JUDr. Lucia Tóth

  1. Active judge at the court Správny súd Bratislava, we register 63 hearings and no judgements.
  2. Inactive judge at the court Mestský súd Bratislava IV, we register 275 hearings and 257 judgements.

Indicators for 2021

We do not register any indicators for the judge yet.

Indicators for 2017

Number of Constitutional Court decisions against the judge:

  • Issued – 0
  • Delays prior to case assignment – 0

The judge was mostly assigned to Civil agenda. The judge mostly issued judgements in Civil agenda.

The judge worked 201 days in the period and was assigned on average 4 cases per 100 days in main agendas.

Evaluation

In 2017, the judge received in total 21 from 40 possible points and ranked on 345 – 368. place of 651 evaluated judges.

  • Quality – 7.5 out of 15 points
  • Effectivity – 13.5 out of 25 points

Chart Comparison

Legend
Additional Judges
Select other judges for comparison:
Advanced Comparison
Hide Filters
The chart is most useful for comparisons of judges at the same or similar courts, and those who decide cases in the same or similar agenda. Specific courts and agendas have an impact on the overall performance of judges. Simply put, commercial judge from Bratislava and criminal judge from Rožňava decide uncomparable cases.

Quality Indicators

The judge's judgements were on appeal affirmed in 66.7% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 68.7%.

  • Number of Appellate Decisions – 21
  • Number of Affirmed Decisions – 14

An appeal against the judge's judgements is filed in 13.8% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 10.1%.

Of the total number of the judge's judgements 4.6% is changed or reversed. The average in the same agenda is 3.1%.

Effectivity Indicators

Estimated average length of proceedings is 389 days. The average at the end of 2017 was 340.8 days.

The judge had 162 unresolved cases at the end of 2017. The average was 192.7 cases.

The judge had 106 restant cases at the end of 2017. The average was 111.7. This represents 65.4% of the judge's unresolved cases. Average was 54.1%.

In 2017, the judge was able to resolve 205.4% of assigned cases. Average was 141.8%.

Indicators for 2015

We do not register any indicators for the judge yet.

Indicators for 2013

We do not register any indicators for the judge yet.

Published judgements

  1. Uznesenie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami     Judgement was issued on

    Court – Mestský súd Bratislava IV
    Judge – JUDr. Lucia Tóth

  2. Uznesenie – Spotrebiteľské zmluvy
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami     Judgement was issued on

    Court – Mestský súd Bratislava IV
    Judge – JUDr. Lucia Tóth

  3. Uznesenie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami     Judgement was issued on

    Court – Mestský súd Bratislava IV
    Judge – JUDr. Lucia Tóth

  4. Uznesenie – Vlastnícke právo k nehnuteľnostiam
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami     Judgement was issued on

    Court – Mestský súd Bratislava IV
    Judge – JUDr. Lucia Tóth

  5. Uznesenie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami     Judgement was issued on

    Court – Mestský súd Bratislava IV
    Judge – JUDr. Lucia Tóth

  6. Rozsudok – Vlastnícke právo k nehnuteľnostiam
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami     Judgement was issued on

    Court – Mestský súd Bratislava IV
    Judge – JUDr. Lucia Tóth

  7. Uznesenie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami     Judgement was issued on

    Court – Mestský súd Bratislava IV
    Judge – JUDr. Lucia Tóth

  8. Uznesenie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami     Judgement was issued on

    Court – Mestský súd Bratislava IV
    Judge – JUDr. Lucia Tóth

  9. Rozsudok – Vlastnícke právo k nehnuteľnostiam Judgement was issued on

    Court – Mestský súd Bratislava IV
    Judge – JUDr. Lucia Tóth

  10. Rozsudok bez odôvodnenia – Poistenie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami     Judgement was issued on

    Court – Mestský súd Bratislava IV
    Judge – JUDr. Lucia Tóth
More judgements

Upcoming hearings

We do not register any upcoming hearings for the judge yet.

Past hearings

  1. Verejné vyhlásenie rozsudku, preskúmanie zákonnosti… Hearing was held on

    Court – Správny súd Bratislava
    Judge – JUDr. Lucia Tóth
    Proposer – O. F.
    Opponent – U. V.

  2. Verejné vyhlásenie rozsudku, žaloba o preskúmanie… Hearing was held on

    Court – Správny súd Bratislava
    Judge – JUDr. Lucia Tóth
    Proposer – Y. O.
    Opponent – Q. X.

  3. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, č.:103038162/2016 zo dňa… Hearing was held on

    Court – Správny súd Bratislava
    Judge – JUDr. Lucia Tóth
    Proposer – X. M.
    Opponent – E. V.

  4. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, č.: 1 RM/2015-34-I zo dňa… Hearing was held on

    Court – Správny súd Bratislava
    Judge – JUDr. Lucia Tóth
    Proposer – G. S.
    Opponent – G. T.

  5. Verejné vyhlásenie rozsudku, žaloba o preskúmanie… Hearing was held on

    Court – Správny súd Bratislava
    Judge – JUDr. Lucia Tóth
    Proposer – S. H.
    Opponent – E. T.

  6. Verejné vyhlásenie rozsudku, žaloba č. 102556501/2021 zo… Hearing was held on

    Court – Správny súd Bratislava
    Judge – JUDr. Lucia Tóth
    Proposer – B. I.
    Opponent – L. R.

  7. Verejné vyhlásenie rozsudku, č.:OU-BA-OVBP2-2020/80603/CUJ… Hearing was held on

    Court – Správny súd Bratislava
    Judge – JUDr. Lucia Tóth
    Proposer – G. C.
    Opponent – M. P.

  8. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, žaloba č. 100441234/2022 zo dňa… Hearing was held on

    Court – Správny súd Bratislava
    Judge – JUDr. Lucia Tóth
    Proposer – Z. M.
    Opponent – L. C.

  9. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, č.:102267154/2018 zo dňa… Hearing was held on

    Court – Správny súd Bratislava
    Judge – JUDr. Lucia Tóth
    Proposer – C. Q.
    Opponent – V. K.

  10. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, č.:Xo 9/12-BPR zo dňa 12.9.2016 Hearing was held on

    Court – Správny súd Bratislava
    Judge – JUDr. Lucia Tóth
    Proposer – A. E.
    Opponent – B. L.
More hearings

Information regarding the court were obtained from the judge list, which was most recently updated on . The information may have been additionally supplemented by the data retrieved from property declarations and statistical reports.