JUDr. Marián Furman

  1. Active judge at the court Okresný súd Poprad, we register 5,167 hearings and 2,211 judgements.

obtained from annual statistical reports of judges.

Indicators for 2017

Number of Constitutional Court decisions against the judge:

  • Issued – 3
  • Delays prior to case assignment – 1

The judge was mostly assigned to Family Agenda. The judge mostly issued judgements in Family Agenda.

The judge worked 1490 days in the period and was assigned on average 116 cases per 100 days in main agendas.

Evaluation

In 2017, the judge received in total 18.5 from 40 possible points and ranked on 464 – 477. place of 651 evaluated judges.

  • Quality – 7.5 out of 15 points
  • Effectivity – 11 out of 25 points

Chart Comparison

Legend
Advanced Comparison
The chart is most useful for comparisons of judges at the same or similar courts, and those who decide cases in the same or similar agenda. Specific courts and agendas have an impact on the overall performance of judges. Simply put, commercial judge from Bratislava and criminal judge from Rožňava decide uncomparable cases.

Quality Indicators

The judge's judgements were on appeal affirmed in 65.6% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 67.8%.

  • Number of Appellate Decisions – 244
  • Number of Affirmed Decisions – 160

An appeal against the judge's judgements is filed in 8.9% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 7.9%.

Of the total number of the judge's judgements 3% is changed or reversed. The average in the same agenda is 2.5%.

Effectivity Indicators

Estimated average length of proceedings is 276.7 days. The average at the end of 2017 was 340.8 days.

The judge had 235 unresolved cases at the end of 2017. The average was 192.7 cases.

The judge had 152 restant cases at the end of 2017. The average was 111.7. This represents 64.7% of the judge's unresolved cases. Average was 54.1%.

In 2017, the judge was able to resolve 103% of assigned cases. Average was 141.8%.

Indicators for 2015

Number of Constitutional Court decisions against the judge:

  • Issued – 2
  • Delays prior to case assignment – 1

The judge was mostly assigned to Family Agenda. The judge mostly issued judgements in Family Agenda.

The judge worked 1072 days in the period and was assigned on average 86 cases per 100 days in main agendas.

Evaluation

In 2015, the judge received in total 18.5 from 40 possible points and ranked on 507 – 524. place of 738 evaluated judges.

  • Quality – 7.5 out of 15 points
  • Effectivity – 11 out of 25 points

Quality Indicators

The judge's judgements were on appeal affirmed in 66.5% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 67.3%.

  • Number of Appellate Decisions – 188
  • Number of Affirmed Decisions – 125

An appeal against the judge's judgements is filed in 9.3% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 7.6%.

Of the total number of the judge's judgements 3.1% is changed or reversed. The average in the same agenda is 2.5%.

Effectivity Indicators

Estimated average length of proceedings is 295 days. The average at the end of 2015 was 339 days.

The judge had 369 unresolved cases at the end of 2015. The average was 377 cases.

The judge had 143 restant cases at the end of 2015. The average was 150. This represents 38.8% of the judge's unresolved cases. Average was 42.6%.

In 2015, the judge was able to resolve 80.1% of assigned cases. Average was 97.1%.

Indicators for 2013

The number of Constitutional court judgements against the judges – issued 1 and delays prior to case assignment 1.

For the judge we register performance data for years 2011:

Sudcovi bola prideľovaná najmä agenda Starostlivosti o maloletých. Sudca rozhodoval najmä v agende Starostlivosti o maloletých.

The judge in this period worked 216 days and on average was assigned 174 cases in 10 days in main agendas.

Quality indicators

Rozhodnutie sudcu bolo v prípade odvolania potvrdené v 82,6% prípadoch, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 65,5%.

  • Number of appellate judgements – 46
  • Number of confirmed judgements – 38

Odvolanie proti rozhodnutiam sudcu je podávané v približne 11% prípadoch, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 7,2%.

Z celkového počtu rozhodnutí sudcu je zmenených alebo zrušených 1,9%, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 2,5%.

Efficiency indicators

Pre sudcu evidujeme menej ako 20 rozhodnutí, preto jeho efektivitu nehodnotíme.

Notes

obtained from annual statistical reports of judges pertaining to indicators.

  • 2011 – Dvojdňový seminár – opatrovnícka agenda, Omšenie, apríl 2011.
  • 2011 – Dvojdňový seminár – opatrovnícka agenda, Omšenie, apríl 2011.

Published judgements

  1. Rozsudok – Rozvod
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  2. Rozsudok – Vyživovacie povinnosti
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  3. Rozsudok – Opatrovníctvo
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  4. Rozsudok – Starostlivosť o maloletých
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  5. Rozsudok – Rozvod
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  6. Rozsudok – Rozvod
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  7. Rozsudok – Opatrovníctvo
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  8. Rozsudok – Rozvod
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  9. Rozsudok – Opatrovníctvo
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  10. Rozsudok – Opatrovníctvo
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

More judgements

Upcoming hearings

  1. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, úprava práv a poviností k… Hearing will be held on

  2. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, návrh na zverenie a určenie… Hearing will be held on

  3. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, o náhradu škody spôsobenej… Hearing will be held on

  4. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, rozvod manželstva a úprava… Hearing will be held on

  5. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, zákaz styku + NO Hearing will be held on

  6. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, o určenie neplatnosti… Hearing will be held on

  7. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, schválenie právneho úkonu Hearing will be held on

  8. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, obmedzenie spôsobilosti na… Hearing will be held on

  9. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, o zverenie do náhradnej… Hearing will be held on

  10. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, úprava práv a poviností k… Hearing will be held on

More hearings

Past hearings

  1. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, o zrušenie vyživovacej… Hearing was held on

  2. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, zvýšenie výživného na mal. deti Hearing was held on

  3. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, o schválenie právneho úkonu Hearing was held on

  4. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, priznanie rodičovských práv… Hearing was held on

  5. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, návrh na zvýšenie výživného… Hearing was held on

  6. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, úprava práv a poviností k… Hearing was held on

  7. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, návrh na zvýšenie výživného… Hearing was held on

  8. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, o zrušenie vyživovacej… Hearing was held on

  9. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, o zaplatenie 939,49 EUR s… Hearing was held on

  10. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, zvýšenie výživného na mal.… Hearing was held on

More hearings

Information regarding the court were obtained from the judge list, which was most recently updated on . The information may have been additionally supplemented by the data retrieved from property declarations and statistical reports.