Notes about the data obtained from annual statistical reports of judges.
Number of Constitutional Court decisions against the judge:
The judge was mostly assigned to Civil agenda. The judge mostly issued judgements in Civil agenda.
The judge worked 1488 days in the period and was assigned on average 71 cases per 100 days in main agendas.
In 2017, the judge received in total 26.5 from 40 possible points and ranked on 99 – 112. place of 651 evaluated judges.
The judge's judgements were on appeal affirmed in 76.3% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 68.7%.
An appeal against the judge's judgements is filed in 13.8% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 10.1%.
Of the total number of the judge's judgements 3.3% is changed or reversed. The average in the same agenda is 3.1%.
Estimated average length of proceedings is 135.9 days. The average at the end of 2017 was 340.8 days.
The judge had 102 unresolved cases at the end of 2017. The average was 192.7 cases.
The judge had 62 restant cases at the end of 2017. The average was 111.7. This represents 60.8% of the judge's unresolved cases. Average was 54.1%.
In 2017, the judge was able to resolve 137% of assigned cases. Average was 141.8%.
Number of Constitutional Court decisions against the judge:
The judge was mostly assigned to Civil agenda. The judge mostly issued judgements in Civil agenda.
The judge worked 1064 days in the period and was assigned on average 57 cases per 100 days in main agendas.
In 2015, the judge received in total 28.5 from 40 possible points and ranked on 91 – 106. place of 738 evaluated judges.
The judge's judgements were on appeal affirmed in 87.3% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 67.1%.
An appeal against the judge's judgements is filed in 12.6% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 9.3%.
Of the total number of the judge's judgements 1.6% is changed or reversed. The average in the same agenda is 3%.
Estimated average length of proceedings is 234 days. The average at the end of 2015 was 339 days.
The judge had 370 unresolved cases at the end of 2015. The average was 377 cases.
The judge had 131 restant cases at the end of 2015. The average was 150. This represents 35.4% of the judge's unresolved cases. Average was 42.6%.
In 2015, the judge was able to resolve 98.8% of assigned cases. Average was 97.1%.
The number of Constitutional court judgements against the judges – issued 0 and delays prior to case assignment 0.
For the judge we register performance data for years 2011 – 2013:
Sudcovi bola prideľovaná najmä Občiansko–právna agenda. Sudca rozhodoval najmä v Občiansko–právnej agende.
The judge in this period worked 644 days and on average was assigned 193 cases in 10 days in main agendas.
Rozhodnutie sudcu bolo v prípade odvolania potvrdené v 67,3% prípadoch, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 62,9%.
Odvolanie proti rozhodnutiam sudcu je podávané v približne 4,8% prípadoch, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 8,9%.
Z celkového počtu rozhodnutí sudcu je zmenených alebo zrušených 1,6%, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 3,3%.
Odhadovaná priemerná dĺžka konania sporu je 261 dní. Priemer bol na konci roka 346 dní.
Sudca mal na konci roka 2013 nevybavených 369 prípadov. Priemer bol 238.
Sudca mal na konci roka 228 reštančných vecí, pričom priemer je 126. To u sudcu tvorí 54,4% z nevybavených vecí. Priemer je 43,4.
Sudca dokázal v roku 2013 vybaviť, k počtu pridelených vecí, 123,7% prípadov. Priemer bol 99,6%.
Sudca získal podľa našej metodológie celkovo 20,75 bodov. Spomedzi 739 hodnotených sudcov sa umiestnil na 385 – 401. mieste. Za kvalitu získal 9,75 z 15 možných bodov, za efektivitu 11 z 25.
Notes about the data obtained from annual statistical reports of judges pertaining to indicators.
Information regarding the court were obtained from the judge list, which was most recently updated on . The information may have been additionally supplemented by the data retrieved from property declarations and statistical reports.