JUDr. Alexandra Mochnacká

  1. Active judge at the court Okresný súd Poprad, we register 2,132 hearings and 1,188 judgements.

Indicators for 2021

Overall evaluation of the judge is below average.
Incoming cases for the judge in 2021 were mostly from civil agenda. Judge's decrees in 2021 were mostly from civil agenda.

Component – Quality

We register 67.95% decrees for the judge, which are confirmed by the higher court in case of an appeal. The median amongst judges is 68,9%. We register 259 decrees concerning appeals.
In this dimension the judge belongs to the group that is average.

Component – Effectivity

The judge had overal appointment of cases of 43.58% in 2021. The median amongst judges is 107,9%.
Anticipated time of the judge was based on data from 2021 750 days. Median amongst judges was 224,3 days.
In 2021 the judge decided 173 cases in the observed agendas.
In this dimension the judge belongs to the group that is worse than average.

Component – Productivity

Weighted product of the judge in 2021 was 173. Median amongst judges was 248,1.
For the judge we register 337 unresolved cases at the end of 2021. From those 36.20% are restant cases. Median amongst judges was 39,34% of restant cases from the total number of unresolved cases.
In this dimension the judge belongs to the group that is average.

Overall Evaluation
Evaluation on a scale from 0 to 10.

Indicators for 2017

We do not register any indicators for the judge yet.

Indicators for 2015

Number of Constitutional Court decisions against the judge:

  • Issued – 0
  • Delays prior to case assignment – 0

The judge was mostly assigned to Civil agenda. The judge mostly issued judgements in Civil agenda.

The judge worked 559 days in the period and was assigned on average 26 cases per 100 days in main agendas.

Evaluation

In 2015, the judge received in total 20.5 from 40 possible points and ranked on 417 – 443. place of 738 evaluated judges.

  • Quality – 7.5 out of 15 points
  • Effectivity – 13 out of 25 points

Chart Comparison

Legend
Advanced Comparison
The chart is most useful for comparisons of judges at the same or similar courts, and those who decide cases in the same or similar agenda. Specific courts and agendas have an impact on the overall performance of judges. Simply put, commercial judge from Bratislava and criminal judge from Rožňava decide uncomparable cases.

Quality Indicators

The judge's judgements were on appeal affirmed in 64.9% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 67.1%.

  • Number of Appellate Decisions – 151
  • Number of Affirmed Decisions – 98

An appeal against the judge's judgements is filed in 14% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 9.3%.

Of the total number of the judge's judgements 4.9% is changed or reversed. The average in the same agenda is 3%.

Effectivity Indicators

Estimated average length of proceedings is 50 days. The average at the end of 2015 was 339 days.

The judge had 26 unresolved cases at the end of 2015. The average was 377 cases.

The judge had 10 restant cases at the end of 2015. The average was 150. This represents 38.5% of the judge's unresolved cases. Average was 42.6%.

In 2015, the judge was able to resolve 54.6% of assigned cases. Average was 97.1%.

Indicators for 2013

We do not register any indicators for the judge yet.

Published judgements

  1. Rozsudok – Bezpodielové spoluvlastníctvo manželov
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  2. Uznesenie – Zmluvy
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  3. Uznesenie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  4. Rozsudok – Spotrebiteľské zmluvy
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  5. Rozsudok – Spotrebiteľské zmluvy
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  6. Uznesenie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  7. Rozsudok – Spotrebiteľské zmluvy
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  8. Rozsudok – Spotrebiteľské zmluvy
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  9. Rozsudok pre zmeškanie – Pracovné právo
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  10. Uznesenie
    Potvrdené
    Judgement was issued on

More judgements

Upcoming hearings

We do not register any upcoming hearings for the judge yet.

Past hearings

  1. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, o zaplatenie 100.000,-- € s… Hearing was held on

  2. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, zaplatenie 5.030,- s prísl. Hearing was held on

  3. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, o vysporiadanie BSM po… Hearing was held on

  4. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, o zaplatenie 4.804,45 Eur s… Hearing was held on

  5. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, o neplatnosť skončenia… Hearing was held on

  6. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, náhrada škody vo výške… Hearing was held on

  7. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, zaplatenie 2.595,13 € s prísl. Hearing was held on

  8. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, vylúčenie z užívania domu Hearing was held on

  9. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, o určenie neexistencie… Hearing was held on

  10. Predbežné prejednanie sporu, určenie vlastníckeho práva k… Hearing was held on

More hearings

Information regarding the court were obtained from the judge list, which was most recently updated on . The information may have been additionally supplemented by the data retrieved from property declarations and statistical reports.