JUDr. Júlia Henteková

  1. Active judge at the court Okresný súd Komárno, we register 2,674 hearings and 1,845 judgements.

obtained from annual statistical reports of judges.

Indicators for 2021

We do not register any indicators for the judge yet.

Indicators for 2017

We do not register any indicators for the judge yet.

Indicators for 2015

Number of Constitutional Court decisions against the judge:

  • Issued – 0
  • Delays prior to case assignment – 0

The judge was mostly assigned to Civil agenda. The judge mostly issued judgements in Civil agenda.

The judge worked 983 days in the period and was assigned on average 48 cases per 100 days in main agendas.

Evaluation

In 2015, the judge received in total 15 from 40 possible points and ranked on 623 – 638. place of 738 evaluated judges.

  • Quality – 9 out of 15 points
  • Effectivity – 6 out of 25 points

Chart Comparison

Legend
Advanced Comparison
The chart is most useful for comparisons of judges at the same or similar courts, and those who decide cases in the same or similar agenda. Specific courts and agendas have an impact on the overall performance of judges. Simply put, commercial judge from Bratislava and criminal judge from Rožňava decide uncomparable cases.

Quality Indicators

The judge's judgements were on appeal affirmed in 70.9% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 67.1%.

  • Number of Appellate Decisions – 134
  • Number of Affirmed Decisions – 95

An appeal against the judge's judgements is filed in 6.1% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 9.3%.

Of the total number of the judge's judgements 1.8% is changed or reversed. The average in the same agenda is 3%.

Effectivity Indicators

Estimated average length of proceedings is 534 days. The average at the end of 2015 was 339 days.

The judge had 831 unresolved cases at the end of 2015. The average was 377 cases.

The judge had 319 restant cases at the end of 2015. The average was 150. This represents 38.4% of the judge's unresolved cases. Average was 42.6%.

In 2015, the judge was able to resolve 76.1% of assigned cases. Average was 97.1%.

Indicators for 2013

The number of Constitutional court judgements against the judges – issued 0 and delays prior to case assignment 0.

For the judge we register performance data for years 2011 – 2013:

Sudcovi bola prideľovaná najmä Občiansko–právna agenda. Sudca rozhodoval najmä v Občiansko–právnej agende.

The judge in this period worked 624 days and on average was assigned 217 cases in 10 days in main agendas.

Chart Comparison

Legend
Advanced Comparison
The chart is most useful for comparisons of judges at the same or similar courts, and those who decide cases in the same or similar agenda. Specific courts and agendas have an impact on the overall performance of judges. Simply put, commercial judge from Bratislava and criminal judge from Rožňava decide uncomparable cases.

Quality indicators

Rozhodnutie sudcu bolo v prípade odvolania potvrdené v 52,4% prípadoch, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 62,9%.

  • Number of appellate judgements – 42
  • Number of confirmed judgements – 22

Odvolanie proti rozhodnutiam sudcu je podávané v približne 3,3% prípadoch, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 8,9%.

Z celkového počtu rozhodnutí sudcu je zmenených alebo zrušených 1,6%, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 3,3%.

Efficiency indicators

Odhadovaná priemerná dĺžka konania sporu je 289 dní. Priemer bol na konci roka 346 dní.

Sudca mal na konci roka 2013 nevybavených 322 prípadov. Priemer bol 238.

Sudca mal na konci roka 127 reštančných vecí, pričom priemer je 126. To u sudcu tvorí 38,1% z nevybavených vecí. Priemer je 43,4.

Sudca dokázal v roku 2013 vybaviť, k počtu pridelených vecí, 92,3% prípadov. Priemer bol 99,6%.

Sudca získal podľa našej metodológie celkovo 19,75 bodov. Spomedzi 739 hodnotených sudcov sa umiestnil na 438 – 457. mieste. Za kvalitu získal 7 z 15 možných bodov, za efektivitu 12,75 z 25.

Notes

obtained from annual statistical reports of judges pertaining to indicators.

  • 2013 – Sudkyňa sa nezúčastnila žiadnych aktivít.
  • 2013 – Nebol dôvod na zníženie nápadu. Podľa rozvrhu práce v dôsledku výrazne zvýšeného nápadu vecí v agende C bol pomer pridelených vecí viackrát zmenený :z nápadu 1/6 na 5/31 a potom od 22.10. 2013 na 1/35, agenda Cpr bola prideľovaná v 1/6–ine potom v 1/7–ine, agenda Ro v 1/6–ine a od 22.3. 2013 v 1/35–ine a agenda Er v 1/9–ine a od 22.03.2013 v 1/10–ine.
  • 2012 – Sudkyňa sa nezúčastnila žiadnych vzdelávacích aktivít.; 2013 – Sudkyňa sa nezúčastnila žiadnych aktivít.
  • 2012 – Sudkyňa sa nezúčastnila žiadnych vzdelávacích aktivít.
  • 2012 – Nebol dôvod na zníženie nápadu.Sudkyni agenda P podľa rozvrhu práce bola prideľovaná v l/4–ine, agenda C v 1/19–ine , agenda Ro v 1/19–ine, D v 1/4–ine a Er v 1/9–ine. ; 2013 – Nebol dôvod na zníženie nápadu. Podľa rozvrhu práce v dôsledku výrazne zvýšeného nápadu vecí v agende C bol pomer pridelených vecí viackrát zmenený :z nápadu 1/6 na 5/31 a potom od 22.10. 2013 na 1/35, agenda Cpr bola prideľovaná v 1/6–ine potom v 1/7–ine, agenda Ro v 1/6–ine a od 22.3. 2013 v 1/35–ine a agenda Er v 1/9–ine a od 22.03.2013 v 1/10–ine.
  • 2012 – Nebol dôvod na zníženie nápadu.Sudkyni agenda P podľa rozvrhu práce bola prideľovaná v l/4–ine, agenda C v 1/19–ine , agenda Ro v 1/19–ine, D v 1/4–ine a Er v 1/9–ine.

Published judgements

  1. Rozsudok – Poistenie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  2. Rozsudok – Ostatné
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  3. Uznesenie
    Iná povaha rozhodnutia
    Judgement was issued on

  4. Uznesenie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  5. Uznesenie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  6. Uznesenie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  7. Platobný rozkaz – Ostatné
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  8. Uznesenie – Exekúcia a výkon rozhodnutí
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  9. Uznesenie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  10. Platobný rozkaz – Ostatné
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

More judgements

Upcoming hearings

We do not register any upcoming hearings for the judge yet.

Past hearings

  1. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, zaplatenie 774 € s prísl . Hearing was held on

  2. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, zaplatenie 146.749,90 Kč s… Hearing was held on

  3. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, zaplatenie 3.403,66 € s prísl. Hearing was held on

  4. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, zaplatenie 751,77 € s prísl. Hearing was held on

  5. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, zaplatenie 465,72 € s prísl . Hearing was held on

  6. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, zaplatenie 2 327,58€ s prísl . Hearing was held on

  7. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, zaplatenie 1.481,- € s prísl. Hearing was held on

  8. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, zaplatenie sumy 9.728,34 € s… Hearing was held on

  9. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, náhrada škody a vydanie… Hearing was held on

  10. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, zaplatenie 247,85 € s prísl. Hearing was held on

More hearings

Information regarding the court were obtained from the judge list, which was most recently updated on . The information may have been additionally supplemented by the data retrieved from property declarations and statistical reports.