Mgr. Viera Petrová

  1. Active judge at the court Okresný súd Trebišov, we register 3,318 hearings and 4,081 judgements.
  1. The judge has been nominated to function for about 17 years.

obtained from annual statistical reports of judges.

Indicators for 2017

Number of Constitutional Court decisions against the judge:

  • Issued – 0
  • Delays prior to case assignment – 0

The judge was mostly assigned to Civil agenda. The judge mostly issued judgements in Civil agenda.

The judge worked 1518 days in the period and was assigned on average 58 cases per 100 days in main agendas.

Evaluation

In 2017, the judge received in total 24.5 from 40 possible points and ranked on 179 – 200. place of 651 evaluated judges.

  • Quality – 9 out of 15 points
  • Effectivity – 15.5 out of 25 points

Chart Comparison

Legend
Advanced Comparison
The chart is most useful for comparisons of judges at the same or similar courts, and those who decide cases in the same or similar agenda. Specific courts and agendas have an impact on the overall performance of judges. Simply put, commercial judge from Bratislava and criminal judge from Rožňava decide uncomparable cases.

Quality Indicators

The judge's judgements were on appeal affirmed in 73.8% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 68.7%.

  • Number of Appellate Decisions – 103
  • Number of Affirmed Decisions – 76

An appeal against the judge's judgements is filed in 3.8% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 10.1%.

Of the total number of the judge's judgements 1% is changed or reversed. The average in the same agenda is 3.1%.

Effectivity Indicators

Estimated average length of proceedings is 222.8 days. The average at the end of 2017 was 340.8 days.

The judge had 116 unresolved cases at the end of 2017. The average was 192.7 cases.

The judge had 77 restant cases at the end of 2017. The average was 111.7. This represents 66.4% of the judge's unresolved cases. Average was 54.1%.

In 2017, the judge was able to resolve 174.3% of assigned cases. Average was 141.8%.

Indicators for 2015

Number of Constitutional Court decisions against the judge:

  • Issued – 0
  • Delays prior to case assignment – 0

The judge was mostly assigned to Civil agenda. The judge mostly issued judgements in Civil agenda.

The judge worked 1095 days in the period and was assigned on average 55 cases per 100 days in main agendas.

Evaluation

In 2015, the judge received in total 25 from 40 possible points and ranked on 214 – 237. place of 738 evaluated judges.

  • Quality – 10.5 out of 15 points
  • Effectivity – 14.5 out of 25 points

Quality Indicators

The judge's judgements were on appeal affirmed in 76.1% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 67.1%.

  • Number of Appellate Decisions – 46
  • Number of Affirmed Decisions – 35

An appeal against the judge's judgements is filed in 2.2% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 9.3%.

Of the total number of the judge's judgements 0.5% is changed or reversed. The average in the same agenda is 3%.

Effectivity Indicators

Estimated average length of proceedings is 230 days. The average at the end of 2015 was 339 days.

The judge had 486 unresolved cases at the end of 2015. The average was 377 cases.

The judge had 96 restant cases at the end of 2015. The average was 150. This represents 19.8% of the judge's unresolved cases. Average was 42.6%.

In 2015, the judge was able to resolve 86.8% of assigned cases. Average was 97.1%.

Indicators for 2013

The number of Constitutional court judgements against the judges – issued 0 and delays prior to case assignment 0.

For the judge we register performance data for years 2011 – 2013:

Sudcovi bola prideľovaná najmä agenda Starostlivosti o maloletých. Sudca rozhodoval najmä v agende Starostlivosti o maloletých.

The judge in this period worked 667 days and on average was assigned 149 cases in 10 days in main agendas.

Quality indicators

Rozhodnutie sudcu bolo v prípade odvolania potvrdené v 83,3% prípadoch, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 65,5%.

  • Number of appellate judgements – 24
  • Number of confirmed judgements – 20

Odvolanie proti rozhodnutiam sudcu je podávané v približne 2,4% prípadoch, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 7,2%.

Z celkového počtu rozhodnutí sudcu je zmenených alebo zrušených 0,4%, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 2,5%.

Efficiency indicators

Odhadovaná priemerná dĺžka konania sporu je 180 dní. Priemer bol na konci roka 346 dní.

Sudca mal na konci roka 2013 nevybavených 154 prípadov. Priemer bol 238.

Sudca mal na konci roka 52 reštančných vecí, pričom priemer je 126. To u sudcu tvorí 33,5% z nevybavených vecí. Priemer je 43,4.

Sudca dokázal v roku 2013 vybaviť, k počtu pridelených vecí, 97,5% prípadov. Priemer bol 99,6%.

Sudca získal podľa našej metodológie celkovo 29,25 bodov. Spomedzi 739 hodnotených sudcov sa umiestnil na 43 – 45. mieste. Za kvalitu získal 12,75 z 15 možných bodov, za efektivitu 16,5 z 25.

Notes

obtained from annual statistical reports of judges pertaining to indicators.

  • 2013 – 18.9.2013 – Rozvod, výška výživného, posudzovanie príjmov rodičov, nariadenie 4/2009 o výživovacej povinnosti, BSM
  • 2012 – 22.11.2012 – Striedavá osobná starostlivosť, psychologické aspekty; 2013 – 18.9.2013 – Rozvod, výška výživného, posudzovanie príjmov rodičov, nariadenie 4/2009 o výživovacej povinnosti, BSM
  • 2012 – 22.11.2012 – Striedavá osobná starostlivosť, psychologické aspekty

Published judgements

  1. Uznesenie – Starostlivosť o maloletých
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  2. Rozsudok – Starostlivosť o maloletých
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  3. Rozsudok – Schválenie právneho úkonu
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  4. Uznesenie – Starostlivosť o maloletých
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  5. Rozsudok – Starostlivosť o maloletých
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  6. Uznesenie – Starostlivosť o maloletých
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  7. Rozsudok – Vyživovacie povinnosti
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  8. Rozsudok – Starostlivosť o maloletých
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  9. Rozsudok – Starostlivosť o maloletých
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  10. Rozsudok – Schválenie právneho úkonu
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

More judgements

Upcoming hearings

  1. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, zverenie do náhradnej osobnej… Hearing will be held on

  2. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, rozvod Hearing will be held on

  3. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, rozvod Hearing will be held on

  4. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, zmenu rodičovských práv a… Hearing will be held on

  5. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, neodkladné opatrenie a zverenie… Hearing will be held on

  6. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, rozvod a úpravu rodičovských… Hearing will be held on

  7. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, NÁVRH NA ZMENU ÚPRAVY STYKU –… Hearing will be held on

  8. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, úpravu rodičovských práv a… Hearing will be held on

  9. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, zvýšenie výživného Hearing will be held on

  10. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, zníženie výživného k plnoletému… Hearing will be held on

More hearings

Past hearings

  1. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, nariadenie neodkladného… Hearing was held on

  2. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, priznane rodičovských práv a… Hearing was held on

  3. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, rozvod Hearing was held on

  4. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, rozvod Hearing was held on

  5. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, rozvod a úprava výkonu… Hearing was held on

  6. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, výkon rozhodnutia vo veci… Hearing was held on

  7. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, zverenie do náhradnej osobnej… Hearing was held on

  8. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, zverenie do náhradnej osobnej… Hearing was held on

  9. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, zmena opatrovníka Hearing was held on

  10. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, výkon rozhodnutia o úprave… Hearing was held on

More hearings

Information regarding the court were obtained from the judge list, which was most recently updated on . The information may have been additionally supplemented by the data retrieved from property declarations and statistical reports.