JUDr. Zuzana Korčeková

  1. Active judge at the court Správny súd Bratislava, we register 20 hearings and no judgements.
  2. Inactive vice chairman at the court Mestský súd Bratislava II, we register 3,576 hearings and 2,816 judgements.
  1. The judge has been nominated to function for almost 19 years.

obtained from annual statistical reports of judges.

Indicators for 2021

Overall evaluation of the judge is excellent.
Incoming cases for the judge in 2021 were mostly from civil agenda. Judge's decrees in 2021 were mostly from civil agenda.

Component – Quality

We register 77.57% decrees for the judge, which are confirmed by the higher court in case of an appeal. The median amongst judges is 68,9%. We register 214 decrees concerning appeals.
In this dimension the judge belongs to the group that is better than average.

Component – Effectivity

The judge had overal appointment of cases of 126.63% in 2021. The median amongst judges is 107,9%.
Anticipated time of the judge was based on data from 2021 245 days. Median amongst judges was 224,3 days.
In 2021 the judge decided 409 cases in the observed agendas.
In this dimension the judge belongs to the group that is better than average.

Component – Productivity

Weighted product of the judge in 2021 was 408.784. Median amongst judges was 248,1.
For the judge we register 269 unresolved cases at the end of 2021. From those 52.79% are restant cases. Median amongst judges was 39,34% of restant cases from the total number of unresolved cases.
In this dimension the judge belongs to the group that is better than average.

Overall Evaluation
Evaluation on a scale from 0 to 10.

Indicators for 2017

Number of Constitutional Court decisions against the judge:

  • Issued – 0
  • Delays prior to case assignment – 0

The judge was mostly assigned to Civil agenda. The judge mostly issued judgements in Civil agenda.

The judge worked 1617 days in the period and was assigned on average 13 cases per 100 days in main agendas.

Evaluation

In 2017, the judge received in total 23.5 from 40 possible points and ranked on 224 – 243. place of 651 evaluated judges.

  • Quality – 12 out of 15 points
  • Effectivity – 11.5 out of 25 points

Chart Comparison

Legend
Advanced Comparison

Judge position

Judgement agenda

Similar court
The chart is most useful for comparisons of judges at the same or similar courts, and those who decide cases in the same or similar agenda. Specific courts and agendas have an impact on the overall performance of judges. Simply put, commercial judge from Bratislava and criminal judge from Rožňava decide uncomparable cases.

Quality Indicators

The judge's judgements were on appeal affirmed in 82.1% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 68.7%.

  • Number of Appellate Decisions – 140
  • Number of Affirmed Decisions – 115

An appeal against the judge's judgements is filed in 6% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 10.1%.

Of the total number of the judge's judgements 1.1% is changed or reversed. The average in the same agenda is 3.1%.

Effectivity Indicators

Estimated average length of proceedings is 405.6 days. The average at the end of 2017 was 340.8 days.

The judge had 170 unresolved cases at the end of 2017. The average was 192.7 cases.

The judge had 118 restant cases at the end of 2017. The average was 111.7. This represents 69.4% of the judge's unresolved cases. Average was 54.1%.

In 2017, the judge was able to resolve 170% of assigned cases. Average was 141.8%.

Indicators for 2015

Number of Constitutional Court decisions against the judge:

  • Issued – 0
  • Delays prior to case assignment – 0

The judge was mostly assigned to Civil agenda. The judge mostly issued judgements in Civil agenda.

The judge worked 1157 days in the period and was assigned on average 15 cases per 100 days in main agendas.

Evaluation

In 2015, the judge received in total 32 from 40 possible points and ranked on 22 – 30. place of 738 evaluated judges.

  • Quality – 12 out of 15 points
  • Effectivity – 20 out of 25 points

Chart Comparison

Legend
Advanced Comparison

Judge position

Judgement agenda

Similar court
The chart is most useful for comparisons of judges at the same or similar courts, and those who decide cases in the same or similar agenda. Specific courts and agendas have an impact on the overall performance of judges. Simply put, commercial judge from Bratislava and criminal judge from Rožňava decide uncomparable cases.

Quality Indicators

The judge's judgements were on appeal affirmed in 82.3% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 67.1%.

  • Number of Appellate Decisions – 113
  • Number of Affirmed Decisions – 93

An appeal against the judge's judgements is filed in 6% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 9.3%.

Of the total number of the judge's judgements 1.1% is changed or reversed. The average in the same agenda is 3%.

Effectivity Indicators

Estimated average length of proceedings is 152 days. The average at the end of 2015 was 339 days.

The judge had 257 unresolved cases at the end of 2015. The average was 377 cases.

The judge had 123 restant cases at the end of 2015. The average was 150. This represents 47.9% of the judge's unresolved cases. Average was 42.6%.

In 2015, the judge was able to resolve 133.3% of assigned cases. Average was 97.1%.

Indicators for 2013

The number of Constitutional court judgements against the judges – issued 0 and delays prior to case assignment 0.

For the judge we register performance data for years 2011 – 2013:

Sudcovi bola prideľovaná najmä Občiansko–právna agenda. Sudca rozhodoval najmä v Občiansko–právnej agende.

The judge in this period worked 704 days and on average was assigned 127 cases in 10 days in main agendas.

Chart Comparison

Legend
Advanced Comparison

Judge position

Judgement agenda

Similar court
The chart is most useful for comparisons of judges at the same or similar courts, and those who decide cases in the same or similar agenda. Specific courts and agendas have an impact on the overall performance of judges. Simply put, commercial judge from Bratislava and criminal judge from Rožňava decide uncomparable cases.

Quality indicators

Rozhodnutie sudcu bolo v prípade odvolania potvrdené v 77,9% prípadoch, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 62,9%.

  • Number of appellate judgements – 77
  • Number of confirmed judgements – 60

Odvolanie proti rozhodnutiam sudcu je podávané v približne 8,9% prípadoch, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 8,9%.

Z celkového počtu rozhodnutí sudcu je zmenených alebo zrušených 2%, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 3,3%.

Efficiency indicators

Odhadovaná priemerná dĺžka konania sporu je 184 dní. Priemer bol na konci roka 346 dní.

Sudca mal na konci roka 2013 nevybavených 196 prípadov. Priemer bol 238.

Sudca mal na konci roka 139 reštančných vecí, pričom priemer je 126. To u sudcu tvorí 49,6% z nevybavených vecí. Priemer je 43,4.

Sudca dokázal v roku 2013 vybaviť, k počtu pridelených vecí, 107,8% prípadov. Priemer bol 99,6%.

Sudca získal podľa našej metodológie celkovo 25,5 bodov. Spomedzi 739 hodnotených sudcov sa umiestnil na 143 – 153. mieste. Za kvalitu získal 11,25 z 15 možných bodov, za efektivitu 14,25 z 25.

Notes

obtained from annual statistical reports of judges pertaining to indicators.

  • 2012 – Sudca sa nezúčastnil žiadnej vzdelávacej aktivity.
  • 2012 – Sudca nemal znížený nápad.
  • 2011 – sudca sa nezúčastnil žiadnych vzdelávacích aktivít; 2012 – Sudca sa nezúčastnil žiadnej vzdelávacej aktivity.
  • 2011 – sudca sa nezúčastnil žiadnych vzdelávacích aktivít
  • 2011 – sudca nemá znížený nápad; 2012 – Sudca nemal znížený nápad.
  • 2011 – sudca nemá znížený nápad

Published judgements

  1. Rozsudok – Spotrebiteľské zmluvy
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  2. Rozsudok – Spotrebiteľské zmluvy
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  3. Rozsudok – Spotrebiteľské zmluvy
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  4. Uznesenie – Ostatné
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  5. Uznesenie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  6. Uznesenie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  7. Rozsudok – Spotrebiteľské zmluvy
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  8. Uznesenie Judgement was issued on

  9. Rozsudok – Spotrebiteľské zmluvy
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  10. Uznesenie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

More judgements

Upcoming hearings

We do not register any upcoming hearings for the judge yet.

Past hearings

  1. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, č.:33519-2/2018-BA zo dňa… Hearing was held on

    Court – Správny súd Bratislava
    Judge – JUDr. Zuzana Korčeková
    Proposer – X. K.
    Opponent – Z. T.
  2. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, č.:SPOU-PO-PK-57/2020 zo dňa… Hearing was held on

    Court – Správny súd Bratislava
    Judge – JUDr. Zuzana Korčeková
    Proposer – J. A.
    Opponent – X. I.
  3. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, starobný dôchodok Hearing was held on

    Court – Správny súd Bratislava
    Judge – JUDr. Zuzana Korčeková
    Proposer – Z. D.
    Opponent – G. F.
  4. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, predčasný starobný dôchodok Hearing was held on

    Court – Správny súd Bratislava
    Judge – JUDr. Zuzana Korčeková
    Proposer – I. Y.
    Opponent – O. D.
  5. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, č.:73919-2/2020-BA zo dňa… Hearing was held on

    Court – Správny súd Bratislava
    Judge – JUDr. Zuzana Korčeková
    Proposer – Z. A.
    Opponent – O. A.
  6. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, č.:21415-4/2017-BA zo dňa… Hearing was held on

    Court – Správny súd Bratislava
    Judge – JUDr. Zuzana Korčeková
    Proposer – A. W.
    Opponent – P. D.
  7. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, č.:21417-4/2016-BA zo dňa… Hearing was held on

    Court – Správny súd Bratislava
    Judge – JUDr. Zuzana Korčeková
    Proposer – L. J.
    Opponent – U. W.
  8. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, invalidný dôchodok Hearing was held on

    Court – Správny súd Bratislava
    Judge – JUDr. Zuzana Korčeková
    Proposer – O. A.
    Opponent – L. R.
  9. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, povinnosti vrátiť neprávom… Hearing was held on

    Court – Správny súd Bratislava
    Judge – JUDr. Zuzana Korčeková
    Proposer – W. Q.
    Opponent – S. T.
  10. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, iný zásah orgánu verejnej… Hearing was held on

    Court – Správny súd Bratislava
    Judge – JUDr. Zuzana Korčeková
    Proposer – L. B.
    Opponent – U. I.
More hearings

Information regarding the court were obtained from the judge list, which was most recently updated on . The information may have been additionally supplemented by the data retrieved from property declarations and statistical reports.