Close persons acknowledged in property declarations in years 2013, 2012, and 2011.
Close persons acknowledged in property declaration in a year 2013:
Close persons acknowledged in property declaration in a year 2012:
Close persons acknowledged in property declaration in a year 2011:
Notes about the data obtained from annual statistical reports of judges.
We do not register any indicators for the judge yet.
We do not register any indicators for the judge yet.
Number of Constitutional Court decisions against the judge:
The judge was mostly assigned to Criminal agenda. The judge mostly issued judgements in Criminal agenda.
The judge worked 1096 days in the period and was assigned on average 115 cases per 100 days in main agendas.
In 2015, the judge received in total 23 from 40 possible points and ranked on 304 – 323. place of 738 evaluated judges.
The judge's judgements were on appeal affirmed in 59.7% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 63.8%.
An appeal against the judge's judgements is filed in 6.7% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 8.1%.
Of the total number of the judge's judgements 2.7% is changed or reversed. The average in the same agenda is 3%.
Estimated average length of proceedings is 110 days. The average at the end of 2015 was 339 days.
The judge had 198 unresolved cases at the end of 2015. The average was 377 cases.
The judge had 76 restant cases at the end of 2015. The average was 150. This represents 38.4% of the judge's unresolved cases. Average was 42.6%.
In 2015, the judge was able to resolve 95.9% of assigned cases. Average was 97.1%.
The number of Constitutional court judgements against the judges – issued 0 and delays prior to case assignment 0.
For the judge we register performance data for years 2011 – 2013:
Sudcovi bola prideľovaná najmä Trestná agenda. Sudca rozhodoval najmä v Trestnej agende.
The judge in this period worked 653 days and on average was assigned 117 cases in 10 days in main agendas.
Rozhodnutie sudcu bolo v prípade odvolania potvrdené v 55,1% prípadoch, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 52,3%.
Odvolanie proti rozhodnutiam sudcu je podávané v približne 7,7% prípadoch, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 8,4%.
Z celkového počtu rozhodnutí sudcu je zmenených alebo zrušených 3,5%, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 4%.
Odhadovaná priemerná dĺžka konania sporu je 65 dní. Priemer bol na konci roka 346 dní.
Sudca mal na konci roka 2013 nevybavených 57 prípadov. Priemer bol 238.
Sudca mal na konci roka 19 reštančných vecí, pričom priemer je 126. To u sudcu tvorí 24,7% z nevybavených vecí. Priemer je 43,4.
Sudca dokázal v roku 2013 vybaviť, k počtu pridelených vecí, 110,7% prípadov. Priemer bol 99,6%.
Sudca získal podľa našej metodológie celkovo 28,5 bodov. Spomedzi 739 hodnotených sudcov sa umiestnil na 54 – 64. mieste. Za kvalitu získal 8 z 15 možných bodov, za efektivitu 20,5 z 25.
Notes about the data obtained from annual statistical reports of judges pertaining to indicators.
We do not register any upcoming hearings for the judge yet.
Information regarding the court were obtained from the judge list, which was most recently updated on . The information may have been additionally supplemented by the data retrieved from property declarations and statistical reports.