JUDr. Jana Tóthová

  1. Active judge at the court Okresný súd Trnava, we register 1,179 hearings and 1,509 judgements.
  1. The judge has been nominated to function for about 11 years.

Indicators for 2021

We do not register any indicators for the judge yet.

Indicators for 2017

We do not register any indicators for the judge yet.

Indicators for 2015

Number of Constitutional Court decisions against the judge:

  • Issued – 0
  • Delays prior to case assignment – 0

The judge was mostly assigned to Commercial agenda. The judge mostly issued judgements in Commercial agenda.

The judge worked 562 days in the period and was assigned on average 60 cases per 100 days in main agendas.

Evaluation

In 2015, the judge received in total 17 from 40 possible points and ranked on 557 – 575. place of 738 evaluated judges.

  • Quality – 4.5 out of 15 points
  • Effectivity – 12.5 out of 25 points

Chart Comparison

Legend
Advanced Comparison
The chart is most useful for comparisons of judges at the same or similar courts, and those who decide cases in the same or similar agenda. Specific courts and agendas have an impact on the overall performance of judges. Simply put, commercial judge from Bratislava and criminal judge from Rožňava decide uncomparable cases.

Quality Indicators

The judge's judgements were on appeal affirmed in 54.1% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 64.9%.

  • Number of Appellate Decisions – 37
  • Number of Affirmed Decisions – 20

An appeal against the judge's judgements is filed in 4.3% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 8.8%.

Of the total number of the judge's judgements 2% is changed or reversed. The average in the same agenda is 3%.

Effectivity Indicators

Estimated average length of proceedings is 305 days. The average at the end of 2015 was 339 days.

The judge had 484 unresolved cases at the end of 2015. The average was 377 cases.

The judge had 151 restant cases at the end of 2015. The average was 150. This represents 31.2% of the judge's unresolved cases. Average was 42.6%.

In 2015, the judge was able to resolve 81.8% of assigned cases. Average was 97.1%.

Indicators for 2013

The number of Constitutional court judgements against the judges – issued 0 and delays prior to case assignment 0.

For the judge we register performance data for years 2013:

Sudcovi bola prideľovaná najmä Obchodná agenda. Sudca rozhodoval najmä v Obchodnej agende.

The judge in this period worked 146 days and on average was assigned 132 cases in 10 days in main agendas.

Chart Comparison

Legend
Advanced Comparison
The chart is most useful for comparisons of judges at the same or similar courts, and those who decide cases in the same or similar agenda. Specific courts and agendas have an impact on the overall performance of judges. Simply put, commercial judge from Bratislava and criminal judge from Rožňava decide uncomparable cases.

Quality indicators

Evidujeme menej ako 10 odvolaní o rozhodnutiach sudcu, preto dáta považujeme za nereprezentatívne.

Efficiency indicators

Odhadovaná priemerná dĺžka konania sporu je 442 dní. Priemer bol na konci roka 346 dní.

Sudca mal na konci roka 2013 nevybavených 120 prípadov. Priemer bol 238.

Sudca mal na konci roka 37 reštančných vecí, pričom priemer je 126. To u sudcu tvorí 27,2% z nevybavených vecí. Priemer je 43,4.

Sudca dokázal v roku 2013 vybaviť, k počtu pridelených vecí, 51,6% prípadov. Priemer bol 99,6%.

Dáta o kvalite a efektivite sudcu nepovažujeme za dostatočné, preto sudcu bodovo nehodnotíme.

Notes

obtained from annual statistical reports of judges pertaining to indicators.

  • 2013 – od 1.6.2013 dvojnásobný nápad agendy Cb z dôvodu dorovnania počtu vecí
  • 2013 – od 1.6.2013 dvojnásobný nápad agendy Cb z dôvodu dorovnania počtu vecí
  • 2013 – 5.–7.6.2013 – 3 dni – Celokrajové školenie sudcov obvodu KS v TT – poslucháč
  • 2013 – 5.–7.6.2013 – 3 dni – Celokrajové školenie sudcov obvodu KS v TT – poslucháč

Published judgements

  1. Uznesenie – Obchodné spoločnosti
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  2. Uznesenie – Spoločnosť s ručením obmedzeným
    Iná povaha rozhodnutia
    Judgement was issued on

  3. Uznesenie – Obchodné spoločnosti
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  4. Uznesenie – Spoločnosť s ručením obmedzeným
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  5. Uznesenie – Spoločnosť s ručením obmedzeným
    Iná povaha rozhodnutia
    Judgement was issued on

  6. Uznesenie – Obchodné spoločnosti
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  7. Uznesenie – Akciová spoločnosť
    Iná povaha rozhodnutia
    Judgement was issued on

  8. Uznesenie – Spoločnosť s ručením obmedzeným
    Iná povaha rozhodnutia
    Judgement was issued on

  9. Uznesenie – Spoločnosť s ručením obmedzeným
    Iná povaha rozhodnutia
    Judgement was issued on

  10. Uznesenie – Spoločnosť s ručením obmedzeným
    Iná povaha rozhodnutia
    Judgement was issued on

More judgements

Upcoming hearings

We do not register any upcoming hearings for the judge yet.

Past hearings

  1. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, žaloba o usporiadanie majetku… Hearing was held on

  2. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, vydanie PR o zaplatenie… Hearing was held on

  3. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, vydanie PR o zaplatenie… Hearing was held on

  4. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, zaplatenie 13.917,38 € s… Hearing was held on

  5. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, vydanie PR o zaplatenie 26… Hearing was held on

  6. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, určenie popretej pohľadávky Hearing was held on

  7. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, určenie popretej pohľadávky Hearing was held on

  8. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, vydanie PR o zaplatenie 155… Hearing was held on

  9. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, určenie výšky, právneho… Hearing was held on

  10. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, nahradenie prejavu vôle a o… Hearing was held on

More hearings

Information regarding the court were obtained from the judge list, which was most recently updated on . The information may have been additionally supplemented by the data retrieved from property declarations and statistical reports.