JUDr. Arpád Pastorek

  1. Active judge at the court Okresný súd Komárno, we register 2,369 hearings and 2,374 judgements.
  2. Inactive judge at the court Okresný súd Levice, we register 1,037 hearings and 405 judgements.

obtained from annual statistical reports of judges.

Indicators for 2021

Overall evaluation of the judge is average.
Incoming cases for the judge in 2021 were mostly from civil agenda. Judge's decrees in 2021 were mostly from civil agenda.

Component – Quality

We register 49.14% decrees for the judge, which are confirmed by the higher court in case of an appeal. The median amongst judges is 68,9%. We register 348 decrees concerning appeals.
In this dimension the judge belongs to the group that is worse than average.

Component – Effectivity

The judge had overal appointment of cases of 131.62% in 2021. The median amongst judges is 107,9%.
Anticipated time of the judge was based on data from 2021 266 days. Median amongst judges was 224,3 days.
In 2021 the judge decided 308 cases in the observed agendas.
In this dimension the judge belongs to the group that is better than average.

Component – Productivity

Weighted product of the judge in 2021 was 308. Median amongst judges was 248,1.
For the judge we register 200 unresolved cases at the end of 2021. From those 44.00% are restant cases. Median amongst judges was 39,34% of restant cases from the total number of unresolved cases.
In this dimension the judge belongs to the group that is average.

Overall Evaluation
Evaluation on a scale from 0 to 10.

Indicators for 2017

Number of Constitutional Court decisions against the judge:

  • Issued – 5
  • Delays prior to case assignment – 4

The judge was mostly assigned to Civil agenda. The judge mostly issued judgements in Civil agenda.

The judge worked 1371 days in the period and was assigned on average 39 cases per 100 days in main agendas.

Evaluation

In 2017, the judge received in total 16.5 from 40 possible points and ranked on 539 – 548. place of 651 evaluated judges.

  • Quality – 3 out of 15 points
  • Effectivity – 13.5 out of 25 points

Chart Comparison

Legend
Advanced Comparison

Judge position

Judgement agenda

Similar court
The chart is most useful for comparisons of judges at the same or similar courts, and those who decide cases in the same or similar agenda. Specific courts and agendas have an impact on the overall performance of judges. Simply put, commercial judge from Bratislava and criminal judge from Rožňava decide uncomparable cases.

Quality Indicators

The judge's judgements were on appeal affirmed in 53.6% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 68.7%.

  • Number of Appellate Decisions – 263
  • Number of Affirmed Decisions – 141

An appeal against the judge's judgements is filed in 8.5% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 10.1%.

Of the total number of the judge's judgements 3.9% is changed or reversed. The average in the same agenda is 3.1%.

Effectivity Indicators

Estimated average length of proceedings is 432.6 days. The average at the end of 2017 was 340.8 days.

The judge had 397 unresolved cases at the end of 2017. The average was 192.7 cases.

The judge had 329 restant cases at the end of 2017. The average was 111.7. This represents 82.9% of the judge's unresolved cases. Average was 54.1%.

In 2017, the judge was able to resolve 279.2% of assigned cases. Average was 141.8%.

Indicators for 2015

Number of Constitutional Court decisions against the judge:

  • Issued – 2
  • Delays prior to case assignment – 1

The judge was mostly assigned to Civil agenda. The judge mostly issued judgements in Civil agenda.

The judge worked 982 days in the period and was assigned on average 46 cases per 100 days in main agendas.

Evaluation

In 2015, the judge received in total 6 from 40 possible points and ranked on 732 – 733. place of 738 evaluated judges.

  • Quality – 6 out of 15 points
  • Effectivity – 0 out of 25 points

Chart Comparison

Legend
Advanced Comparison

Judge position

Judgement agenda

Similar court
The chart is most useful for comparisons of judges at the same or similar courts, and those who decide cases in the same or similar agenda. Specific courts and agendas have an impact on the overall performance of judges. Simply put, commercial judge from Bratislava and criminal judge from Rožňava decide uncomparable cases.

Quality Indicators

The judge's judgements were on appeal affirmed in 59.7% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 67.1%.

  • Number of Appellate Decisions – 201
  • Number of Affirmed Decisions – 120

An appeal against the judge's judgements is filed in 9.5% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 9.3%.

Of the total number of the judge's judgements 3.8% is changed or reversed. The average in the same agenda is 3%.

Effectivity Indicators

Estimated average length of proceedings is 1324 days. The average at the end of 2015 was 339 days.

The judge had 1085 unresolved cases at the end of 2015. The average was 377 cases.

The judge had 793 restant cases at the end of 2015. The average was 150. This represents 73.1% of the judge's unresolved cases. Average was 42.6%.

In 2015, the judge was able to resolve 22.9% of assigned cases. Average was 97.1%.

Indicators for 2013

The number of Constitutional court judgements against the judges – issued 1 and delays prior to case assignment 0.

For the judge we register performance data for years 2011 – 2013:

Sudcovi bola prideľovaná najmä Občiansko–právna agenda. Sudca rozhodoval najmä v Občiansko–právnej agende.

The judge in this period worked 606 days and on average was assigned 262 cases in 10 days in main agendas.

Chart Comparison

Legend
Advanced Comparison

Judge position

Judgement agenda

Similar court
The chart is most useful for comparisons of judges at the same or similar courts, and those who decide cases in the same or similar agenda. Specific courts and agendas have an impact on the overall performance of judges. Simply put, commercial judge from Bratislava and criminal judge from Rožňava decide uncomparable cases.

Quality indicators

Rozhodnutie sudcu bolo v prípade odvolania potvrdené v 53,3% prípadoch, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 62,9%.

  • Number of appellate judgements – 60
  • Number of confirmed judgements – 32

Odvolanie proti rozhodnutiam sudcu je podávané v približne 4,2% prípadoch, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 8,9%.

Z celkového počtu rozhodnutí sudcu je zmenených alebo zrušených 2%, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 3,3%.

Efficiency indicators

Odhadovaná priemerná dĺžka konania sporu je 504 dní. Priemer bol na konci roka 346 dní.

Sudca mal na konci roka 2013 nevybavených 544 prípadov. Priemer bol 238.

Sudca mal na konci roka 278 reštančných vecí, pričom priemer je 126. To u sudcu tvorí 49,8% z nevybavených vecí. Priemer je 43,4.

Sudca dokázal v roku 2013 vybaviť, k počtu pridelených vecí, 94,3% prípadov. Priemer bol 99,6%.

Sudca získal podľa našej metodológie celkovo 13,25 bodov. Spomedzi 739 hodnotených sudcov sa umiestnil na 663 – 669. mieste. Za kvalitu získal 7 z 15 možných bodov, za efektivitu 6,25 z 25.

Notes

obtained from annual statistical reports of judges pertaining to indicators.

  • 2013 – Sudca nemal znížený nápad.
  • 2013 – Nevykazujeme účasť.
  • 2012 – Sudca sa zúčastnil na vzdelávacích aktivitách 2x
  • 2012 – Nebol dôvod na zníženie nápadu
  • 2011 – nemá znížený nápad ; 2012 – Nebol dôvod na zníženie nápadu; 2013 – Sudca nemal znížený nápad.
  • 2011 – nemá znížený nápad
  • 2011 – 0 ; 2012 – Sudca sa zúčastnil na vzdelávacích aktivitách 2x; 2013 – Nevykazujeme účasť.
  • 2011 – 0

Published judgements

  1. Uznesenie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  2. Uznesenie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  3. Rozsudok – Spotrebiteľské zmluvy
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  4. Rozsudok – Spotrebiteľské zmluvy
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  5. Rozsudok – Ostatné
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  6. Rozsudok – Spotrebiteľské zmluvy
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  7. Rozsudok – Spotrebiteľské zmluvy
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  8. Rozsudok – Spotrebiteľské zmluvy
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  9. Uznesenie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  10. Rozsudok – Spotrebiteľské zmluvy
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

More judgements

Upcoming hearings

We do not register any upcoming hearings for the judge yet.

Past hearings

  1. Verejné vyhlásenie rozsudku, o zaplatenie 4.822,3 Eur s… Hearing was held on

  2. Verejné vyhlásenie rozsudku, o zaplatenie 320,67 EUR s… Hearing was held on

  3. Verejné vyhlásenie rozsudku, zaplatenie 78,00 € s prísl. Hearing was held on

  4. Verejné vyhlásenie rozsudku, o zaplatenie 587,66 Eur s… Hearing was held on

  5. Verejné vyhlásenie rozsudku, zaplatenie 55,80 EUR s prísl. Hearing was held on

  6. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, o zaplatenie 41994,84 Eur s… Hearing was held on

  7. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, zaplatenie 29.377,- € s… Hearing was held on

  8. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, vypratanie nehnuteľnosti vo… Hearing was held on

  9. Verejné vyhlásenie rozsudku, o zaplatenie 186,97 EUR s… Hearing was held on

  10. Verejné vyhlásenie rozsudku, o zaplatenie 519,53 Eur s… Hearing was held on

More hearings

Information regarding the court were obtained from the judge list, which was most recently updated on . The information may have been additionally supplemented by the data retrieved from property declarations and statistical reports.