Close persons acknowledged in property declarations in years 2014.
Close persons acknowledged in property declaration in a year 2014:
Notes about the data obtained from annual statistical reports of judges.
Overall evaluation of the judge is average.
Incoming cases for the judge in 2021 were mostly from criminal agenda. Judge's decrees in 2021 were mostly from criminal agenda.
We register 62.97% decrees for the judge, which are confirmed by the higher court in case of an appeal. The median amongst judges is 68,9%.
We register 424 decrees concerning appeals.
In this dimension the judge belongs to the group that is worse than average.
The judge had overal appointment of cases of 107.19% in 2021. The median amongst judges is 107,9%.
Anticipated time of the judge was based on data from 2021 122 days. Median amongst judges was 224,3 days.
In 2021 the judge decided 298 cases in the observed agendas.
In this dimension the judge belongs to the group that is average.
Weighted product of the judge in 2021 was 324.3. Median amongst judges was 248,1.
For the judge we register 95 unresolved cases at the end of 2021. From those 29.47% are restant cases. Median amongst judges was 39,34% of restant cases from the total number of unresolved cases.
In this dimension the judge belongs to the group that is better than average.
Number of Constitutional Court decisions against the judge:
The judge was mostly assigned to Family Agenda. The judge mostly issued judgements in Family Agenda.
The judge worked 1529 days in the period and was assigned on average 119 cases per 100 days in main agendas.
In 2017, the judge received in total 22 from 40 possible points and ranked on 285 – 316. place of 651 evaluated judges.
The judge's judgements were on appeal affirmed in 62.9% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 67.8%.
An appeal against the judge's judgements is filed in 11.8% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 7.9%.
Of the total number of the judge's judgements 4.4% is changed or reversed. The average in the same agenda is 2.5%.
Estimated average length of proceedings is 108.4 days. The average at the end of 2017 was 340.8 days.
The judge had 142 unresolved cases at the end of 2017. The average was 192.7 cases.
The judge had 43 restant cases at the end of 2017. The average was 111.7. This represents 30.3% of the judge's unresolved cases. Average was 54.1%.
In 2017, the judge was able to resolve 97% of assigned cases. Average was 141.8%.
Number of Constitutional Court decisions against the judge:
The judge was mostly assigned to Family Agenda. The judge mostly issued judgements in Family Agenda.
The judge worked 1088 days in the period and was assigned on average 82 cases per 100 days in main agendas.
In 2015, the judge received in total 26.5 from 40 possible points and ranked on 153 – 167. place of 738 evaluated judges.
The judge's judgements were on appeal affirmed in 64.6% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 67.3%.
An appeal against the judge's judgements is filed in 12.4% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 7.6%.
Of the total number of the judge's judgements 4.4% is changed or reversed. The average in the same agenda is 2.5%.
Estimated average length of proceedings is 112 days. The average at the end of 2015 was 339 days.
The judge had 112 unresolved cases at the end of 2015. The average was 377 cases.
The judge had 28 restant cases at the end of 2015. The average was 150. This represents 25% of the judge's unresolved cases. Average was 42.6%.
In 2015, the judge was able to resolve 104% of assigned cases. Average was 97.1%.
The number of Constitutional court judgements against the judges – issued 0 and delays prior to case assignment 0.
For the judge we register performance data for years 2011 – 2013:
Sudcovi bola prideľovaná najmä agenda Starostlivosti o maloletých. Sudca rozhodoval najmä v agende Starostlivosti o maloletých.
The judge in this period worked 662 days and on average was assigned 147 cases in 10 days in main agendas.
Rozhodnutie sudcu bolo v prípade odvolania potvrdené v 59% prípadoch, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 65,5%.
Odvolanie proti rozhodnutiam sudcu je podávané v približne 10,7% prípadoch, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 7,2%.
Z celkového počtu rozhodnutí sudcu je zmenených alebo zrušených 4,4%, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 2,5%.
Odhadovaná priemerná dĺžka konania sporu je 67 dní. Priemer bol na konci roka 346 dní.
Sudca mal na konci roka 2013 nevybavených 61 prípadov. Priemer bol 238.
Sudca mal na konci roka 21 reštančných vecí, pričom priemer je 126. To u sudcu tvorí 21,9% z nevybavených vecí. Priemer je 43,4.
Sudca dokázal v roku 2013 vybaviť, k počtu pridelených vecí, 99,4% prípadov. Priemer bol 99,6%.
Sudca získal podľa našej metodológie celkovo 25,25 bodov. Spomedzi 739 hodnotených sudcov sa umiestnil na 154 – 163. mieste. Za kvalitu získal 5,25 z 15 možných bodov, za efektivitu 20 z 25.
Notes about the data obtained from annual statistical reports of judges pertaining to indicators.
We do not register any upcoming hearings for the judge yet.
Information regarding the court were obtained from the judge list, which was most recently updated on . The information may have been additionally supplemented by the data retrieved from property declarations and statistical reports.