JUDr. Peter Banský

  1. Active judge at the court Okresný súd Zvolen, we register 3,512 hearings and 3,857 judgements.

obtained from annual statistical reports of judges.

Indicators for 2021

Overall evaluation of the judge is low.
Incoming cases for the judge in 2021 were mostly from civil agenda. Judge's decrees in 2021 were mostly from civil agenda.

Component – Quality

We register 62.84% decrees for the judge, which are confirmed by the higher court in case of an appeal. The median amongst judges is 68,9%. We register 261 decrees concerning appeals.
In this dimension the judge belongs to the group that is worse than average.

Component – Effectivity

The judge had overal appointment of cases of 91.67% in 2021. The median amongst judges is 107,9%.
Anticipated time of the judge was based on data from 2021 247 days. Median amongst judges was 224,3 days.
In 2021 the judge decided 253 cases in the observed agendas.
In this dimension the judge belongs to the group that is worse than average.

Component – Productivity

Weighted product of the judge in 2021 was 243.82. Median amongst judges was 248,1.
For the judge we register 180 unresolved cases at the end of 2021. From those 26.67% are restant cases. Median amongst judges was 39,34% of restant cases from the total number of unresolved cases.
In this dimension the judge belongs to the group that is average.

Overall Evaluation
Evaluation on a scale from 0 to 10.

Indicators for 2017

Number of Constitutional Court decisions against the judge:

  • Issued – 0
  • Delays prior to case assignment – 0

The judge was mostly assigned to Civil agenda. The judge mostly issued judgements in Civil agenda.

The judge worked 1458 days in the period and was assigned on average 37 cases per 100 days in main agendas.

Evaluation

In 2017, the judge received in total 20.5 from 40 possible points and ranked on 369 – 388. place of 651 evaluated judges.

  • Quality – 6 out of 15 points
  • Effectivity – 14.5 out of 25 points

Chart Comparison

Legend
Advanced Comparison
The chart is most useful for comparisons of judges at the same or similar courts, and those who decide cases in the same or similar agenda. Specific courts and agendas have an impact on the overall performance of judges. Simply put, commercial judge from Bratislava and criminal judge from Rožňava decide uncomparable cases.

Quality Indicators

The judge's judgements were on appeal affirmed in 64.5% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 68.7%.

  • Number of Appellate Decisions – 155
  • Number of Affirmed Decisions – 100

An appeal against the judge's judgements is filed in 6.2% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 10.1%.

Of the total number of the judge's judgements 2.2% is changed or reversed. The average in the same agenda is 3.1%.

Effectivity Indicators

Estimated average length of proceedings is 285 days. The average at the end of 2017 was 340.8 days.

The judge had 178 unresolved cases at the end of 2017. The average was 192.7 cases.

The judge had 92 restant cases at the end of 2017. The average was 111.7. This represents 51.7% of the judge's unresolved cases. Average was 54.1%.

In 2017, the judge was able to resolve 166.4% of assigned cases. Average was 141.8%.

Indicators for 2015

Number of Constitutional Court decisions against the judge:

  • Issued – 0
  • Delays prior to case assignment – 0

The judge was mostly assigned to Civil agenda. The judge mostly issued judgements in Civil agenda.

The judge worked 1040 days in the period and was assigned on average 33 cases per 100 days in main agendas.

Evaluation

In 2015, the judge received in total 16.5 from 40 possible points and ranked on 576 – 590. place of 738 evaluated judges.

  • Quality – 6 out of 15 points
  • Effectivity – 10.5 out of 25 points

Chart Comparison

Legend
Advanced Comparison
The chart is most useful for comparisons of judges at the same or similar courts, and those who decide cases in the same or similar agenda. Specific courts and agendas have an impact on the overall performance of judges. Simply put, commercial judge from Bratislava and criminal judge from Rožňava decide uncomparable cases.

Quality Indicators

The judge's judgements were on appeal affirmed in 58.6% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 67.1%.

  • Number of Appellate Decisions – 99
  • Number of Affirmed Decisions – 58

An appeal against the judge's judgements is filed in 5.4% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 9.3%.

Of the total number of the judge's judgements 2.3% is changed or reversed. The average in the same agenda is 3%.

Effectivity Indicators

Estimated average length of proceedings is 426 days. The average at the end of 2015 was 339 days.

The judge had 640 unresolved cases at the end of 2015. The average was 377 cases.

The judge had 267 restant cases at the end of 2015. The average was 150. This represents 41.7% of the judge's unresolved cases. Average was 42.6%.

In 2015, the judge was able to resolve 98.4% of assigned cases. Average was 97.1%.

Indicators for 2013

The number of Constitutional court judgements against the judges – issued 0 and delays prior to case assignment 0.

For the judge we register performance data for years 2011 – 2013:

Sudcovi bola prideľovaná najmä Občiansko–právna agenda. Sudca rozhodoval najmä v Občiansko–právnej agende.

The judge in this period worked 609 days and on average was assigned 170 cases in 10 days in main agendas.

Chart Comparison

Legend
Advanced Comparison
The chart is most useful for comparisons of judges at the same or similar courts, and those who decide cases in the same or similar agenda. Specific courts and agendas have an impact on the overall performance of judges. Simply put, commercial judge from Bratislava and criminal judge from Rožňava decide uncomparable cases.

Quality indicators

Rozhodnutie sudcu bolo v prípade odvolania potvrdené v 72,7% prípadoch, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 62,9%.

  • Number of appellate judgements – 44
  • Number of confirmed judgements – 32

Odvolanie proti rozhodnutiam sudcu je podávané v približne 4,4% prípadoch, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 8,9%.

Z celkového počtu rozhodnutí sudcu je zmenených alebo zrušených 1,2%, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 3,3%.

Efficiency indicators

Odhadovaná priemerná dĺžka konania sporu je 238 dní. Priemer bol na konci roka 346 dní.

Sudca mal na konci roka 2013 nevybavených 309 prípadov. Priemer bol 238.

Sudca mal na konci roka 225 reštančných vecí, pričom priemer je 126. To u sudcu tvorí 58,7% z nevybavených vecí. Priemer je 43,4.

Sudca dokázal v roku 2013 vybaviť, k počtu pridelených vecí, 149,2% prípadov. Priemer bol 99,6%.

Sudca získal podľa našej metodológie celkovo 23,5 bodov. Spomedzi 739 hodnotených sudcov sa umiestnil na 233 – 240. mieste. Za kvalitu získal 11 z 15 možných bodov, za efektivitu 12,5 z 25.

Notes

obtained from annual statistical reports of judges pertaining to indicators.

  • 2013 – 17. 10. – 18. 10. 2013 Pracovné stretnutie OPK banskobystrického kraja, Omšenie;
  • 2012 – 26. – 27. 04. 2012 – pracovné stretnutie sudcov obvodu Krajského súdu v Banskej Bystrici, 21. – 22. 05. 2012 – pracovné stretnutie sudcov Okresného súdu Zvolen, 18. – 19. 06. 2012 – spory o vlastnícke právo k nehnuteľnostiam a kataster nehnuteľností, 17. 09. 2012 – pracovné stretnutie obchodno–právneho kolégia
  • 2011 – Účasť na zasadnutí občianskoprávneho kolégia – 2 dni; 2012 – 26. – 27. 04. 2012 – pracovné stretnutie sudcov obvodu Krajského súdu v Banskej Bystrici, 21. – 22. 05. 2012 – pracovné stretnutie sudcov Okresného súdu Zvolen, 18. – 19. 06. 2012 – spory o vlastnícke právo k nehnuteľnostiam a kataster nehnuteľností, 17. 09. 2012 – pracovné stretnutie obchodno–právneho kolégia; 2013 – 17. 10. – 18. 10. 2013 Pracovné stretnutie OPK banskobystrického kraja, Omšenie;
  • 2011 – Účasť na zasadnutí občianskoprávneho kolégia – 2 dni
  • 2011 – –––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––; 2013 – –––
  • 2011 – –––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––

Published judgements

  1. Rozsudok – Rozvod
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  2. Uznesenie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  3. Uznesenie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  4. Rozsudok – Rozvod
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  5. Rozsudok – Starostlivosť o maloletých
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  6. Rozsudok – Rozvod
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  7. Rozsudok – Výchovné opatrenia
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  8. Rozsudok – Schválenie právneho úkonu
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  9. Uznesenie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  10. Uznesenie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

More judgements

Upcoming hearings

We do not register any upcoming hearings for the judge yet.

Past hearings

  1. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, zmena úpravy výkonu… Hearing was held on

  2. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, zverenie maloletých detí do… Hearing was held on

  3. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, úprava rodičovských práv a… Hearing was held on

  4. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, nariadenie výchovného opatrenia Hearing was held on

  5. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, vydanie neodkladného opatrenia Hearing was held on

  6. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, určenie výživného na maloleté… Hearing was held on

  7. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, zvýšenie výživného Hearing was held on

  8. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, rozvod manželstva a úprava práv… Hearing was held on

  9. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, priznanie rodičovských práv… Hearing was held on

  10. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, rozvod manželstva a úprava… Hearing was held on

More hearings

Information regarding the court were obtained from the judge list, which was most recently updated on . The information may have been additionally supplemented by the data retrieved from property declarations and statistical reports.