/3
  • 2011 – odborný seminár 24.11.2011 – Prešov – l deň; 2012 – odborný seminár 2 dni; 2013 – Seminár sudcov Stará Lesná – 2 dni
  • 2011 – odborný seminár 24.11.2011 – Prešov – l deň
  • 2011 – od 1.9.2011 zastavený nápad v agende Cb, od 1.9.2011 pridelný nápad v agende P –1/3; 2012 – celoročne 1/3 nápadu P od 1.1.2012 do 31.3.2012 nápad v agende C 2/3 od 1.4.2012 znížený na 1/2 od 1.4.2012 nápad v agende Cb 1/3
  • 2011 – od 1.9.2011 zastavený nápad v agende Cb, od 1.9.2011 pridelný nápad v agende P –1/3

Published judgements

  1. Uznesenie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  2. Uznesenie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  3. Uznesenie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  4. Rozsudok – Spotrebiteľské zmluvy
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  5. Uznesenie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  6. Uznesenie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  7. Uznesenie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  8. Rozsudok – Spotrebiteľské zmluvy
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  9. Rozsudok – Spotrebiteľské zmluvy
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  10. Rozsudok – Spotrebiteľské zmluvy
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

More judgements

Upcoming hearings

We do not register any upcoming hearings for the judge yet.

Past hearings

  1. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, zaplatenie nemajetkovej ujmy… Hearing was held on

  2. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, o vyporiadanie BSM Hearing was held on

  3. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, vyporiadanie BSM Hearing was held on

  4. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, o zaplatenie 9483,11 EUR s… Hearing was held on

  5. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, vypratanie a odovzdanie bytu… Hearing was held on

  6. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, o určenie vlastníckeho práva Hearing was held on

  7. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, Žaloba o zaplatenie istiny vo… Hearing was held on

  8. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, o zaplatenie 549,62 eur s… Hearing was held on

  9. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, o určenie neplatnosti… Hearing was held on

  10. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, o zaplatenie 6693,66 EUR s… Hearing was held on

More hearings

Information regarding the court were obtained from the judge list, which was most recently updated on . The information may have been additionally supplemented by the data retrieved from property declarations and statistical reports.