JUDr. Jozef Šulek

  1. Active judge at the court Krajský súd Žilina, we register 33 hearings and 67 judgements.
  2. Inactive judge at the court Krajský súd Trenčín, we register 361 hearings and 46 judgements.
  3. Inactive judge at the court Okresný súd Trnava, we register 1,915 hearings and 1,823 judgements.

Indicators for 2021

We do not register any indicators for the judge yet.

Indicators for 2017

Number of Constitutional Court decisions against the judge:

  • Issued – 0
  • Delays prior to case assignment – 0

The judge was mostly assigned to Civil agenda. The judge mostly issued judgements in Civil agenda.

The judge worked 363 days in the period and was assigned on average 33 cases per 100 days in main agendas.

Evaluation

In 2017, the judge received in total 26 from 40 possible points and ranked on 113 – 132. place of 651 evaluated judges.

  • Quality – 10.5 out of 15 points
  • Effectivity – 15.5 out of 25 points

Chart Comparison

Legend
Advanced Comparison
The chart is most useful for comparisons of judges at the same or similar courts, and those who decide cases in the same or similar agenda. Specific courts and agendas have an impact on the overall performance of judges. Simply put, commercial judge from Bratislava and criminal judge from Rožňava decide uncomparable cases.

Quality Indicators

The judge's judgements were on appeal affirmed in 75% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 68.7%.

  • Number of Appellate Decisions – 44
  • Number of Affirmed Decisions – 33

An appeal against the judge's judgements is filed in 6.8% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 10.1%.

Of the total number of the judge's judgements 1.7% is changed or reversed. The average in the same agenda is 3.1%.

Effectivity Indicators

Estimated average length of proceedings is 272.3 days. The average at the end of 2017 was 340.8 days.

The judge had 282 unresolved cases at the end of 2017. The average was 192.7 cases.

The judge had 197 restant cases at the end of 2017. The average was 111.7. This represents 69.9% of the judge's unresolved cases. Average was 54.1%.

In 2017, the judge was able to resolve 201.1% of assigned cases. Average was 141.8%.

Indicators for 2015

We do not register any indicators for the judge yet.

Indicators for 2013

We do not register any indicators for the judge yet.

Published judgements

  1. Uznesenie
    Zmeňujúce
    Judgement was issued on

  2. Rozsudok – Ostatné
    Potvrdzujúce
    Judgement was issued on

  3. Uznesenie
    Odmietajúce odvolanie
    Judgement was issued on

  4. Rozsudok – Ostatné
    Potvrdzujúce
    Judgement was issued on

  5. Uznesenie
    Potvrdzujúce
    Judgement was issued on

  6. Uznesenie – Ostatné
    Pripúštajúce spätvzatie návrhu, zrušujúce rozsudok a…
    Judgement was issued on

  7. Uznesenie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  8. Uznesenie
    Iná povaha rozhodnutia
    Judgement was issued on

  9. Rozsudok – Ostatné
    Iná povaha rozhodnutia
    Judgement was issued on

  10. Uznesenie
    Iná povaha rozhodnutia
    Judgement was issued on

More judgements

Upcoming hearings

We do not register any upcoming hearings for the judge yet.

Past hearings

  1. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, určenie, že žalobkyňa je… Hearing was held on

  2. Verejné vyhlásenie rozsudku, nahrad. prejavu vôle a urč.… Hearing was held on

  3. Verejné vyhlásenie rozsudku, zrušenie bezpodielového… Hearing was held on

  4. Verejné vyhlásenie rozsudku, zaplatenie 731,32 eur s prísl. Hearing was held on

  5. Verejné vyhlásenie rozsudku, zrušenie a vyporiadanie… Hearing was held on

  6. Verejné vyhlásenie rozsudku, zrušenie a vyporiadanie… Hearing was held on

  7. Verejné vyhlásenie rozsudku, zákaz vstupu na pozemok Hearing was held on

  8. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, vyporiadanie BSM po rozvode Hearing was held on

  9. Verejné vyhlásenie rozsudku, zaplatenie 38.748,48 eur s… Hearing was held on

  10. Verejné vyhlásenie rozsudku, náhradu škody Hearing was held on

More hearings

Information regarding the court were obtained from the judge list, which was most recently updated on . The information may have been additionally supplemented by the data retrieved from property declarations and statistical reports.