JUDr. Anna Pikulová

  1. Active judge at the court Okresný súd Banská Bystrica, we register 3,375 hearings and 2,187 judgements.
  1. The judge has been nominated to function for almost 26 years, bez časového obmedzenia funkcie.

obtained from annual statistical reports of judges.

Indicators for 2021

Overall evaluation of the judge is average.
Incoming cases for the judge in 2021 were mostly from business agenda. Judge's decrees in 2021 were mostly from business agenda.

Component – Quality

We register 77.42% decrees for the judge, which are confirmed by the higher court in case of an appeal. The median amongst judges is 68,9%. We register 155 decrees concerning appeals.
In this dimension the judge belongs to the group that is better than average.

Component – Effectivity

The judge had overal appointment of cases of 131.08% in 2021. The median amongst judges is 107,9%.
Anticipated time of the judge was based on data from 2021 760 days. Median amongst judges was 224,3 days.
In 2021 the judge decided 194 cases in the observed agendas.
In this dimension the judge belongs to the group that is average.

Component – Productivity

Weighted product of the judge in 2021 was 191.27. Median amongst judges was 248,1.
For the judge we register 356 unresolved cases at the end of 2021. From those 77.25% are restant cases. Median amongst judges was 39,34% of restant cases from the total number of unresolved cases.
In this dimension the judge belongs to the group that is worse than average.

Overall Evaluation
Evaluation on a scale from 0 to 10.

Indicators for 2017

Number of Constitutional Court decisions against the judge:

  • Issued – 0
  • Delays prior to case assignment – 0

The judge was mostly assigned to Commercial agenda. The judge mostly issued judgements in Commercial agenda.

The judge worked 1487 days in the period and was assigned on average 96 cases per 100 days in main agendas.

Evaluation

In 2017, the judge received in total 23.5 from 40 possible points and ranked on 224 – 243. place of 651 evaluated judges.

  • Quality – 10.5 out of 15 points
  • Effectivity – 13 out of 25 points

Chart Comparison

Legend
Advanced Comparison
The chart is most useful for comparisons of judges at the same or similar courts, and those who decide cases in the same or similar agenda. Specific courts and agendas have an impact on the overall performance of judges. Simply put, commercial judge from Bratislava and criminal judge from Rožňava decide uncomparable cases.

Quality Indicators

The judge's judgements were on appeal affirmed in 77.9% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 66.5%.

  • Number of Appellate Decisions – 86
  • Number of Affirmed Decisions – 67

An appeal against the judge's judgements is filed in 3.6% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 8.5%.

Of the total number of the judge's judgements 0.8% is changed or reversed. The average in the same agenda is 2.8%.

Effectivity Indicators

Estimated average length of proceedings is 267.4 days. The average at the end of 2017 was 340.8 days.

The judge had 241 unresolved cases at the end of 2017. The average was 192.7 cases.

The judge had 140 restant cases at the end of 2017. The average was 111.7. This represents 58.1% of the judge's unresolved cases. Average was 54.1%.

In 2017, the judge was able to resolve 146.9% of assigned cases. Average was 141.8%.

Indicators for 2015

Number of Constitutional Court decisions against the judge:

  • Issued – 0
  • Delays prior to case assignment – 0

The judge was mostly assigned to Commercial agenda. The judge mostly issued judgements in Commercial agenda.

The judge worked 1057 days in the period and was assigned on average 73 cases per 100 days in main agendas.

Evaluation

In 2015, the judge received in total 25.5 from 40 possible points and ranked on 194 – 213. place of 738 evaluated judges.

  • Quality – 10.5 out of 15 points
  • Effectivity – 15 out of 25 points

Chart Comparison

Legend
Advanced Comparison
The chart is most useful for comparisons of judges at the same or similar courts, and those who decide cases in the same or similar agenda. Specific courts and agendas have an impact on the overall performance of judges. Simply put, commercial judge from Bratislava and criminal judge from Rožňava decide uncomparable cases.

Quality Indicators

The judge's judgements were on appeal affirmed in 74.6% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 64.9%.

  • Number of Appellate Decisions – 63
  • Number of Affirmed Decisions – 47

An appeal against the judge's judgements is filed in 3.8% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 8.8%.

Of the total number of the judge's judgements 1% is changed or reversed. The average in the same agenda is 3%.

Effectivity Indicators

Estimated average length of proceedings is 253 days. The average at the end of 2015 was 339 days.

The judge had 354 unresolved cases at the end of 2015. The average was 377 cases.

The judge had 129 restant cases at the end of 2015. The average was 150. This represents 36.4% of the judge's unresolved cases. Average was 42.6%.

In 2015, the judge was able to resolve 97.3% of assigned cases. Average was 97.1%.

Indicators for 2013

The number of Constitutional court judgements against the judges – issued 0 and delays prior to case assignment 0.

For the judge we register performance data for years 2011 – 2013:

Sudcovi bola prideľovaná najmä Obchodná agenda. Sudca rozhodoval najmä v Obchodnej agende.

The judge in this period worked 641 days and on average was assigned 127 cases in 10 days in main agendas.

Chart Comparison

Legend
Advanced Comparison
The chart is most useful for comparisons of judges at the same or similar courts, and those who decide cases in the same or similar agenda. Specific courts and agendas have an impact on the overall performance of judges. Simply put, commercial judge from Bratislava and criminal judge from Rožňava decide uncomparable cases.

Quality indicators

Rozhodnutie sudcu bolo v prípade odvolania potvrdené v 73,5% prípadoch, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 63,7%.

  • Number of appellate judgements – 34
  • Number of confirmed judgements – 25

Odvolanie proti rozhodnutiam sudcu je podávané v približne 3,9% prípadoch, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 9,7%.

Z celkového počtu rozhodnutí sudcu je zmenených alebo zrušených 1%, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 3,4%.

Efficiency indicators

Odhadovaná priemerná dĺžka konania sporu je 321 dní. Priemer bol na konci roka 346 dní.

Sudca mal na konci roka 2013 nevybavených 301 prípadov. Priemer bol 238.

Sudca mal na konci roka 131 reštančných vecí, pričom priemer je 126. To u sudcu tvorí 42,4% z nevybavených vecí. Priemer je 43,4.

Sudca dokázal v roku 2013 vybaviť, k počtu pridelených vecí, 119,6% prípadov. Priemer bol 99,6%.

Sudca získal podľa našej metodológie celkovo 24,5 bodov. Spomedzi 739 hodnotených sudcov sa umiestnil na 185 – 195. mieste. Za kvalitu získal 11,25 z 15 možných bodov, za efektivitu 13,25 z 25.

Notes

obtained from annual statistical reports of judges pertaining to indicators.

  • 2013 – Pracovné stretnutie sudcov obvodu Krajského súdu v Banskej Bystrici,25.–26.04.2013,IMS Omšenie, Spoločné rokovanie občianskoprávneho a správneho kolégia Krajského súdu v Banskej Bystrici spojené s poradou so sudcami okresných súdov v obvode pôsobnosti krajského súdu vybavujúcimi občianskoprávnu a správnu agendu,17.–18.10.2013,IMS Omšenie
  • 2012 – Obchodno–právne kolégium KS v BB a okresných súdov v obvode, 17.–18.9.2012, Omšenie
  • 2011 – 18.5.2011 – Obchodné záväzkové vzťahy ÚPV B. Bystrica 10.11.2011 – obchodné kolégium KS v Banskej Bystrici; 2012 – Obchodno–právne kolégium KS v BB a okresných súdov v obvode, 17.–18.9.2012, Omšenie; 2013 – Pracovné stretnutie sudcov obvodu Krajského súdu v Banskej Bystrici,25.–26.04.2013,IMS Omšenie, Spoločné rokovanie občianskoprávneho a správneho kolégia Krajského súdu v Banskej Bystrici spojené s poradou so sudcami okresných súdov v obvode pôsobnosti krajského súdu vybavujúcimi občianskoprávnu a správnu agendu,17.–18.10.2013,IMS Omšenie
  • 2011 – 18.5.2011 – Obchodné záväzkové vzťahy ÚPV B. Bystrica 10.11.2011 – obchodné kolégium KS v Banskej Bystrici

Published judgements

  1. Uznesenie – Obchodné záväzkové vzťahy
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  2. Uznesenie – Obchodné spoločnosti
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  3. Uznesenie – Obchodné spoločnosti
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  4. Uznesenie – Obchodné spoločnosti
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  5. Uznesenie – Obchodné spoločnosti
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  6. Uznesenie – Obchodné spoločnosti
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  7. Rozsudok – Zmenky
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  8. Rozsudok – Incidenčné spory
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  9. Uznesenie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  10. Uznesenie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

More judgements

Upcoming hearings

We do not register any upcoming hearings for the judge yet.

Past hearings

  1. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, 3.395,14 Eur s prísl. Hearing was held on

  2. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, 9 252,47 Eur s prísl. Hearing was held on

  3. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, o zaplatenie 4880 EUR s… Hearing was held on

  4. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, o zaplatenie 57.490,53 Eur s… Hearing was held on

  5. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, o zaplatenie 11.000,- Eur s… Hearing was held on

  6. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, o zaplatenie 6.000,- Eur s… Hearing was held on

  7. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, o zaplatenie 10490 Eur s… Hearing was held on

  8. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, o zaplatenie 57.177,65 Eur s… Hearing was held on

  9. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, o zaplatenie 8.674,42 Eur s… Hearing was held on

  10. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, o zaplatenie 62.582,- Eur s… Hearing was held on

More hearings

Information regarding the court were obtained from the judge list, which was most recently updated on . The information may have been additionally supplemented by the data retrieved from property declarations and statistical reports.