JUDr. Tatiana Redenkovičová

  1. Active judge at the court Mestský súd Bratislava IV, we register 2,220 hearings and 1,746 judgements.

Indicators for 2021

We do not register any indicators for the judge yet.

Indicators for 2017

Number of Constitutional Court decisions against the judge:

  • Issued – 4
  • Delays prior to case assignment – 2

The judge was mostly assigned to Civil agenda. The judge mostly issued judgements in Civil agenda.

The judge worked 1426 days in the period and was assigned on average 35 cases per 100 days in main agendas.

Evaluation

In 2017, the judge received in total 21.5 from 40 possible points and ranked on 317 – 344. place of 651 evaluated judges.

  • Quality – 10.5 out of 15 points
  • Effectivity – 11 out of 25 points

Chart Comparison

Legend
Additional Judges
Select other judges for comparison:
Advanced Comparison
The chart is most useful for comparisons of judges at the same or similar courts, and those who decide cases in the same or similar agenda. Specific courts and agendas have an impact on the overall performance of judges. Simply put, commercial judge from Bratislava and criminal judge from Rožňava decide uncomparable cases.

Quality Indicators

The judge's judgements were on appeal affirmed in 74.7% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 68.7%.

  • Number of Appellate Decisions – 253
  • Number of Affirmed Decisions – 189

An appeal against the judge's judgements is filed in 11.6% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 10.1%.

Of the total number of the judge's judgements 2.9% is changed or reversed. The average in the same agenda is 3.1%.

Effectivity Indicators

Estimated average length of proceedings is 361.9 days. The average at the end of 2017 was 340.8 days.

The judge had 237 unresolved cases at the end of 2017. The average was 192.7 cases.

The judge had 190 restant cases at the end of 2017. The average was 111.7. This represents 80.2% of the judge's unresolved cases. Average was 54.1%.

In 2017, the judge was able to resolve 148.4% of assigned cases. Average was 141.8%.

Indicators for 2015

Number of Constitutional Court decisions against the judge:

  • Issued – 4
  • Delays prior to case assignment – 2

The judge was mostly assigned to Civil agenda. The judge mostly issued judgements in Civil agenda.

The judge worked 1020 days in the period and was assigned on average 27 cases per 100 days in main agendas.

Evaluation

In 2015, the judge received in total 24.5 from 40 possible points and ranked on 238 – 261. place of 738 evaluated judges.

  • Quality – 10.5 out of 15 points
  • Effectivity – 14 out of 25 points

Chart Comparison

Legend
Additional Judges
Select other judges for comparison:
Advanced Comparison
The chart is most useful for comparisons of judges at the same or similar courts, and those who decide cases in the same or similar agenda. Specific courts and agendas have an impact on the overall performance of judges. Simply put, commercial judge from Bratislava and criminal judge from Rožňava decide uncomparable cases.

Quality Indicators

The judge's judgements were on appeal affirmed in 75.2% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 67.1%.

  • Number of Appellate Decisions – 153
  • Number of Affirmed Decisions – 115

An appeal against the judge's judgements is filed in 9.6% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 9.3%.

Of the total number of the judge's judgements 2.4% is changed or reversed. The average in the same agenda is 3%.

Effectivity Indicators

Estimated average length of proceedings is 310 days. The average at the end of 2015 was 339 days.

The judge had 467 unresolved cases at the end of 2015. The average was 377 cases.

The judge had 156 restant cases at the end of 2015. The average was 150. This represents 33.4% of the judge's unresolved cases. Average was 42.6%.

In 2015, the judge was able to resolve 95.6% of assigned cases. Average was 97.1%.

Indicators for 2013

The number of Constitutional court judgements against the judges – issued 1 and delays prior to case assignment 0.

For the judge we register performance data for years 2011 – 2013:

Sudcovi bola prideľovaná najmä Občiansko–právna agenda. Sudca rozhodoval najmä v Občiansko–právnej agende.

The judge in this period worked 610 days and on average was assigned 153 cases in 10 days in main agendas.

Chart Comparison

Legend
Additional Judges
Select other judges for comparison:
Advanced Comparison
The chart is most useful for comparisons of judges at the same or similar courts, and those who decide cases in the same or similar agenda. Specific courts and agendas have an impact on the overall performance of judges. Simply put, commercial judge from Bratislava and criminal judge from Rožňava decide uncomparable cases.

Quality indicators

Rozhodnutie sudcu bolo v prípade odvolania potvrdené v 61% prípadoch, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 62,9%.

  • Number of appellate judgements – 59
  • Number of confirmed judgements – 36

Odvolanie proti rozhodnutiam sudcu je podávané v približne 9,3% prípadoch, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 8,9%.

Z celkového počtu rozhodnutí sudcu je zmenených alebo zrušených 3,6%, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 3,3%.

Efficiency indicators

Odhadovaná priemerná dĺžka konania sporu je 1374 dní. Priemer bol na konci roka 346 dní.

Sudca mal na konci roka 2013 nevybavených 689 prípadov. Priemer bol 238.

Sudca mal na konci roka 568 reštančných vecí, pričom priemer je 126. To u sudcu tvorí 75,2% z nevybavených vecí. Priemer je 43,4.

Sudca dokázal v roku 2013 vybaviť, k počtu pridelených vecí, 39,7% prípadov. Priemer bol 99,6%.

Sudca získal podľa našej metodológie celkovo 7,25 bodov. Spomedzi 739 hodnotených sudcov sa umiestnil na 731 – 732. mieste. Za kvalitu získal 7,25 z 15 možných bodov, za efektivitu 0 z 25.

Notes

obtained from annual statistical reports of judges pertaining to indicators.

  • 2012 – Seminár – 3 dni
  • 2012 – Seminár – 3 dni

Published judgements

  1. Uznesenie – Vyživovacie povinnosti
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  2. Rozhodnutie – Vyživovacie povinnosti
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  3. Uznesenie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  4. Uznesenie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  5. Uznesenie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  6. Uznesenie – Ostatné
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  7. Uznesenie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  8. Uznesenie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  9. Uznesenie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  10. Uznesenie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

More judgements

Upcoming hearings

We do not register any upcoming hearings for the judge yet.

Past hearings

  1. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, žaloba na zaplatenie 167,76 €… Hearing was held on

  2. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, odstránenie plota Hearing was held on

  3. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, žaloba o vypratanie… Hearing was held on

  4. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, návrh na zaplatenie 13000,- €… Hearing was held on

  5. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, žaloba na zaplatenie… Hearing was held on

  6. Verejné vyhlásenie rozsudku, žaloba na zaplatenie 146,55 €… Hearing was held on

  7. Verejné zasadnutie bez rozhodnutia, Obžaloba § 364/1,2b Hearing was held on

  8. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, určenie neplatnosti kúpnej… Hearing was held on

  9. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, žaloba na zaplatenie… Hearing was held on

  10. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, žaloba na ochranu osobnosti a… Hearing was held on

More hearings

Information regarding the court were obtained from the judge list, which was most recently updated on . The information may have been additionally supplemented by the data retrieved from property declarations and statistical reports.