We do not register any indicators for the judge yet.
Number of Constitutional Court decisions against the judge:
The judge was mostly assigned to Civil agenda. The judge mostly issued judgements in Civil agenda.
The judge worked 935 days in the period and was assigned on average 25 cases per 100 days in main agendas.
In 2015, the judge received in total 16.5 from 40 possible points and ranked on 576 – 590. place of 738 evaluated judges.
The judge's judgements were on appeal affirmed in 61.7% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 67.1%.
An appeal against the judge's judgements is filed in 7% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 9.3%.
Of the total number of the judge's judgements 2.7% is changed or reversed. The average in the same agenda is 3%.
Estimated average length of proceedings is 390 days. The average at the end of 2015 was 339 days.
The judge had 484 unresolved cases at the end of 2015. The average was 377 cases.
The judge had 209 restant cases at the end of 2015. The average was 150. This represents 43.2% of the judge's unresolved cases. Average was 42.6%.
In 2015, the judge was able to resolve 90.1% of assigned cases. Average was 97.1%.
The number of Constitutional court judgements against the judges – issued 0 and delays prior to case assignment 0.
For the judge we register performance data for years 2011 – 2013:
Sudcovi bola prideľovaná najmä Občiansko–právna agenda. Sudca rozhodoval najmä v Občiansko–právnej agende.
The judge in this period worked 595 days and on average was assigned 198 cases in 10 days in main agendas.
Rozhodnutie sudcu bolo v prípade odvolania potvrdené v 55,1% prípadoch, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 62,9%.
Odvolanie proti rozhodnutiam sudcu je podávané v približne 8,3% prípadoch, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 8,9%.
Z celkového počtu rozhodnutí sudcu je zmenených alebo zrušených 3,7%, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 3,3%.
Odhadovaná priemerná dĺžka konania sporu je 0 dní. Priemer bol na konci roka 346 dní.
Sudca mal na konci roka 2013 nevybavených 0 prípadov. Priemer bol 238.
Dáta o reštančných prípadoch považujeme za málo reprezentatívne a preto ich neprezentujeme.
Sudca dokázal v roku 2013 vybaviť, k počtu pridelených vecí, 71,9% prípadov. Priemer bol 99,6%.
Dáta o kvalite a efektivite sudcu nepovažujeme za dostatočné, preto sudcu bodovo nehodnotíme.
Notes about the data obtained from annual statistical reports of judges pertaining to indicators.
Information regarding the court were obtained from the judge list, which was most recently updated on . The information may have been additionally supplemented by the data retrieved from property declarations and statistical reports.