JUDr. Marián Manduch

  1. Active vice chairman at the court Okresný súd Trenčín, we register 2,172 hearings and 2,034 judgements.
    Note: .
  1. The judge has been nominated to function for almost 18 years.

Close persons acknowledged in property declarations in years 2013, 2012, and 2011.

Close persons acknowledged in property declaration in a year 2013:

Close persons acknowledged in property declaration in a year 2012:

Close persons acknowledged in property declaration in a year 2011:

Indicators for 2021

Overall evaluation of the judge is excellent.
Incoming cases for the judge in 2021 were mostly from criminal agenda. Judge's decrees in 2021 were mostly from criminal agenda.

Component – Quality

We register 73.83% decrees for the judge, which are confirmed by the higher court in case of an appeal. The median amongst judges is 68,9%. We register 405 decrees concerning appeals.
In this dimension the judge belongs to the group that is average.

Component – Effectivity

The judge had overal appointment of cases of 107.80% in 2021. The median amongst judges is 107,9%.
Anticipated time of the judge was based on data from 2021 60 days. Median amongst judges was 224,3 days.
In 2021 the judge decided 456 cases in the observed agendas.
In this dimension the judge belongs to the group that is better than average.

Component – Productivity

Weighted product of the judge in 2021 was 382.622. Median amongst judges was 248,1.
For the judge we register 73 unresolved cases at the end of 2021. From those 45.21% are restant cases. Median amongst judges was 39,34% of restant cases from the total number of unresolved cases.
In this dimension the judge belongs to the group that is better than average.

Overall Evaluation
Evaluation on a scale from 0 to 10.

Indicators for 2017

Number of Constitutional Court decisions against the judge:

  • Issued – 0
  • Delays prior to case assignment – 0

The judge was mostly assigned to Criminal agenda. The judge mostly issued judgements in translation missing: en.judges.indicators_2015.basic.decided_agenda.trestná.

The judge worked 1476 days in the period and was assigned on average 100 cases per 100 days in main agendas.

Evaluation

In 2017, the judge received in total 27.5 from 40 possible points and ranked on 69 – 80. place of 651 evaluated judges.

  • Quality – 10.5 out of 15 points
  • Effectivity – 17 out of 25 points

Chart Comparison

Legend
Advanced Comparison
The chart is most useful for comparisons of judges at the same or similar courts, and those who decide cases in the same or similar agenda. Specific courts and agendas have an impact on the overall performance of judges. Simply put, commercial judge from Bratislava and criminal judge from Rožňava decide uncomparable cases.

Quality Indicators

The judge's judgements were on appeal affirmed in 76% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 66%.

  • Number of Appellate Decisions – 304
  • Number of Affirmed Decisions – 231

An appeal against the judge's judgements is filed in 13.4% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 8.7%.

Of the total number of the judge's judgements 3.2% is changed or reversed. The average in the same agenda is 2.9%.

Effectivity Indicators

Estimated average length of proceedings is 59.4 days. The average at the end of 2017 was 340.8 days.

The judge had 41 unresolved cases at the end of 2017. The average was 192.7 cases.

The judge had 20 restant cases at the end of 2017. The average was 111.7. This represents 48.8% of the judge's unresolved cases. Average was 54.1%.

In 2017, the judge was able to resolve 114% of assigned cases. Average was 141.8%.

Indicators for 2015

Number of Constitutional Court decisions against the judge:

  • Issued – 0
  • Delays prior to case assignment – 0

The judge was mostly assigned to Criminal agenda. The judge mostly issued judgements in Criminal agenda.

The judge worked 1054 days in the period and was assigned on average 78 cases per 100 days in main agendas.

Evaluation

In 2015, the judge received in total 28.5 from 40 possible points and ranked on 91 – 106. place of 738 evaluated judges.

  • Quality – 9 out of 15 points
  • Effectivity – 19.5 out of 25 points

Chart Comparison

Legend
Advanced Comparison
The chart is most useful for comparisons of judges at the same or similar courts, and those who decide cases in the same or similar agenda. Specific courts and agendas have an impact on the overall performance of judges. Simply put, commercial judge from Bratislava and criminal judge from Rožňava decide uncomparable cases.

Quality Indicators

The judge's judgements were on appeal affirmed in 72.6% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 63.8%.

  • Number of Appellate Decisions – 223
  • Number of Affirmed Decisions – 162

An appeal against the judge's judgements is filed in 11.9% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 8.1%.

Of the total number of the judge's judgements 3.2% is changed or reversed. The average in the same agenda is 3%.

Effectivity Indicators

Estimated average length of proceedings is 95 days. The average at the end of 2015 was 339 days.

The judge had 51 unresolved cases at the end of 2015. The average was 377 cases.

The judge had 22 restant cases at the end of 2015. The average was 150. This represents 43.1% of the judge's unresolved cases. Average was 42.6%.

In 2015, the judge was able to resolve 117.4% of assigned cases. Average was 97.1%.

Indicators for 2013

The number of Constitutional court judgements against the judges – issued 0 and delays prior to case assignment 0.

For the judge we register performance data for years 2011 – 2013:

Sudcovi bola prideľovaná najmä Trestná agenda. Sudca rozhodoval najmä v Trestnej agende.

The judge in this period worked 646 days and on average was assigned 88 cases in 10 days in main agendas.

Chart Comparison

Legend
Advanced Comparison
The chart is most useful for comparisons of judges at the same or similar courts, and those who decide cases in the same or similar agenda. Specific courts and agendas have an impact on the overall performance of judges. Simply put, commercial judge from Bratislava and criminal judge from Rožňava decide uncomparable cases.

Quality indicators

Rozhodnutie sudcu bolo v prípade odvolania potvrdené v 63,1% prípadoch, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 52,3%.

  • Number of appellate judgements – 84
  • Number of confirmed judgements – 53

Odvolanie proti rozhodnutiam sudcu je podávané v približne 11,9% prípadoch, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 8,4%.

Z celkového počtu rozhodnutí sudcu je zmenených alebo zrušených 4,4%, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 4%.

Efficiency indicators

Odhadovaná priemerná dĺžka konania sporu je 56 dní. Priemer bol na konci roka 346 dní.

Sudca mal na konci roka 2013 nevybavených 35 prípadov. Priemer bol 238.

Sudca mal na konci roka 36 reštančných vecí, pričom priemer je 126. To u sudcu tvorí 42,4% z nevybavených vecí. Priemer je 43,4.

Sudca dokázal v roku 2013 vybaviť, k počtu pridelených vecí, 124,6% prípadov. Priemer bol 99,6%.

Sudca získal podľa našej metodológie celkovo 28,25 bodov. Spomedzi 739 hodnotených sudcov sa umiestnil na 65 – 68. mieste. Za kvalitu získal 8,75 z 15 možných bodov, za efektivitu 19,5 z 25.

Notes

obtained from annual statistical reports of judges pertaining to indicators.

  • 2013 – 14.–15.03.2013 Rozšírené zasadnutie trestného kolégia KS v Trenčíne, 02.–03.04.2013 Problematika dopravných trestných činov (dokazovanie, ukladanie trestov, znalecké dokazovanie), 18.06.2013 Pracovné stretnutie predsedov trestných grémií a trestných sudcov, 03.–04.10.2013 Celokrajské školenie sudcov KS v Trenčíne, 28.–29.10.2013 Väzba, zaistenie osôb a majetku v trestnom konaní
  • 2012 – 23.–24.04.2012 Rozšírené zasadnutie trestného kolégia KS v Trenčíne, 08.–09.10.2012 Rozšírené zasadnutie trestného kolégia KS v Trenčíne
  • 2011 – 28.–29. marca 2011 – zasadnutie rozšíreného trestného kolégia 07.–09. novembra 2011 – Obchodovanie s ľuďmi; 2012 – 23.–24.04.2012 Rozšírené zasadnutie trestného kolégia KS v Trenčíne, 08.–09.10.2012 Rozšírené zasadnutie trestného kolégia KS v Trenčíne; 2013 – 14.–15.03.2013 Rozšírené zasadnutie trestného kolégia KS v Trenčíne, 02.–03.04.2013 Problematika dopravných trestných činov (dokazovanie, ukladanie trestov, znalecké dokazovanie), 18.06.2013 Pracovné stretnutie predsedov trestných grémií a trestných sudcov, 03.–04.10.2013 Celokrajské školenie sudcov KS v Trenčíne, 28.–29.10.2013 Väzba, zaistenie osôb a majetku v trestnom konaní
  • 2011 – 28.–29. marca 2011 – zasadnutie rozšíreného trestného kolégia 07.–09. novembra 2011 – Obchodovanie s ľuďmi

Published judgements

  1. Rozsudok – Život a zdravie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  2. Rozsudok – Všeobecne nebezpečné a proti životnému…
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  3. Trestný rozkaz – Majetok
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  4. Trestný rozkaz – Všeobecne nebezpečné a proti…
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  5. Trestný rozkaz – Všeobecne nebezpečné a proti…
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  6. Trestný rozkaz – Majetok
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  7. Trestný rozkaz – Majetok
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  8. Trestný rozkaz – Iné práva a slobody
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  9. Trestný rozkaz – Majetok
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  10. Rozsudok – Majetok
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

More judgements

Upcoming hearings

We do not register any upcoming hearings for the judge yet.

Past hearings

  1. Hlavné pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, prečin krádeže Hearing was held on

    Court – Okresný súd Trenčín
    Judge – JUDr. Marián Manduch
    Defendant – W. T.
  2. Verejné zasadnutie bez rozhodnutia, prečin podvod Hearing was held on

    Court – Okresný súd Trenčín
    Judge – JUDr. Marián Manduch
    Defendant – G. A.
  3. Hlavné pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, prečin podvodu Hearing was held on

    Court – Okresný súd Trenčín
    Judge – JUDr. Marián Manduch
    Defendant – D. O.
  4. Hlavné pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, zločin prevádzačstva Hearing was held on

    Court – Okresný súd Trenčín
    Judge – JUDr. Marián Manduch
    Defendant – X. D.
  5. Hlavné pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, pokračovací zločin… Hearing was held on

    Court – Okresný súd Trenčín
    Judge – JUDr. Marián Manduch
    Defendant – U. X.
  6. Hlavné pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, prečin zanedbania… Hearing was held on

    Court – Okresný súd Trenčín
    Judge – JUDr. Marián Manduch
    Defendant – I. T.
  7. Verejné zasadnutie bez rozhodnutia, upustenie od výkonu… Hearing was held on

    Court – Okresný súd Trenčín
    Judge – JUDr. Marián Manduch
    Defendant – C. U.
  8. Verejné zasadnutie bez rozhodnutia, upustenie od výkonu… Hearing was held on

    Court – Okresný súd Trenčín
    Judge – JUDr. Marián Manduch
    Defendant – E. H.
  9. Hlavné pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, prečin podvodu a iné Hearing was held on

    Court – Okresný súd Trenčín
    Judge – JUDr. Marián Manduch
    Defendant – K. J.
  10. Hlavné pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, pokračovací obzvlášť… Hearing was held on

    Court – Okresný súd Trenčín
    Judge – JUDr. Marián Manduch
    Defendant – N. P.
More hearings

Information regarding the court were obtained from the judge list, which was most recently updated on . The information may have been additionally supplemented by the data retrieved from property declarations and statistical reports.