Mgr. Andrej Kekely

  1. Active judge at the court Krajský súd Žilina, we register 272 hearings and 167 judgements.
  2. Inactive judge at the court Okresný súd Žilina, we register 2,563 hearings and 2,023 judgements.
  1. The judge has been nominated to function for about 17 years.

Indicators for 2021

We do not register any indicators for the judge yet.

Indicators for 2017

Number of Constitutional Court decisions against the judge:

  • Issued – 13
  • Delays prior to case assignment – 9

The judge was mostly assigned to Civil agenda. The judge mostly issued judgements in Civil agenda.

The judge worked 1544 days in the period and was assigned on average 15 cases per 100 days in main agendas.

Evaluation

In 2017, the judge received in total 28.5 from 40 possible points and ranked on 49 – 61. place of 651 evaluated judges.

  • Quality – 12 out of 15 points
  • Effectivity – 16.5 out of 25 points

Chart Comparison

Legend
Advanced Comparison
The chart is most useful for comparisons of judges at the same or similar courts, and those who decide cases in the same or similar agenda. Specific courts and agendas have an impact on the overall performance of judges. Simply put, commercial judge from Bratislava and criminal judge from Rožňava decide uncomparable cases.

Quality Indicators

The judge's judgements were on appeal affirmed in 81.6% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 68.7%.

  • Number of Appellate Decisions – 315
  • Number of Affirmed Decisions – 257

An appeal against the judge's judgements is filed in 11.7% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 10.1%.

Of the total number of the judge's judgements 2.2% is changed or reversed. The average in the same agenda is 3.1%.

Effectivity Indicators

Estimated average length of proceedings is 293.9 days. The average at the end of 2017 was 340.8 days.

The judge had 190 unresolved cases at the end of 2017. The average was 192.7 cases.

The judge had 135 restant cases at the end of 2017. The average was 111.7. This represents 71.1% of the judge's unresolved cases. Average was 54.1%.

In 2017, the judge was able to resolve 218.5% of assigned cases. Average was 141.8%.

Indicators for 2015

Number of Constitutional Court decisions against the judge:

  • Issued – 11
  • Delays prior to case assignment – 7

The judge was mostly assigned to Civil agenda. The judge mostly issued judgements in Civil agenda.

The judge worked 1103 days in the period and was assigned on average 18 cases per 100 days in main agendas.

Evaluation

In 2015, the judge received in total 25.5 from 40 possible points and ranked on 194 – 213. place of 738 evaluated judges.

  • Quality – 12 out of 15 points
  • Effectivity – 13.5 out of 25 points

Chart Comparison

Legend
Advanced Comparison
The chart is most useful for comparisons of judges at the same or similar courts, and those who decide cases in the same or similar agenda. Specific courts and agendas have an impact on the overall performance of judges. Simply put, commercial judge from Bratislava and criminal judge from Rožňava decide uncomparable cases.

Quality Indicators

The judge's judgements were on appeal affirmed in 81.6% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 67.1%.

  • Number of Appellate Decisions – 239
  • Number of Affirmed Decisions – 195

An appeal against the judge's judgements is filed in 11.8% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 9.3%.

Of the total number of the judge's judgements 2.2% is changed or reversed. The average in the same agenda is 3%.

Effectivity Indicators

Estimated average length of proceedings is 334 days. The average at the end of 2015 was 339 days.

The judge had 555 unresolved cases at the end of 2015. The average was 377 cases.

The judge had 224 restant cases at the end of 2015. The average was 150. This represents 40.4% of the judge's unresolved cases. Average was 42.6%.

In 2015, the judge was able to resolve 104.8% of assigned cases. Average was 97.1%.

Indicators for 2013

The number of Constitutional court judgements against the judges – issued 10 and delays prior to case assignment 6.

For the judge we register performance data for years 2011 – 2013:

Sudcovi bola prideľovaná najmä Občiansko–právna agenda. Sudca rozhodoval najmä v Občiansko–právnej agende.

The judge in this period worked 661 days and on average was assigned 157 cases in 10 days in main agendas.

Chart Comparison

Legend
Advanced Comparison
The chart is most useful for comparisons of judges at the same or similar courts, and those who decide cases in the same or similar agenda. Specific courts and agendas have an impact on the overall performance of judges. Simply put, commercial judge from Bratislava and criminal judge from Rožňava decide uncomparable cases.

Quality indicators

Rozhodnutie sudcu bolo v prípade odvolania potvrdené v 77,2% prípadoch, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 62,9%.

  • Number of appellate judgements – 92
  • Number of confirmed judgements – 71

Odvolanie proti rozhodnutiam sudcu je podávané v približne 9,2% prípadoch, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 8,9%.

Z celkového počtu rozhodnutí sudcu je zmenených alebo zrušených 2,1%, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 3,3%.

Efficiency indicators

Odhadovaná priemerná dĺžka konania sporu je 396 dní. Priemer bol na konci roka 346 dní.

Sudca mal na konci roka 2013 nevybavených 454 prípadov. Priemer bol 238.

Sudca mal na konci roka 255 reštančných vecí, pričom priemer je 126. To u sudcu tvorí 51,7% z nevybavených vecí. Priemer je 43,4.

Sudca dokázal v roku 2013 vybaviť, k počtu pridelených vecí, 119,8% prípadov. Priemer bol 99,6%.

Sudca získal podľa našej metodológie celkovo 20 bodov. Spomedzi 739 hodnotených sudcov sa umiestnil na 431 – 437. mieste. Za kvalitu získal 11,25 z 15 možných bodov, za efektivitu 8,75 z 25.

Notes

obtained from annual statistical reports of judges pertaining to indicators.

  • 2012 – sudca nemal znížený nápad
  • 2012 – sudca nemal znížený nápad
  • 2011 – 4
  • 2011 – 4

Published judgements

  1. Uznesenie – Bezpodielové spoluvlastníctvo manželov
    Potvrdzujúce
    Judgement was issued on

  2. Uznesenie – Ostatné
    Pripúštajúce spätvzatie návrhu, zrušujúce rozsudok a…
    Judgement was issued on

  3. Uznesenie – Ostatné
    Potvrdzujúce
    Judgement was issued on

  4. Rozsudok – Rozvod
    Potvrdzujúce, Zrušujúce
    Judgement was issued on

  5. Uznesenie – Ostatné
    Zrušené
    Judgement was issued on

  6. Uznesenie
    Potvrdzujúce
    Judgement was issued on

  7. Uznesenie
    Potvrdzujúce
    Judgement was issued on

  8. Uznesenie – Zmluvy
    Zrušujúce
    Judgement was issued on

  9. Uznesenie – Vyživovacie povinnosti
    Odmietajúce odvolanie
    Judgement was issued on

  10. Uznesenie – Zmluvy
    Potvrdzujúce
    Judgement was issued on

More judgements

Upcoming hearings

We do not register any upcoming hearings for the judge yet.

Past hearings

  1. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, zaplatenie 3.712,37 € s prísl. Hearing was held on

  2. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, zrušenie a vyporiadanie podiel.… Hearing was held on

  3. Verejné vyhlásenie rozsudku, zaplatenie 1.776,86 Eur s… Hearing was held on

  4. Verejné vyhlásenie rozsudku, určenie relatívnej neplatnosti… Hearing was held on

  5. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, zaplatenie sumy 1.465,78 Eur… Hearing was held on

  6. Verejné vyhlásenie rozsudku, zvýšenie výživného na plnoleté… Hearing was held on

  7. Verejné vyhlásenie rozsudku, vypratanie bytu Hearing was held on

  8. Verejné vyhlásenie rozsudku, určenie výživného Hearing was held on

  9. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, zaplatenie 1.286,88 € s prísl. Hearing was held on

  10. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, zrušenie a vyporiadanie podiel.… Hearing was held on

More hearings

Information regarding the court were obtained from the judge list, which was most recently updated on . The information may have been additionally supplemented by the data retrieved from property declarations and statistical reports.