JUDr. Radovan Groman

  1. Active judge at the court Mestský súd Bratislava III, we register 105 hearings and no judgements.
  2. Inactive judge at the court Mestský súd Bratislava I, we register 3,407 hearings and 2,494 judgements.
  1. The judge has been nominated to function for about 15 years.

obtained from annual statistical reports of judges.

Indicators for 2021

We do not register any indicators for the judge yet.

Indicators for 2017

Number of Constitutional Court decisions against the judge:

  • Issued – 4
  • Delays prior to case assignment – 4

The judge was mostly assigned to Commercial agenda. The judge mostly issued judgements in Commercial agenda.

The judge worked 1531 days in the period and was assigned on average 68 cases per 100 days in main agendas.

Evaluation

In 2017, the judge received in total 7 from 40 possible points and ranked on 643. place of 651 evaluated judges.

  • Quality – 3 out of 15 points
  • Effectivity – 4 out of 25 points

Chart Comparison

Legend
Additional Judges
Select other judges for comparison:
Advanced Comparison
The chart is most useful for comparisons of judges at the same or similar courts, and those who decide cases in the same or similar agenda. Specific courts and agendas have an impact on the overall performance of judges. Simply put, commercial judge from Bratislava and criminal judge from Rožňava decide uncomparable cases.

Quality Indicators

The judge's judgements were on appeal affirmed in 55.9% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 66.5%.

  • Number of Appellate Decisions – 136
  • Number of Affirmed Decisions – 76

An appeal against the judge's judgements is filed in 8% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 8.5%.

Of the total number of the judge's judgements 3.5% is changed or reversed. The average in the same agenda is 2.8%.

Effectivity Indicators

Estimated average length of proceedings is 852.1 days. The average at the end of 2017 was 340.8 days.

The judge had 607 unresolved cases at the end of 2017. The average was 192.7 cases.

The judge had 379 restant cases at the end of 2017. The average was 111.7. This represents 62.4% of the judge's unresolved cases. Average was 54.1%.

In 2017, the judge was able to resolve 86.7% of assigned cases. Average was 141.8%.

Indicators for 2015

Number of Constitutional Court decisions against the judge:

  • Issued – 4
  • Delays prior to case assignment – 4

The judge was mostly assigned to Commercial agenda. The judge mostly issued judgements in Commercial agenda.

The judge worked 1095 days in the period and was assigned on average 44 cases per 100 days in main agendas.

Evaluation

In 2015, the judge received in total 8 from 40 possible points and ranked on 724 – 727. place of 738 evaluated judges.

  • Quality – 4.5 out of 15 points
  • Effectivity – 3.5 out of 25 points

Chart Comparison

Legend
Additional Judges
Select other judges for comparison:
Advanced Comparison
The chart is most useful for comparisons of judges at the same or similar courts, and those who decide cases in the same or similar agenda. Specific courts and agendas have an impact on the overall performance of judges. Simply put, commercial judge from Bratislava and criminal judge from Rožňava decide uncomparable cases.

Quality Indicators

The judge's judgements were on appeal affirmed in 55% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 64.9%.

  • Number of Appellate Decisions – 109
  • Number of Affirmed Decisions – 60

An appeal against the judge's judgements is filed in 9.1% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 8.8%.

Of the total number of the judge's judgements 4.1% is changed or reversed. The average in the same agenda is 3%.

Effectivity Indicators

Estimated average length of proceedings is 976 days. The average at the end of 2015 was 339 days.

The judge had 449 unresolved cases at the end of 2015. The average was 377 cases.

The judge had 254 restant cases at the end of 2015. The average was 150. This represents 56.6% of the judge's unresolved cases. Average was 42.6%.

In 2015, the judge was able to resolve 80.8% of assigned cases. Average was 97.1%.

Indicators for 2013

The number of Constitutional court judgements against the judges – issued 3 and delays prior to case assignment 3.

For the judge we register performance data for years 2011 – 2013:

Sudcovi bola prideľovaná najmä Obchodná agenda. Sudca rozhodoval najmä v Obchodnej agende.

The judge in this period worked 666 days and on average was assigned 101 cases in 10 days in main agendas.

Chart Comparison

Legend
Additional Judges
Select other judges for comparison:
Advanced Comparison
The chart is most useful for comparisons of judges at the same or similar courts, and those who decide cases in the same or similar agenda. Specific courts and agendas have an impact on the overall performance of judges. Simply put, commercial judge from Bratislava and criminal judge from Rožňava decide uncomparable cases.

Quality indicators

Rozhodnutie sudcu bolo v prípade odvolania potvrdené v 48,8% prípadoch, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 63,7%.

  • Number of appellate judgements – 82
  • Number of confirmed judgements – 40

Odvolanie proti rozhodnutiam sudcu je podávané v približne 9,9% prípadoch, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 9,7%.

Z celkového počtu rozhodnutí sudcu je zmenených alebo zrušených 5,1%, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 3,4%.

Efficiency indicators

Odhadovaná priemerná dĺžka konania sporu je 814 dní. Priemer bol na konci roka 346 dní.

Sudca mal na konci roka 2013 nevybavených 522 prípadov. Priemer bol 238.

Sudca mal na konci roka 342 reštančných vecí, pričom priemer je 126. To u sudcu tvorí 61,1% z nevybavených vecí. Priemer je 43,4.

Sudca dokázal v roku 2013 vybaviť, k počtu pridelených vecí, 97,9% prípadov. Priemer bol 99,6%.

Sudca získal podľa našej metodológie celkovo 7,25 bodov. Spomedzi 739 hodnotených sudcov sa umiestnil na 731 – 732. mieste. Za kvalitu získal 3,75 z 15 možných bodov, za efektivitu 3,5 z 25.

Notes

obtained from annual statistical reports of judges pertaining to indicators.

  • 2013 – Seminár – 4
  • 2012 – Seminár – 4; 2013 – Seminár – 4
  • 2012 – Seminár – 4

Published judgements

  1. Rozsudok – Incidenčné spory
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  2. Uznesenie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  3. Uznesenie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  4. Rozsudok – Obchodné záväzkové vzťahy
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  5. Uznesenie – Ostatné
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  6. Opravné uznesenie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  7. Rozsudok – Obchodné záväzkové vzťahy
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  8. Rozsudok – Ostatné
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  9. Uznesenie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  10. Uznesenie – Obchodné záväzkové vzťahy
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

More judgements

Upcoming hearings

We do not register any upcoming hearings for the judge yet.

Past hearings

  1. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, o určenie popretej pohľadávky… Hearing was held on

  2. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, o určenie neúčinnosti… Hearing was held on

  3. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, o zaplat. 2.662.699,54 Eur s… Hearing was held on

  4. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, o zaplat. 165.077,68 Eur s… Hearing was held on

  5. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, o zaplat. 235.874,87 Eur Hearing was held on

  6. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, vylučovacia žaloba Hearing was held on

  7. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, o určenie neúčinnosti… Hearing was held on

  8. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, o určenie neúčinnosti… Hearing was held on

  9. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, o zaplat. 189,51 Eur s prísl. Hearing was held on

  10. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, o určenie neúčinnosti Zmluvy… Hearing was held on

More hearings

Information regarding the court were obtained from the judge list, which was most recently updated on . The information may have been additionally supplemented by the data retrieved from property declarations and statistical reports.