Close persons acknowledged in property declarations in years 2014, 2013, 2012, and 2011.
Close persons acknowledged in property declaration in a year 2014:
Close persons acknowledged in property declaration in a year 2013:
Close persons acknowledged in property declaration in a year 2012:
Close persons acknowledged in property declaration in a year 2011:
We do not register any indicators for the judge yet.
Number of Constitutional Court decisions against the judge:
The judge was mostly assigned to Criminal agenda. The judge mostly issued judgements in translation missing: en.judges.indicators_2015.basic.decided_agenda.trestná.
The judge worked 1506 days in the period and was assigned on average 121 cases per 100 days in main agendas.
In 2017, the judge received in total 25.5 from 40 possible points and ranked on 133 – 155. place of 651 evaluated judges.
The judge's judgements were on appeal affirmed in 72.5% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 66%.
An appeal against the judge's judgements is filed in 9.8% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 8.7%.
Of the total number of the judge's judgements 2.7% is changed or reversed. The average in the same agenda is 2.9%.
Estimated average length of proceedings is 72.4 days. The average at the end of 2017 was 340.8 days.
The judge had 74 unresolved cases at the end of 2017. The average was 192.7 cases.
The judge had 27 restant cases at the end of 2017. The average was 111.7. This represents 36.5% of the judge's unresolved cases. Average was 54.1%.
In 2017, the judge was able to resolve 107.2% of assigned cases. Average was 141.8%.
Number of Constitutional Court decisions against the judge:
The judge was mostly assigned to Criminal agenda. The judge mostly issued judgements in Criminal agenda.
The judge worked 1067 days in the period and was assigned on average 88 cases per 100 days in main agendas.
In 2015, the judge received in total 29.5 from 40 possible points and ranked on 64 – 73. place of 738 evaluated judges.
The judge's judgements were on appeal affirmed in 70.5% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 63.8%.
An appeal against the judge's judgements is filed in 8.7% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 8.1%.
Of the total number of the judge's judgements 2.6% is changed or reversed. The average in the same agenda is 3%.
Estimated average length of proceedings is 62 days. The average at the end of 2015 was 339 days.
The judge had 63 unresolved cases at the end of 2015. The average was 377 cases.
The judge had 12 restant cases at the end of 2015. The average was 150. This represents 19% of the judge's unresolved cases. Average was 42.6%.
In 2015, the judge was able to resolve 105.1% of assigned cases. Average was 97.1%.
The number of Constitutional court judgements against the judges – issued 0 and delays prior to case assignment 0.
For the judge we register performance data for years 2011 – 2013:
Sudcovi bola prideľovaná najmä Trestná agenda. Sudca rozhodoval najmä v Trestnej agende.
The judge in this period worked 642 days and on average was assigned 127 cases in 10 days in main agendas.
Rozhodnutie sudcu bolo v prípade odvolania potvrdené v 60,9% prípadoch, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 52,3%.
Odvolanie proti rozhodnutiam sudcu je podávané v približne 7,7% prípadoch, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 8,4%.
Z celkového počtu rozhodnutí sudcu je zmenených alebo zrušených 3%, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 4%.
Odhadovaná priemerná dĺžka konania sporu je –1 dní. Priemer bol na konci roka 346 dní.
Sudca mal na konci roka 2013 nevybavených –1 prípadov. Priemer bol 238.
Dáta o reštančných prípadoch považujeme za málo reprezentatívne a preto ich neprezentujeme.
Sudca dokázal v roku 2013 vybaviť, k počtu pridelených vecí, 108,6% prípadov. Priemer bol 99,6%.
Dáta o kvalite a efektivite sudcu nepovažujeme za dostatočné, preto sudcu bodovo nehodnotíme.
Notes about the data obtained from annual statistical reports of judges pertaining to indicators.
Information regarding the court were obtained from the judge list, which was most recently updated on . The information may have been additionally supplemented by the data retrieved from property declarations and statistical reports.