JUDr. Margaréta Jurková Žoldáková

  1. Active judge at the court Krajský súd Košice, we register 576 hearings and 87 judgements.
  2. Inactive judge at the court Mestský súd Košice, we register 199 hearings and 436 judgements.

Indicators for 2021

We do not register any indicators for the judge yet.

Indicators for 2017

We do not register any indicators for the judge yet.

Indicators for 2015

Number of Constitutional Court decisions against the judge:

  • Issued – 0
  • Delays prior to case assignment – 0

The judge was mostly assigned to Criminal agenda. The judge mostly issued judgements in Criminal agenda.

The judge worked 210 days in the period and was assigned on average 9 cases per 100 days in main agendas.

Evaluation

In 2015, the judge received in total 28.5 from 40 possible points and ranked on 91 – 106. place of 738 evaluated judges.

  • Quality – 12 out of 15 points
  • Effectivity – 16.5 out of 25 points

Chart Comparison

Legend
Advanced Comparison
The chart is most useful for comparisons of judges at the same or similar courts, and those who decide cases in the same or similar agenda. Specific courts and agendas have an impact on the overall performance of judges. Simply put, commercial judge from Bratislava and criminal judge from Rožňava decide uncomparable cases.

Quality Indicators

The judge's judgements were on appeal affirmed in 81.8% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 63.8%.

  • Number of Appellate Decisions – 22
  • Number of Affirmed Decisions – 18

An appeal against the judge's judgements is filed in 12.6% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 8.1%.

Of the total number of the judge's judgements 2.3% is changed or reversed. The average in the same agenda is 3%.

Effectivity Indicators

Estimated average length of proceedings is 136 days. The average at the end of 2015 was 339 days.

The judge had 65 unresolved cases at the end of 2015. The average was 377 cases.

The judge had 27 restant cases at the end of 2015. The average was 150. This represents 41.5% of the judge's unresolved cases. Average was 42.6%.

In 2015, the judge was able to resolve 94.6% of assigned cases. Average was 97.1%.

Indicators for 2013

We do not register any indicators for the judge yet.

Published judgements

  1. Rozsudok – Všeobecne nebezpečné a proti životnému…
    Zmenené
    Judgement was issued on

  2. Uznesenie – Majetok
    Potvrdzujúce
    Judgement was issued on

  3. Uznesenie – Majetok
    Potvrdzujúce
    Judgement was issued on

  4. Uznesenie – Majetok
    Potvrdzujúce
    Judgement was issued on

  5. Rozsudok – Iné práva a slobody
    Zmenené
    Judgement was issued on

  6. Uznesenie – Majetok
    Potvrdzujúce
    Judgement was issued on

  7. Uznesenie – Majetok
    Potvrdzujúce
    Judgement was issued on

  8. Rozsudok – Život a zdravie
    Zrušujúce
    Judgement was issued on

  9. Rozsudok – Majetok
    Zmenené
    Judgement was issued on

  10. Uznesenie – Život a zdravie
    Potvrdzujúce
    Judgement was issued on

More judgements

Upcoming hearings

We do not register any upcoming hearings for the judge yet.

Past hearings

  1. Verejné zasadnutie bez rozhodnutia, 4Pv 458/17 - § 222 ods.… Hearing was held on

  2. Verejné zasadnutie bez rozhodnutia, 2Pv 410/21 - § 194 ods.… Hearing was held on

  3. Verejné zasadnutie s rozhodnutím, 3Pv 85/18 -§ 360 ods. 1… Hearing was held on

  4. Verejné vyhlásenie rozsudku, Uznávacie konanie - Česká… Hearing was held on

  5. Verejné vyhlásenie rozsudku, Uznávacie konanie - Česká… Hearing was held on

  6. Verejné zasadnutie s rozhodnutím, Uznávacie konanie - Česká… Hearing was held on

  7. Verejné zasadnutie s rozhodnutím, 2Pv 457/20 - § 194… Hearing was held on

  8. Verejné zasadnutie bez rozhodnutia, 4Pv 458/17 - § 222 ods.… Hearing was held on

  9. Verejné zasadnutie s rozhodnutím, nevzatie do väzby - CPZ Hearing was held on

  10. Verejné zasadnutie s rozhodnutím, 1Pv 1022/11 - § 364 ods.… Hearing was held on

More hearings

Information regarding the court were obtained from the judge list, which was most recently updated on . The information may have been additionally supplemented by the data retrieved from property declarations and statistical reports.