Mgr. Ing. Judita Gabonaiová Hrenčuková

  1. Active judge at the court Okresný súd Rožňava, we register 375 hearings and 321 judgements.
  1. The judge has been nominated to function for more than 9 years.

Close persons acknowledged in property declarations in years 2014.

Close persons acknowledged in property declaration in a year 2014:

Indicators for 2021

Overall evaluation of the judge is excellent.
Incoming cases for the judge in 2021 were mostly from civil agenda. Judge's decrees in 2021 were mostly from civil agenda.

Component – Quality

We register 65.87% decrees for the judge, which are confirmed by the higher court in case of an appeal. The median amongst judges is 68,9%. We register 126 decrees concerning appeals.
In this dimension the judge belongs to the group that is average.

Component – Effectivity

The judge had overal appointment of cases of 118.78% in 2021. The median amongst judges is 107,9%.
Anticipated time of the judge was based on data from 2021 136 days. Median amongst judges was 224,3 days.
In 2021 the judge decided 272 cases in the observed agendas.
In this dimension the judge belongs to the group that is better than average.

Component – Productivity

Weighted product of the judge in 2021 was 272. Median amongst judges was 248,1.
For the judge we register 95 unresolved cases at the end of 2021. From those 22.11% are restant cases. Median amongst judges was 39,34% of restant cases from the total number of unresolved cases.
In this dimension the judge belongs to the group that is better than average.

Overall Evaluation
Evaluation on a scale from 0 to 10.

Indicators for 2017

Number of Constitutional Court decisions against the judge:

  • Issued – 0
  • Delays prior to case assignment – 0

The judge was mostly assigned to Civil agenda. The judge mostly issued judgements in Civil agenda.

The judge worked 627 days in the period and was assigned on average 21 cases per 100 days in main agendas.

Evaluation

In 2017, the judge received in total 26 from 40 possible points and ranked on 113 – 132. place of 651 evaluated judges.

  • Quality – 7.5 out of 15 points
  • Effectivity – 18.5 out of 25 points

Chart Comparison

Legend
Advanced Comparison
The chart is most useful for comparisons of judges at the same or similar courts, and those who decide cases in the same or similar agenda. Specific courts and agendas have an impact on the overall performance of judges. Simply put, commercial judge from Bratislava and criminal judge from Rožňava decide uncomparable cases.

Quality Indicators

The judge's judgements were on appeal affirmed in 66.7% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 68.7%.

  • Number of Appellate Decisions – 24
  • Number of Affirmed Decisions – 16

An appeal against the judge's judgements is filed in 1.9% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 10.1%.

Of the total number of the judge's judgements 0.6% is changed or reversed. The average in the same agenda is 3.1%.

Effectivity Indicators

Estimated average length of proceedings is 143.1 days. The average at the end of 2017 was 340.8 days.

The judge had 69 unresolved cases at the end of 2017. The average was 192.7 cases.

The judge had 34 restant cases at the end of 2017. The average was 111.7. This represents 49.3% of the judge's unresolved cases. Average was 54.1%.

In 2017, the judge was able to resolve 179.6% of assigned cases. Average was 141.8%.

Indicators for 2015

We do not register any indicators for the judge yet.

Indicators for 2013

We do not register any indicators for the judge yet.

Published judgements

  1. Uznesenie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  2. Uznesenie – Vlastnícke právo k nehnuteľnostiam
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  3. Uznesenie – Spätvzatie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  4. Uznesenie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  5. Rozsudok – Spotrebiteľské zmluvy
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  6. Rozsudok – Spotrebiteľské zmluvy
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  7. Rozsudok – Spotrebiteľské zmluvy
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  8. Uznesenie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  9. Rozsudok pre zmeškanie – Nájomná zmluva
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  10. Rozsudok – Spotrebiteľské zmluvy
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

More judgements

Upcoming hearings

We do not register any upcoming hearings for the judge yet.

Past hearings

  1. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, vyporiadanie bezpodielového… Hearing was held on

  2. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, o negatívne určenie… Hearing was held on

  3. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, Vyporiadanie bezpodielového… Hearing was held on

  4. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, Žaloba o zaplatenie… Hearing was held on

  5. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, určenie nehnuteľnosti do… Hearing was held on

  6. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, o zaplatenie 42390,5 Eur s… Hearing was held on

  7. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, Určenie neplatnosti kúpnej… Hearing was held on

  8. Verejné vyhlásenie rozsudku, o zaplatenie 80,55 EUR s… Hearing was held on

  9. Verejné vyhlásenie rozsudku, o zaplatenie 878,43 EUR s… Hearing was held on

  10. Verejné vyhlásenie rozsudku, Žaloba o zaplatenie 389,90 EUR… Hearing was held on

More hearings

Information regarding the court were obtained from the judge list, which was most recently updated on . The information may have been additionally supplemented by the data retrieved from property declarations and statistical reports.