JUDr. Erik Tomus

  1. Active judge at the court Krajský súd Bratislava, in the meantime we register no hearings and 2 judgements.
  2. Inactive judge at the court Okresný súd Malacky, we register 1,759 hearings and 2,629 judgements.

Indicators for 2021

Overall evaluation of the judge is excellent.
Incoming cases for the judge in 2021 were mostly from criminal agenda. Judge's decrees in 2021 were mostly from criminal agenda.

Component – Quality

We register 76.69% decrees for the judge, which are confirmed by the higher court in case of an appeal. The median amongst judges is 68,9%. We register 133 decrees concerning appeals.
In this dimension the judge belongs to the group that is better than average.

Component – Effectivity

The judge had overal appointment of cases of 123.04% in 2021. The median amongst judges is 107,9%.
Anticipated time of the judge was based on data from 2021 144 days. Median amongst judges was 224,3 days.
In 2021 the judge decided 235 cases in the observed agendas.
In this dimension the judge belongs to the group that is better than average.

Component – Productivity

Weighted product of the judge in 2021 was 257.328. Median amongst judges was 248,1.
For the judge we register 87 unresolved cases at the end of 2021. From those 50.57% are restant cases. Median amongst judges was 39,34% of restant cases from the total number of unresolved cases.
In this dimension the judge belongs to the group that is average.

Overall Evaluation
Evaluation on a scale from 0 to 10.

Indicators for 2017

Number of Constitutional Court decisions against the judge:

  • Issued – 0
  • Delays prior to case assignment – 0

The judge was mostly assigned to Criminal agenda. The judge mostly issued judgements in translation missing: en.judges.indicators_2015.basic.decided_agenda.trestná.

The judge worked 484 days in the period and was assigned on average 38 cases per 100 days in main agendas.

Evaluation

In 2017, the judge received in total 24 from 40 possible points and ranked on 201 – 223. place of 651 evaluated judges.

  • Quality – 9 out of 15 points
  • Effectivity – 15 out of 25 points

Chart Comparison

Legend
Additional Judges
Select other judges for comparison:
Advanced Comparison
Judge position
Judgement agenda
Similar court
The chart is most useful for comparisons of judges at the same or similar courts, and those who decide cases in the same or similar agenda. Specific courts and agendas have an impact on the overall performance of judges. Simply put, commercial judge from Bratislava and criminal judge from Rožňava decide uncomparable cases.

Quality Indicators

The judge's judgements were on appeal affirmed in 74.3% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 66%.

  • Number of Appellate Decisions – 35
  • Number of Affirmed Decisions – 26

An appeal against the judge's judgements is filed in 6% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 8.7%.

Of the total number of the judge's judgements 1.5% is changed or reversed. The average in the same agenda is 2.9%.

Effectivity Indicators

Estimated average length of proceedings is 188.6 days. The average at the end of 2017 was 340.8 days.

The judge had 155 unresolved cases at the end of 2017. The average was 192.7 cases.

The judge had 75 restant cases at the end of 2017. The average was 111.7. This represents 48.4% of the judge's unresolved cases. Average was 54.1%.

In 2017, the judge was able to resolve 121.5% of assigned cases. Average was 141.8%.

Indicators for 2015

We do not register any indicators for the judge yet.

Indicators for 2013

We do not register any indicators for the judge yet.

Published judgements

  1. Trestný rozkaz – Všeobecne nebezpečné a proti…
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami     Judgement was issued on

    Court – Okresný súd Malacky
    Judge – JUDr. Erik Tomus

  2. Trestný rozkaz – Rodina a mládež
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami     Judgement was issued on

    Court – Okresný súd Malacky
    Judge – JUDr. Erik Tomus

  3. Trestný rozkaz – Rodina a mládež
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami     Judgement was issued on

    Court – Okresný súd Malacky
    Judge – JUDr. Erik Tomus

  4. Trestný rozkaz – Rodina a mládež
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami     Judgement was issued on

    Court – Okresný súd Malacky
    Judge – JUDr. Erik Tomus

  5. Trestný rozkaz – Poriadok vo verejných veciach
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami     Judgement was issued on

    Court – Okresný súd Malacky
    Judge – JUDr. Erik Tomus

  6. Trestný rozkaz – Sloboda a ľudská dôstojnosť
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami     Judgement was issued on

    Court – Okresný súd Malacky
    Judge – JUDr. Erik Tomus

  7. Trestný rozkaz – Poriadok vo verejných veciach
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami     Judgement was issued on

    Court – Okresný súd Malacky
    Judge – JUDr. Erik Tomus

  8. Trestný rozkaz – Poriadok vo verejných veciach
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami     Judgement was issued on

    Court – Okresný súd Malacky
    Judge – JUDr. Erik Tomus

  9. Trestný rozkaz – Majetok
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami     Judgement was issued on

    Court – Okresný súd Malacky
    Judge – JUDr. Erik Tomus

  10. Rozsudok – Majetok
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami     Judgement was issued on

    Court – Okresný súd Malacky
    Judge – JUDr. Erik Tomus
More judgements

Upcoming hearings

We do not register any upcoming hearings for the judge yet.

Past hearings

  1. Hlavné pojednávanie s rozhodnutím, obžaloba Hearing was held on

    Court – Okresný súd Malacky
    Judge – JUDr. Erik Tomus
    Defendant – V. O.

  2. Verejné zasadnutie s rozhodnutím, Obžaloba Hearing was held on

    Court – Okresný súd Malacky
    Judge – JUDr. Erik Tomus
    Defendant – Y. I.

  3. Hlavné pojednávanie s rozhodnutím, Obžaloba Hearing was held on

    Court – Okresný súd Malacky
    Judge – JUDr. Erik Tomus
    Defendant – A. Y.

  4. Verejné zasadnutie s rozhodnutím, obžaloba Hearing was held on

    Court – Okresný súd Malacky
    Judge – JUDr. Erik Tomus
    Defendant – H. X.

  5. Hlavné pojednávanie s rozhodnutím, Obžaloba Hearing was held on

    Court – Okresný súd Malacky
    Judge – JUDr. Erik Tomus
    Defendant – O. Q.

  6. Hlavné pojednávanie s rozhodnutím, Obžaloba Hearing was held on

    Court – Okresný súd Malacky
    Judge – JUDr. Erik Tomus
    Defendant – W. X.

  7. Hlavné pojednávanie s rozhodnutím, Obžaloba Hearing was held on

    Court – Okresný súd Malacky
    Judge – JUDr. Erik Tomus
    Defendant – B. R.

  8. Verejné zasadnutie s rozhodnutím, obžaloba Hearing was held on

    Court – Okresný súd Malacky
    Judge – JUDr. Erik Tomus
    Defendant – D. N.

  9. Verejné zasadnutie s rozhodnutím, návrh na schválenie… Hearing was held on

    Court – Okresný súd Malacky
    Judge – JUDr. Erik Tomus
    Defendant – N. H.

  10. Hlavné pojednávanie s rozhodnutím, obžaloba Hearing was held on

    Court – Okresný súd Malacky
    Judge – JUDr. Erik Tomus
    Defendant – P. F.
More hearings

Information regarding the court were obtained from the judge list, which was most recently updated on . The information may have been additionally supplemented by the data retrieved from property declarations and statistical reports.