Overall evaluation of the judge is above average.
Incoming cases for the judge in 2021 were mostly from civil agenda. Judge's decrees in 2021 were mostly from civil agenda.
We register 70.08% decrees for the judge, which are confirmed by the higher court in case of an appeal. The median amongst judges is 68,9%.
We register 244 decrees concerning appeals.
In this dimension the judge belongs to the group that is average.
The judge had overal appointment of cases of 118.23% in 2021. The median amongst judges is 107,9%.
Anticipated time of the judge was based on data from 2021 130 days. Median amongst judges was 224,3 days.
In 2021 the judge decided 214 cases in the observed agendas.
In this dimension the judge belongs to the group that is better than average.
Weighted product of the judge in 2021 was 200.852. Median amongst judges was 248,1.
For the judge we register 77 unresolved cases at the end of 2021. From those 20.78% are restant cases. Median amongst judges was 39,34% of restant cases from the total number of unresolved cases.
In this dimension the judge belongs to the group that is average.
Number of Constitutional Court decisions against the judge:
The judge was mostly assigned to Civil agenda. The judge mostly issued judgements in Civil agenda.
The judge worked 1237 days in the period and was assigned on average 20 cases per 100 days in main agendas.
In 2017, the judge received in total 25 from 40 possible points and ranked on 156 – 178. place of 651 evaluated judges.
The judge's judgements were on appeal affirmed in 64.9% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 68.7%.
An appeal against the judge's judgements is filed in 11.8% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 10.1%.
Of the total number of the judge's judgements 4.2% is changed or reversed. The average in the same agenda is 3.1%.
Estimated average length of proceedings is 96.1 days. The average at the end of 2017 was 340.8 days.
The judge had 45 unresolved cases at the end of 2017. The average was 192.7 cases.
The judge had 28 restant cases at the end of 2017. The average was 111.7. This represents 62.2% of the judge's unresolved cases. Average was 54.1%.
In 2017, the judge was able to resolve 203.6% of assigned cases. Average was 141.8%.
We do not register any indicators for the judge yet.
The number of Constitutional court judgements against the judges – issued 0 and delays prior to case assignment 0.
For the judge we register performance data for years 2011 – 2013:
Sudcovi bola prideľovaná najmä Občiansko–právna agenda. Sudca rozhodoval najmä v Občiansko–právnej agende.
The judge in this period worked 630 days and on average was assigned 172 cases in 10 days in main agendas.
Rozhodnutie sudcu bolo v prípade odvolania potvrdené v 60,3% prípadoch, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 62,9%.
Odvolanie proti rozhodnutiam sudcu je podávané v približne 7,5% prípadoch, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 8,9%.
Z celkového počtu rozhodnutí sudcu je zmenených alebo zrušených 3%, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 3,3%.
Odhadovaná priemerná dĺžka konania sporu je 176 dní. Priemer bol na konci roka 346 dní.
Sudca mal na konci roka 2013 nevybavených 124 prípadov. Priemer bol 238.
Sudca mal na konci roka 101 reštančných vecí, pričom priemer je 126. To u sudcu tvorí 54% z nevybavených vecí. Priemer je 43,4.
Sudca dokázal v roku 2013 vybaviť, k počtu pridelených vecí, 166,9% prípadov. Priemer bol 99,6%.
Sudca získal podľa našej metodológie celkovo 23,5 bodov. Spomedzi 739 hodnotených sudcov sa umiestnil na 233 – 240. mieste. Za kvalitu získal 7 z 15 možných bodov, za efektivitu 16,5 z 25.
Notes about the data obtained from annual statistical reports of judges pertaining to indicators.
Information regarding the court were obtained from the judge list, which was most recently updated on . The information may have been additionally supplemented by the data retrieved from property declarations and statistical reports.