Mgr. Adriana Halajová

  1. Active judge at the court Okresný súd Nitra, we register 3,355 hearings and 1,699 judgements.
  1. The judge has been nominated to function for more than 23 years, bez časového obmedzenia funkcie.
  2. The judge has been nominated to function for more than 27 years, 4 - ročný mandát.

obtained from annual statistical reports of judges.

Indicators for 2021

We do not register any indicators for the judge yet.

Indicators for 2017

Number of Constitutional Court decisions against the judge:

  • Issued – 2
  • Delays prior to case assignment – 0

The judge was mostly assigned to Civil agenda. The judge mostly issued judgements in Civil agenda.

The judge worked 1275 days in the period and was assigned on average 18 cases per 100 days in main agendas.

Evaluation

In 2017, the judge received in total 25.5 from 40 possible points and ranked on 133 – 155. place of 651 evaluated judges.

  • Quality – 12 out of 15 points
  • Effectivity – 13.5 out of 25 points

Chart Comparison

The chart is most useful for comparisons of judges at the same or similar courts, and those who decide cases in the same or similar agenda. Specific courts and agendas have an impact on the overall performance of judges. Simply put, commercial judge from Bratislava and criminal judge from Rožňava decide uncomparable cases.

Quality Indicators

The judge's judgements were on appeal affirmed in 79.5% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 68.7%.

  • Number of Appellate Decisions – 307
  • Number of Affirmed Decisions – 244

An appeal against the judge's judgements is filed in 12.6% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 10.1%.

Of the total number of the judge's judgements 2.6% is changed or reversed. The average in the same agenda is 3.1%.

Effectivity Indicators

Estimated average length of proceedings is 373.2 days. The average at the end of 2017 was 340.8 days.

The judge had 319 unresolved cases at the end of 2017. The average was 192.7 cases.

The judge had 230 restant cases at the end of 2017. The average was 111.7. This represents 72.1% of the judge's unresolved cases. Average was 54.1%.

In 2017, the judge was able to resolve 198.7% of assigned cases. Average was 141.8%.

Indicators for 2015

Number of Constitutional Court decisions against the judge:

  • Issued – 0
  • Delays prior to case assignment – 0

The judge was mostly assigned to Civil agenda. The judge mostly issued judgements in Civil agenda.

The judge worked 1042 days in the period and was assigned on average 19 cases per 100 days in main agendas.

Evaluation

In 2015, the judge received in total 23.5 from 40 possible points and ranked on 286 – 303. place of 738 evaluated judges.

  • Quality – 12 out of 15 points
  • Effectivity – 11.5 out of 25 points

Chart Comparison

The chart is most useful for comparisons of judges at the same or similar courts, and those who decide cases in the same or similar agenda. Specific courts and agendas have an impact on the overall performance of judges. Simply put, commercial judge from Bratislava and criminal judge from Rožňava decide uncomparable cases.

Quality Indicators

The judge's judgements were on appeal affirmed in 81.5% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 67.1%.

  • Number of Appellate Decisions – 286
  • Number of Affirmed Decisions – 233

An appeal against the judge's judgements is filed in 15.1% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 9.3%.

Of the total number of the judge's judgements 2.8% is changed or reversed. The average in the same agenda is 3%.

Effectivity Indicators

Estimated average length of proceedings is 368 days. The average at the end of 2015 was 339 days.

The judge had 634 unresolved cases at the end of 2015. The average was 377 cases.

The judge had 205 restant cases at the end of 2015. The average was 150. This represents 32.3% of the judge's unresolved cases. Average was 42.6%.

In 2015, the judge was able to resolve 87.6% of assigned cases. Average was 97.1%.

Indicators for 2013

The number of Constitutional court judgements against the judges – issued 0 and delays prior to case assignment 0.

For the judge we register performance data for years 2011 – 2013:

Sudcovi bola prideľovaná najmä Občiansko–právna agenda. Sudca rozhodoval najmä v Občiansko–právnej agende.

The judge in this period worked 624 days and on average was assigned 156 cases in 10 days in main agendas.

Chart Comparison

The chart is most useful for comparisons of judges at the same or similar courts, and those who decide cases in the same or similar agenda. Specific courts and agendas have an impact on the overall performance of judges. Simply put, commercial judge from Bratislava and criminal judge from Rožňava decide uncomparable cases.

Quality indicators

Rozhodnutie sudcu bolo v prípade odvolania potvrdené v 67,9% prípadoch, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 62,9%.

  • Number of appellate judgements – 84
  • Number of confirmed judgements – 57

Odvolanie proti rozhodnutiam sudcu je podávané v približne 8,6% prípadoch, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 8,9%.

Z celkového počtu rozhodnutí sudcu je zmenených alebo zrušených 2,8%, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 3,3%.

Efficiency indicators

Odhadovaná priemerná dĺžka konania sporu je 341 dní. Priemer bol na konci roka 346 dní.

Sudca mal na konci roka 2013 nevybavených 337 prípadov. Priemer bol 238.

Sudca mal na konci roka 191 reštančných vecí, pričom priemer je 126. To u sudcu tvorí 45,4% z nevybavených vecí. Priemer je 43,4.

Sudca dokázal v roku 2013 vybaviť, k počtu pridelených vecí, 112,1% prípadov. Priemer bol 99,6%.

Sudca získal podľa našej metodológie celkovo 20,25 bodov. Spomedzi 739 hodnotených sudcov sa umiestnil na 416 – 430. mieste. Za kvalitu získal 8,75 z 15 možných bodov, za efektivitu 11,5 z 25.

Notes

obtained from annual statistical reports of judges pertaining to indicators.

  • 2013 – Sudca sa zúčastnil na vzdelávacích aktivitách 1x.
  • 2013 – Nebol dôvod na zníženie nápadu.
  • 2012 – Sudca sa nezúčastnil žiadnych vzdelávacích aktivít.
  • 2012 – Nebol dôvod na zníženie nápadu.
  • 2011 – Sudca sa nezúčastnil žiadnych vzdelávacích aktivít.; 2012 – Sudca sa nezúčastnil žiadnych vzdelávacích aktivít.; 2013 – Sudca sa zúčastnil na vzdelávacích aktivitách 1x.
  • 2011 – Sudca sa nezúčastnil žiadnych vzdelávacích aktivít.
  • 2011 – Nebol dôvod na zníženie nápadu.; 2012 – Nebol dôvod na zníženie nápadu.; 2013 – Nebol dôvod na zníženie nápadu.
  • 2011 – Nebol dôvod na zníženie nápadu.

Published judgements

  1. Uznesenie – Ostatné
    Iná povaha rozhodnutia
    Judgement was issued on

  2. Rozhodnutie – Zmluvy
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  3. Rozhodnutie – Spotrebiteľské zmluvy
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  4. Rozhodnutie – Ostatné
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  5. Rozhodnutie – Ostatné
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  6. Rozhodnutie – Spotrebiteľské zmluvy
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  7. Uznesenie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  8. Rozhodnutie – Zmluvy
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  9. Rozhodnutie – Ostatné
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  10. Rozhodnutie – Ostatné
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

More judgements

Upcoming hearings

We do not register any upcoming hearings for the judge yet.

Past hearings

  1. Verejné vyhlásenie rozsudku, zaplatenie sumy 747,20 EUR s… Hearing was held on

  2. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, náhrada škody na zdraví Hearing was held on

  3. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, Vysporiadanie BSM po rozvode Hearing was held on

  4. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, zaplatenie sumy 1.134,57 EUR… Hearing was held on

  5. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, určenie neplatnosti dohody o… Hearing was held on

  6. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, zaplatenie sumy 16.333,- € s… Hearing was held on

  7. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, zaplatenie sumy 1.699,3 EUR s… Hearing was held on

  8. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, náhradu škody Hearing was held on

  9. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, Zrušenie výživného na… Hearing was held on

  10. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, zrušenie rozhodcovského… Hearing was held on

More hearings

Information regarding the court were obtained from the judge list, which was most recently updated on . The information may have been additionally supplemented by the data retrieved from property declarations and statistical reports.